A New Handheld Device for the Detection of Falsified Medicines: Demonstration on Falsified Artemisinin-Based Therapies from the Field

Poor-quality medicines are a major problem for health-care systems in resource-poor settings as identifying falsified medicines requires a complex laboratory infrastructure such as a Medicines Quality Control Laboratory. We report here an evaluation of a low-cost, handheld near-infrared spectrometer (NIRS) device by analyzing a library of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) medicines to determine its usefulness as a drug-screening tool. The “SCiO” research prototype device was used to collect NIR spectra of a library of ACT and artesunate monotherapy medicine samples previously collected in Bioko Island and Equatorial Guinea and Kintampo, Ghana. The quality of these samples had been categorized as falsified, substandard, and quality assured based on the amount of stated active pharmaceutical ingredients detected using high-performance liquid chromatography photodiode array. Numerical analyses were performed on the NIR spectra to assess the usefulness of NIR to identify falsified and substandard medicines. The NIRS device was successful at detecting falsified medicines in all cases where the library contained both quality assured and falsified medicines of the same stated brand of medicines. The NIRS device was successful at identifying substandard amounts of artesunate but not amodiaquine in the ACT samples (N = 15) of artesunate–amodiaquine. This work reveals that this low-cost, portable NIRS device is promising for screening ACTs for falsified samples and could enable widespread drug screening at all points of the health system.

[1]  Paul N Newton,et al.  Poor-quality antimalarial drugs in southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. , 2012, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[2]  Benjamin K. Wilson,et al.  Fake anti-malarials: start with the facts , 2016, Malaria Journal.

[3]  Roger Bate,et al.  Pilot Study Comparing Technologies to Test for Substandard Drugs in Field Settings , 2009 .

[4]  Nicola Ranieri,et al.  Evaluation of a New Handheld Instrument for the Detection of Counterfeit Artesunate by Visual Fluorescence Comparison , 2014, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[5]  C. S. Gautam,et al.  Spurious and counterfeit drugs: a growing industry in the developing world , 2009, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[6]  P. Newton,et al.  How to achieve international action on falsified and substandard medicines , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Patrick Lukulay,et al.  Assessment of the performance of a handheld Raman device for potential use as a screening tool in evaluating medicines quality. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[8]  M. Malet‐Martino,et al.  Counterfeit drugs: analytical techniques for their identification , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[9]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[10]  P. Olliaro,et al.  The initial pharmaceutical development of an artesunate/amodiaquine oral formulation for the treatment of malaria: a public-private partnership , 2011, Malaria Journal.

[11]  Stephaney Gyaase,et al.  Quality of Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy for malaria found in Ghanaian markets and public health implications of their use , 2016, BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology.

[12]  P. Olliaro,et al.  Fixed artesunate-amodiaquine combined pre-formulation study for the treatment of malaria. , 2010, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[13]  Sergei G. Kazarian,et al.  Assessment of hand-held Raman instrumentation for in situ screening for potentially counterfeit artesunate antimalarial tablets by FT-Raman spectroscopy and direct ionization mass spectrometry. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.

[14]  D. V. van Schalkwyk,et al.  Degradation of Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapies under Tropical Conditions , 2016, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.