Making Peace with the Rising Costs of Writing Technologies: Flexible Classroom Design as a Sustainable Solution

Abstract In a challenging economy where budgets for academic programs seem to shrink each year, writing programs face serious economic challenges. When fiscal challenges are paired with the ever-changing nature of writing technologies and the need to update classroom technologies on a regular basis, the challenges can seem insurmountable. In this article the authors discuss the multiple phases of a classroom redesign project where first-year composition students used their own laptop computers in a flexible classroom, which included mobile furnishings, mobile whiteboards, and multiple LCD screens for projection. The purpose of the project was to design a space that was economically sustainable and would better meet the needs of composition instructors and students. To meet that goal, the First-Year Writing Program partnered with the institution's IT and Design Services to develop the flexible classroom model. The flexible classroom project sought to answer the question: how do we take existing classroom spaces and small/shrinking budgets and make the spaces work well for the teaching of writing? Based on financial comparisons of equipment between the flexible classroom versus classrooms where computers are provided by the university, as well as student surveys, the authors found that a flexible design is a cost-effective solution that is also an effective pedagogical space.

[1]  Lennie Scott-Webber,et al.  In sync : environmental behavior research and the design of learning spaces , 2004 .

[2]  Roxanne Kent-Drury,et al.  Finding a place to stand: Negotiating the spatial configuration of the networked computer classroom , 1998 .

[3]  Sawyer A. Hunley,et al.  Assessment: The Key to Creating Spaces that Promote Learning. , 2009 .

[4]  Douglas M. Walls,et al.  Hacking Spaces: Place as Interface , 2009 .

[5]  Ann Hill Duin,et al.  Using the PAIR-up Model to Evaluate Active Learning Spaces. , 2009 .

[6]  Nedra Reynolds.  Geographies of Writing: Inhabiting Places and Encountering Difference , 2003 .

[7]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[8]  K. Bruffee.  Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1995 .

[9]  Summer Smith Taylor.  Effects of Studio Space on Teaching and Learning: Preliminary Findings from Two Case Studies , 2009 .

[10]  William Dittoe.  Innovative models of learning environments , 2002 .

[11]  R. Beichner.  The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[12]  Christian R. Weisser,et al.  Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches , 2001 .

[13]  Thomas Skill,et al.  Embracing the hybrid model: Working at the intersections of virtual and physical learning spaces , 2002 .

[14]  Erika Lindemann.  A rhetoric for writing teachers , 1982 .

[15]  Kenneth A. Bruffee,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1999 .

[16]  Nedra Reynolds.  Composition's Imagined Geographies: The Politics of Space in the Frontier, City, and Cyberspace , 1998 .