The potential for hydrogen-enriched biogas production from crops: Scenarios in the UK

There is increasing international interest in developing low carbon technologies to provide hydrogen renewably. Hydrogen can be produced through dark anaerobic fermentation using carbohydrate-rich substrates, and methane can be produced in a methanogenic second stage. The suitability of a range of crops for hydrogen and methane production in the UK is examined, using selection criteria including yield, harvest window and composition of the crops. The annual potential for hydrogen and methane production is calculated using the selected crops, taking into account the energy required to grow and harvest the biomass and run the process. The fermentable energy crops fodder beet, forage maize, sugar beet and rye grass were identified as the most suitable substrates for this farm-scale process. A conservative estimate of the amount of agricultural land in the UK excluding permanent grassland not already used for food production or energy crops (currently unused "set-aside" land) has been made (294,960 ha). If this was used to grow a rotation of the selected crops, 9.6 TW h net energy could be produced per year. This equates to electrical power for 2.2 million homes in the UK annually and a reduction of CO2 emissions by over 2.3 million tones per annum in the UK.

[1]  S. Anthony,et al.  Identifying the yield potential of Miscanthus x giganteus: an assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of M. x giganteus biomass productivity across England and Wales , 2004 .

[2]  Moktar Hamdi,et al.  Effect of temperature on the performance of an anaerobic tubular reactor treating fruit and vegetable waste , 2004 .

[3]  J. Hugenholtz,et al.  Acetogenic and Acid-Producing Clostridia , 1989 .

[4]  R. Dinsdale,et al.  Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from a wheat starch co‐product by mixed microflora , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  W. Bergthaller,et al.  Starch from Alberta potatoes: wet-isolation and some physicochemical properties , 1999 .

[6]  Richard E. Speece,et al.  Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters , 1996 .

[7]  Kenneth J. Moore,et al.  Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. , 2002 .

[8]  Orhan Yenigün,et al.  Two‐phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review , 2002 .

[9]  Petri Ekholm,et al.  Structural characterization of water-insoluble nonstarchy polysaccharides of oats and barley , 2005 .

[10]  G. P. Keane,et al.  Agronomic factors affecting the yield and quality of forage maize in Ireland: effect of sowing date and plastic film treatment , 2002 .

[11]  P. Schweigert,et al.  Yield and its stability, crop diversity, adaptability and response to climate change, weather and fertilisation over 75 years in the Czech Republic in comparison to some European countries , 2004 .

[12]  P. Cappelletto,et al.  Italy-grown hemp: yield, composition and cannabinoid content , 2001 .

[13]  G. Venturi,et al.  Analysis of energy comparison for crops in European agricultural systems , 2003 .

[14]  K. Jaggard,et al.  An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK , 2005 .

[15]  D. L. Hawkes,et al.  Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from sucrose and sugarbeet , 2005 .

[16]  D. R. Woods,et al.  The Clostridia and biotechnology , 1993 .

[17]  Dale R. Smith,et al.  Diurnal variations of nonstructural carbohydrates in the individual parts of switchgrass shoots at anthesis , 1974 .

[18]  D L Hawkes,et al.  Influence of substrate concentration on the stability and yield of continuous biohydrogen production , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  Thomas Lampke,et al.  Surface characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers; Surface properties and the water uptake behavior , 2002 .

[20]  F. Gordon,et al.  The effect of stage of perennial ryegrass maturity at harvesting, fermentation characteristics and concentrate supplementation, on the quality and intake of grass silage by beef cattle , 2002 .

[21]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[22]  J. Lay,et al.  HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND DEGRADATION OF CELLULOSE BY ANAEROBIC DIGESTED SLUDGE , 1999 .

[23]  J. Nix.  Farm management pocketbook , 1980 .

[24]  R. Sun,et al.  Fractional extraction and physico-chemical characterization of hemicelluloses and cellulose from sugar beet pulp , 1998 .

[25]  G. Venturi,et al.  Comparison of two Sorghum genotypes for sugar and fiber production , 1998 .

[26]  Y. Ueno,et al.  Hydrogen Production from Industrial Wastewater by Anaerobic Microflora in Chemostat Culture , 1996 .

[27]  D. L. Hawkes,et al.  Sustainable fermentative hydrogen production: challenges for process optimisation , 2002 .

[28]  L. Hazard,et al.  Productivity under contrasting cutting regimes of perennial ryegrass selected for short and long leaves , 1997, Euphytica.

[29]  R. Schils,et al.  Dry matter yield and herbage quality of a perennial ryegrass / white clover sward in a rotational grazing and cutting system , 1999 .

[30]  Duru,et al.  The effect of N and P fertilizer application and botanical composition on the leaf/stem ratio patterns in spring in Pyrenean meadows , 1999 .

[31]  C. Hoffmann,et al.  Influence of sulphur supply on yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): determination of a threshold value , 2004 .

[32]  Emmanuel G. Koukios,et al.  Bioethanol from sweet sorghum: Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of carbohydrates by a mixed microbial culture , 1996 .

[33]  John Tzilivakis,et al.  Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems , 2005 .

[34]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[35]  David P. Chynoweth,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of biomass , 1987 .