INFORMATION STRUCTURE AND THE ACCESSIBILITY OF CLAUSALLY INTRODUCED REFERENTS

Propositions, situations, and certain other entities, introduced into a discourse with a non-nominal expression, are typically available to immediate, subsequent reference with a demonstrative pronoun, but not with a personal pronoun. The paper examines the effects of information structure and the lexical semantics of verbs taking clausal complements on these possibilities of subsequent reference. A one-way relationship is found between possibilities for subsequent reference and an information structural bifurcation into focus and ground (or comment and topic, rheme and theme). When an expression introducing one of the entities in question occurs in the informational focus, the contrast in subsequent reference by a demonstrative versus a personal pronoun mentioned above is obtained; when such an expression occurs in the informational ground, the contrast is neutralized. Furthermore, the contrast is obtained for an entity introduced by a (informationally focal) bridge verb complement, but not by a non-bridge verb complement. These effects are explained in terms of the referential possibilities conferred by different referring forms according to Gundel, Hedberg and Zacharski (1993), and the role of information and lexical structure in bringing an entity into focus of attention.

[1]  Karin Pittner,et al.  Zur positionierung der adverbiale im deutschen mittelfeld: 2342 , 1998 .

[2]  Jeanette K. Gundel.  On three kinds of focus , 1999 .

[3]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[4]  Kari Fraurud,et al.  Cognitive ontology and NP form , 1996 .

[5]  Jeanette K. Gundel.  Topic, Focus, and the Grammar-Pragmatics Interface , 1999 .

[6]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[7]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[8]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[9]  Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng,et al.  More papers on wh-movement , 1991 .

[10]  Ray Cattell,et al.  On the Source of Interrogative Adverbs. , 1978 .

[11]  A. Lascarides,et al.  Questions in Dialogue , 1998 .

[12]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Modeling and Using Context , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On semantics , 1980 .

[14]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From discourse to logic , 1993 .

[15]  Jeanette K. Gundel.  Universals of topic-comment structure , 1988 .

[16]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Providing a Unified Account of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse , 1983, ACL.

[17]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis , 1991, ArXiv.

[18]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  The Role of Context in Pronominal Reference to Higher Order Entities in English and Norwegian , 1999, CONTEXT.

[19]  Keith S. Donnellan.  Reference and Definite Descriptions , 1966 .

[20]  Kaja Borthen,et al.  What brings a higher-order entity into focus of attention? Sentential pronouns in English and Norwegian. , 1997 .

[21]  Daniel Büring,et al.  Let's Phrase It! Focus, Word Order, and Prosodic Phrasing in German Double Object Constructions * , 2000 .

[22]  Klaus von Heusinger,et al.  Salienz und Referenz : der Epsilonoperator in der Semantik der Nominalphrase und anaphorischer Pronomen , 1997 .

[23]  Ray Jackendoff.  Reference and Truth , 2002 .

[24]  Juergen Lenerz.  Scrambling and reference in German , 2002 .

[25]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Competition in syntax , 2001 .

[26]  Michael Hegarty.  Reference to Abstract Entities within Clausal Complements , 2000 .

[27]  J rgen Lenerz,et al.  Word Order Variation: Competition or Co-Operation? , 2001 .

[28]  H. Putnam.  Realism and Reason: Reference and truth , 1983 .

[29]  Bonnie Webber,et al.  Discourse Deixis and Discourse Processing , 1988 .

[30]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Elements of Grammar: Handbook In Generative Syntax , 1998 .

[31]  Ann E. Mulkern,et al.  Quantity implicatures in reference understanding , 1998 .

[32]  James Higginbotham,et al.  Elucidations of meaning* , 1989 .

[33]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[34]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Reference to abstract objects in discourse , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[35]  R. Sandt,et al.  Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , 1999 .

[36]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .