The impact of on-demand metacognitive help on effortful behaviour: A longitudinal study using task-related visual analytics

[1]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Kshitij Sharma,et al.  Predicting learners' effortful behaviour in adaptive assessment using multimodal data , 2020, LAK.

[3]  Kshitij Sharma,et al.  Building pipelines for educational data using AI and multimodal analytics: A "grey-box" approach , 2019, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[5]  Patrícia Augustin Jaques,et al.  Effects of adaptive training on metacognitive knowledge monitoring ability in computer-based learning , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[6]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Students’ effort allocation to their perceived strengths and weaknesses: The moderating effect of instructional strategy , 2018, Learning and Instruction.

[7]  Rafael Anaya-Sánchez,et al.  Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Chien-Hung Lin,et al.  The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts , 2018 .

[10]  Judy Kay,et al.  Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: a systematic review , 2018, LAK.

[11]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Explaining learning performance using response-time, self-regulation and satisfaction from content: an fsQCA approach , 2018, LAK.

[12]  Nicolás Morales,et al.  Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Robert Maribe Branch,et al.  The influence of achievement goals on online help seeking of computer science students , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  S. Hemphill,et al.  Examination of associations between informal help-seeking behavior, social support, and adolescent psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis , 2017 .

[15]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  Review of Research on Student-Facing Learning Analytics Dashboards and Educational Recommender Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[16]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  How Learners’ Interactions Sustain Engagement: A MOOC Case Study , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[17]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  Awareness Is Not Enough: Pitfalls of Learning Analytics Dashboards in the Educational Practice , 2017, EC-TEL.

[18]  Mark Stansfield,et al.  The Potential of Learning Analytics in Understanding Students’ Engagement with Their Assessment Feedback , 2017, 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[19]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing , 2017 .

[20]  Nicholas V. Mudrick,et al.  Using Data Visualizations to Foster Emotion Regulation During Self-Regulated Learning with Advanced Learning Technologies , 2017 .

[21]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[22]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Enhancing learning outcomes through self-regulated learning support with an Open Learner Model , 2017, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[23]  Ladislav Moták,et al.  Motivation to seek help and help efficiency in students who failed in an initial task , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Victor R. Lee,et al.  Appropriating Quantified Self Technologies to Support Elementary Statistical Teaching and Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[25]  Qiang Hao,et al.  What are the most important predictors of computer science students' online help-seeking behaviors? , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  M. Setia.  Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies , 2016, Indian journal of dermatology.

[27]  Erik Duval,et al.  Interactive surfaces and learning analytics: data, orchestration aspects, pedagogical uses and challenges , 2016, LAK.

[28]  Xian Liu.  Methods for handling missing data , 2016 .

[29]  LeeAnn M. Sutherland,et al.  Beyond performance data: Improving student help seeking by collecting and displaying influential data in an online middle-school science curriculum , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Ido Roll,et al.  Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics , 2015, J. Learn. Anal..

[33]  Zacharoula Papamitsiou,et al.  Visualitzacions d’anàlisi temporal de l’aprenentatge per augmentar el coneixement durant l’avaluació , 2015 .

[34]  Steven Lonn,et al.  Investigating student motivation in the context of a learning analytics intervention during a summer bridge program , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Christian Gütl,et al.  A Competence-based Service for Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Virtual Environments , 2015, J. Learn. Anal..

[36]  Linda Corrin,et al.  How do students interpret feedback delivered via dashboards? , 2015, LAK.

[37]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[38]  Allison D. Cantor,et al.  Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge , 2015, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Barbara A. Greene.  Measuring Cognitive Engagement With Self-Report Scales: Reflections From Over 20 Years of Research , 2015 .

[40]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Temporal Learning Analytics for Adaptive Assessment , 2014 .

[41]  Hongyue WANG,et al.  Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis , 2014, Shanghai archives of psychiatry.

[42]  Lorna M. Campbell,et al.  Analytics for Education , 2014 .

[43]  Johan Jeuring,et al.  University students' achievement goals and help-seeking strategies in an intelligent tutoring system , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  On the Benefits of Seeking (and Avoiding) Help in Online Problem-Solving Environments , 2014, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[45]  Erik Duval,et al.  Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[46]  Olev Must,et al.  TEST-TAKING EFFORT AS A PREDICTOR OF PERFORMANCE IN LOW-STAKES TESTS , 2013 .

[47]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[48]  Hal A. Lawson,et al.  New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice , 2013 .

[49]  Yi Guo,et al.  Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[50]  C. Y. Peng,et al.  The Impact of APA and AERA Guidelines on Effect Size Reporting , 2013 .

[51]  J. C. Setzer,et al.  An Investigation of Examinee Test-Taking Effort on a Large-Scale Assessment , 2013 .

[52]  M. Bannert,et al.  Scaffolding Hypermedia Learning Through Metacognitive Prompts , 2013 .

[53]  Anna K. Fletcher,et al.  How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process , 2012 .

[54]  Genna Angello,et al.  Multiple-Choice Tests Exonerated, at Least of Some Charges , 2012, Psychological science.

[55]  Shana K. Carpenter.  Testing Enhances the Transfer of Learning , 2012 .

[56]  C. Abraham,et al.  Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Oana Velcu,et al.  A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Robert Rueda,et al.  Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[59]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes , 2011 .

[60]  A. Ryan,et al.  Help-seeking tendencies during early adolescence: An examination of motivational correlates and consequences for achievement , 2011 .

[61]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Classroom and technology-supported help seeking: The need for converging research paradigms , 2011 .

[62]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system , 2011, Learning and Instruction.

[63]  Nathalie Huet,et al.  The influence of achievement goals and perceptions of online help on its actual use in an interactive learning environment , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[64]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards , 2010 .

[65]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change , 2010 .

[66]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The complexity of tool use in computer-based learning environments , 2009 .

[68]  Moffat Mathews,et al.  Analysing High-Level Help-Seeking Behaviour in ITSs , 2008, AH.

[69]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Design Considerations for Collaborative Visual Analytics , 2008, Inf. Vis..

[70]  Pedagógia,et al.  Cross Sectional Study , 2019 .

[71]  B. Mulsant,et al.  Statistical analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data with dropouts. , 2007, Journal of psychiatric research.

[72]  J. Hattie,et al.  The Power of Feedback , 2007 .

[73]  Erik Duval,et al.  Tracking Actual Usage: the Attention Metadata Approach , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[74]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  The Help Tutor: Does Metacognitive Feedback Improve Students' Help-Seeking Actions, Skills and Learning? , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[75]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[76]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Meta-cognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[77]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[78]  Bradley A. Hanson,et al.  Development and Calibration of an Item Response Model That Incorporates Response Time , 2005 .

[79]  Steven L. Wise,et al.  Response Time Effort: A New Measure of Examinee Motivation in Computer-Based Tests , 2005 .

[80]  P. Pintrich.  A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students , 2004 .

[81]  Claudia Gama,et al.  Metacognition in Interactive Learning Environments: The Reflection Assistant Model , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[82]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[83]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[84]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[85]  Julie Chen,et al.  Time will tell. , 2003, Current surgery.

[86]  Xiaodong Lin.  Designing metacognitive activities , 2001 .

[87]  Nancy J. Stone,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Calibration and Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[88]  D. Hedeker,et al.  Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts Between Two Groups , 1999 .

[89]  C. Wolters.  Self-Regulated Learning and College Students' Regulation of Motivation. , 1998 .

[90]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Experimenting to Bootstrap Self-Regulated Learning , 1997 .

[91]  B. Zimmerman.  Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview , 1990 .

[92]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[93]  R. Little.  A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values , 1988 .

[94]  S. Gall,et al.  Chapter 2 Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning , 2007 .

[95]  S. Gall,et al.  Chapter 2: Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning , 1985 .

[96]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[97]  J. Hausman.  Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .