Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements

In two experiments coupling between dorsal attentional selection for action and ventral attentional selection for perception during preparation of prehension movements was examined. In a dual-task paradigm subjects had to grasp an X-shaped object with either the left or the right hand's thumb and index finger. Simultaneously a discrimination task was used to measure visual attention prior to the execution of the prehension movements: Mask items transiently changed into distractors or discrimination targets. There was exactly one discrimination target per trial, which appeared at one of the four branch ends of the object. In Experiment 1 target position varied randomly while in Experiment 2 it was constant and known to subjects in each block of trials. In both experiments discrimination performance was significantly better for discrimination target positions at to-be-grasped branch ends than for not-to-be-grasped branch ends. We conclude that during preparation of prehension movements visual attention is largely confined to those parts of an object that will be grasped.

[1]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[2]  A. Wing,et al.  The Contribution of the Thumb to Reaching Movements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  S. Jackson,et al.  Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[8]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[9]  J. Duncan.  Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. , 1996 .

[10]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[12]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[15]  O. Neumann.  Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention , 1987 .

[16]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  W. Schneider.  VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action , 1995 .

[20]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Interference from Distractors in Reach-to-grasp Movements , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[24]  U. Castiello.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[29]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[30]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Dissociation of covert and overt spatial attention during prehension movements: Selective interference effects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[32]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[34]  F. Previc.  Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.