Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study

The aims of the study were to investigate learner profiles in a MOOC focused on attitudinal learning, Science of Happiness, based on learner self-assessment of happiness and relationships with demographics, attitudinal learning gains and preferred instructional activities. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used in the attitudinal learning survey. The survey assessed cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning, and was followed by interviews with 12 participants. Latent profile analysis identified two profiles based on the differences in the levels and trends of happiness reported by learners during the 10-week course. Results indicated that MOOC learners described different preferences for exploratory or instructor-directed instructional strategies. Identified implications for the instructional design of MOOCs for attitudinal learning included recognizing that MOOC learners often view MOOCs more as entertainment as opposed to formal education. Therefore, course length, pace, scope, and difficulty should be considered in this light. Furthermore, supporting varied learner goals and interests, and instructional preferences are important. Finally, special consideration must also be paid to the design and facilitation of course discussions. Latent profile analysis identified 2 profiles based on happiness levels and trends.Learners identified different instructional preferences: instructor-led versus self-directed.Course design should consider views of MOOCs as entertainment.Design should support varied learner goals and preferences.MOOC discussion challenges merit focus on design and facilitation.

[1]  Min Chul Kang,et al.  A latent profile analysis of the interplay between PC and smartphone in problematic internet use , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Instructional design, facilitation, and perceived learning outcomes: an exploratory case study of a human trafficking MOOC for attitudinal change , 2016 .

[3]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal Classical Latent Profile Analysis of Academic Self-concept Dimensions: Synergy of Person-and Variable-centered Approaches to Theoretical Models of Self-concept , 2022 .

[4]  M. Knežević,et al.  Attitude change towards guests with disabilities: Reflections From Tourism Students , 2011 .

[5]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes , 1979 .

[6]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[7]  Barbara J. Wilson,et al.  Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective? , 2007, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[8]  William R. Watson,et al.  Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an Animal Behavior and Welfare MOOC , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[9]  William R. Watson,et al.  A Team of Instructors' Use of Social Presence, Teaching Presence, and Attitudinal Dissonance Strategies: An Animal Behaviour and Welfare MOOC. , 2017 .

[10]  James T. Flynn,et al.  Moocs: Disruptive Innovation and the Future of Higher Education , 2013 .

[11]  William R. Watson,et al.  Perceived learning in three MOOCs targeting attitudinal change , 2016 .

[12]  Marc Clarà,et al.  Learning online: massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology , 2013 .

[13]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[14]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[15]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Early Prediction of Student Dropout and Performance in MOOCs using Higher Granularity Temporal Information , 2014, J. Learn. Anal..

[16]  Kathy Enger,et al.  A Multi-Cultural Transformative Approach to Learning: Assessing Attitude Change in Doctoral Students following an Online Diversity Course. , 2011 .

[17]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Situated learning, instructional technology, and attitude change , 1995 .

[18]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs , 2014, L@S.

[19]  Allison S. Gabriel,et al.  Emotional labor actors: a latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  William R. Watson,et al.  Instructor’s Use of Social Presence, Teaching Presence, and Attitudinal Dissonance: A Case Study of an Attitudinal Change MOOC , 2016 .

[21]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Democratizing Higher Education: Exploring MOOC Use Among Those Who Cannot Afford a Formal Education , 2014 .

[22]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 1957 .

[23]  E. Xing,et al.  Towards an Integration of Text and Graph Clustering Methods as a Lens for Studying Social Interaction in MOOCs , 2014 .

[24]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[25]  Philip G. Zimbardo,et al.  Influencing attitudes and changing behavior : a basic introduction to relevant methodology, theory, and applications , 1972 .

[26]  Simon Darcy,et al.  PERSONAL AND SOCIETAL ATTITUDES TO DISABILITY , 2005 .

[27]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Context counts: How learners' contexts influence learning in a MOOC , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[28]  R. Edwards,et al.  What Is Qualitative Interviewing , 2013 .

[29]  Il-Hyun Jo,et al.  Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data: A case study in a Korean higher education institute , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[30]  Susan Alman,et al.  Many Shades of MOOCs , 2014 .

[31]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Moving Through MOOCS: Pedagogy, Learning Design and Patterns of Engagement , 2015, EC-TEL.

[32]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence , 1991 .

[33]  John W. Creswell,et al.  A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research , 2014 .

[34]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[35]  Dena A. Pastor,et al.  A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation , 2007 .

[36]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  MOOCocracy: the learning culture of massive open online courses , 2016 .

[37]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[38]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[39]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Tita Beaven,et al.  Motivation in a language MOOC: issues for course designers , 2014 .

[41]  Judith Ramsay,et al.  Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[42]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals , 2017 .