Co-evolution of Friendships and Antipathies: A Longitudinal Study of Preschool Peer Groups

We used stochastic actor-based models to test whether the developmental dynamics of friendships and antipathies in preschool peer groups (followed throughout three school years) were co-dependent. We combined choices from three sociometric tasks of 142 children to identify friendship and antipathy ties and used SIENA to model network dynamics. Our results show that different social processes drive the development of friendship and antipathy ties, and that they do not develop in association (i.e., friendship ties are not dependent on existing antipathies, and vice-versa). These results differ from those of older children (age range = 10–14) suggesting that the interplay of friendship and antipathy only plays a significant role in the peer group context in older children. We propose these differences to be likely related with preschool age children's inaccurate perceptions of their classmates' relationships, particularly of their antipathies, and/or with the absence of shared norms to deal with antipathetic relationships.

[1]  M. Paulus.  It's payback time: Preschoolers selectively request resources from someone they had benefitted. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[2]  João R. Daniel,et al.  Affiliative structures and social competence in Portuguese preschool children. , 2015, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models , 2011, Adv. Data Anal. Classif..

[4]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships, and Peer Networks. , 2003 .

[5]  T. Snijders,et al.  Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks , 2014, Development and Psychopathology.

[6]  D. Ruble,et al.  Patterns of gender development. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Noel A. Card,et al.  Antipathetic relationships in child and adolescent development: a meta-analytic review and recommendations for an emerging area of study. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[8]  D. S. Hayes.  Cognitive Bases for Liking and Disliking among Preschool Children. , 1978 .

[9]  B. Mccandless,et al.  A picture sociometric technique for preschool children and its relation to teacher judgments of friendship. , 1957, Child development.

[10]  Katherine Faust,et al.  A puzzle concerning triads in social networks: Graph constraints and the triad census , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[11]  S. Asher,et al.  A Reliable Sociometric Measure for Preschool Children. , 1979 .

[12]  Alessandro Lomi,et al.  A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[13]  G. Maassen,et al.  Nominations, Ratings, and the Dimensions of Sociometric Status , 1997 .

[14]  E. Oord,et al.  Some Developmental Implications of Structural Aspects of Preschoolers' Relations with Classmates , 2000 .

[15]  Jennifer Watling Neal,et al.  Seeing and being seen: Predictors of accurate perceptions about classmates' relationships , 2016, Soc. Networks.

[16]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Foundations of cooperation in young children , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  Elizabeth K. Starkweather.  A Comparison of Two Techniques for Measuring Sociometric Status Among Nursery School Children , 1962 .

[18]  Marco F. H. Schmidt,et al.  The Early Ontogeny of Social Norms , 2013 .

[19]  J. Ashwin Rambaran,et al.  The development of adolescents' friendships and antipathies: A longitudinal multivariate network test of balance theory , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[20]  Per Block,et al.  Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks* , 2014, Network Science.

[21]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups , 2007 .

[22]  T. Hasegawa,et al.  Social network analyses of positive and negative relationships among Japanese preschool classmates , 2009 .

[23]  Carla Fernandes,et al.  Affiliative Subgroups in Preschool Classrooms: Integrating Constructs and Methods from Social Ethology and Sociometric Traditions , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  E. Lichtenstein.  Social learning. , 1977, NIDA research monograph.

[25]  Miranda J. Lubbers,et al.  Group composition and network structure in school classes: a multilevel application of the p∗ model , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[26]  F. Poulin,et al.  Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence , 2010 .

[27]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Timescales, Symmetry, and Uncertainty Reduction in the Origins of Hierarchy in Biological Systems , 2012 .

[28]  João R. Daniel,et al.  Exponential random graph models of preschool affiliative networks , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  The microstructures of network recall: How social networks are encoded and represented in human memory , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[30]  Social Ecology of the Preschool Peer Group , 1980 .

[31]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Relative importance of effects in stochastic actor-oriented models* , 2013, Network Science.

[32]  J. Strayer,et al.  The perception of preschool social dominance , 1978 .

[33]  D. S. Hayes,et al.  Friends and enemies: Cognitive bases for preschool children's unilateral and reciprocal relationships. , 1980 .

[34]  João R. Daniel,et al.  Social engagement and adaptive functioning during early childhood: Identifying and distinguishing among subgroups differing with regard to social engagement. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[35]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children's peer affiliative networks: a longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. , 2012, Child development.

[36]  J. Coie,et al.  A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children , 1991 .

[37]  F. Heider.  ATTITUDES AND COGNITIVE ORGANIZATION , 1977 .

[38]  Adrienne Nishina,et al.  Mutual antipathies during early adolescence: More than just rejection , 2005 .

[39]  T. Snijders,et al.  A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution , 2003 .

[40]  Nicholas Harrigan,et al.  Why does everybody hate me? Balance, status, and homophily: The triumvirate of signed tie formation , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[41]  B. H. Wasik.  Sociometric Measures and Peer Descriptors of Kindergarten Children: A Study of Reliability and Validity , 1987 .

[42]  John Skvoretz,et al.  8. Comparing Networks across Space and Time, Size and Species , 2002 .

[43]  B. Vaughn,et al.  Friendship and social competence in a sample of preschool children attending Head Start. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[44]  C. Moore,et al.  Producing and understanding prosocial actions in early childhood. , 2012, Advances in child development and behavior.

[45]  J. Snyder,et al.  A social learning model of peer choice in the natural environment , 1996 .

[46]  Peng Wang,et al.  Univariate and multivariate models of positive and negative networks: Liking, disliking, and bully-victim relationships , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[47]  Amy Bellmore,et al.  Children's meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy of acceptance and rejection by same-sex and other-sex peers , 2003 .

[48]  B. Vaughn,et al.  Dyadic Analyses of Preschool‐aged Children's Friendships: Convergence and Differences between Friendship Classifications from Peer Sociometric Data and Teacher's Reports , 2014 .

[49]  John M. Light,et al.  Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[50]  W. Catton.  The Acquaintance Process.Theodore M. Newcomb , 1962 .

[51]  N. Roese,et al.  Preferences for expressing preferences: People prefer finer evaluative distinctions for liked than disliked objects , 2014 .

[52]  Konstantinos Petrogiannis,et al.  Criteria for selection and rejection of social relationships among children in urban and rural kindergartens in Greece , 2012 .

[53]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[54]  Christian Berger,et al.  Competition, Envy, or Snobbism? How Popularity and Friendships Shape Antipathy Networks of Adolescents , 2013 .

[55]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[56]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .