Net Neutrality Discourses: Comparing Advocacy and Regulatory Arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom

Telecommunications policy issues rarely make news, much less mobilize thousands of people. Yet this has been occurring in the United States around efforts to introduce “Net neutrality” regulation. A similar grassroots mobilization has not developed in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in Europe. We develop a comparative analysis of U.S. and UK Net neutrality debates with an eye toward identifying the arguments for and against regulation, how those arguments differ between the countries, and what the implications of those differences are for the Internet. Drawing on mass media, advocacy, and regulatory discourses, we find that local regulatory precedents as well as cultural factors contribute to both agenda setting and framing of Net neutrality. The differences between national discourses provide a way to understand both the structural differences between regulatory cultures and the substantive differences between policy interpretations, both of which must be reconciled for the Internet to continue to thrive as a global medium.

[1]  Arrow Buttons.  Frequently asked questions , 2009 .

[2]  C. S. Yoo.  Beyond Network Neutrality , 2005 .

[3]  Christian Sandvig.  Network neutrality is the new common carriage , 2007 .

[4]  D. Mckie,et al.  Talking Politics , 1975, The Lancet.

[5]  Martin B. H. Weiss,et al.  Communications Policy and the Public Interest , 2001 .

[6]  Kenneth C. Creech.  Communications Policy and the Public Interest: The Telecommunications Act of 1996 , 2000 .

[7]  Sascha D. Meinrath,et al.  The New Network Neutrality: Criteria for Internet Freedom , 2006 .

[8]  Pierre Larouche,et al.  Network Neutrality in the EU , 2007 .

[9]  Barbara van Schewick.  Internet Architecture and Innovation , 2010 .

[10]  R. McChesney.  The Battle for the U.S. Airwaves, 1928–1935 , 1990 .

[11]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Brett M. Frischmann,et al.  Network Neutrality and the Economics of an Information Superhighway: A Reply to Professor Yoo , 2007 .

[13]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  M. Cave,et al.  Does Europe Need Network Neutrality Rules , 2007 .

[15]  J. Sidak.  A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Network Neutrality Regulation of the Internet , 2006 .

[16]  Frederick Turner,et al.  Where the Counterculture Met the New Economy: The WELL and the Origins of Virtual Community , 2005 .

[17]  Tim Wu.  Net Neutrality , 2010, Net Neutrality.

[18]  James F. Wilson.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[19]  Susan P. Crawford,et al.  The Internet and the Project of Communications Law , 2007 .

[20]  Dino Falaschetti.  Can Latent Groups Influence Policy Decisions? The Case of Telecommunications Policy , 2002 .

[21]  R. Smith.  Net Neutrality: Towards a Co-Regulatory Solution , 2010 .

[22]  M. McCombs.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[23]  Robin Mansell.  The problem of internationalizing media and communication research , 2007 .

[24]  Christopher S. Yoo,et al.  Would Mandating Broadband Network Neutrality Help or Hurt Competition? A Comment on the End-to-End Debate , 2004, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[25]  Richard M. Alderman,et al.  Testimony Before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary , 2008 .

[26]  M. McCombs.  A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[27]  Randall B. Ripley.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. By James Q. Wilson. New York: Basic Books, 1989. 433p. $24.95. , 1990 .

[28]  Barbara van Schewick.  Towards an Economic Framework for Network Neutrality Regulation , 2005, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[29]  Richard A. V. Diener,et al.  Technologies of freedom , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Tim Wu,et al.  Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination , 2003, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[31]  Milton L. Mueller,et al.  Democratizing Global Communication? Global Civil Society and the Campaign for Communication Rights in the Information Society , 2007 .

[32]  Barbara S. Esbin.  Net Neutrality: A Further Take on the Debate , 2009 .

[33]  R. McChesney.  Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media , 2007 .

[34]  Harmeet Sawhney,et al.  Wi-Fi networks and the rerun of the cycle , 2003 .

[35]  Peter Cramton,et al.  Economists' Statement on Network Neutrality Policy , 2007 .

[36]  Milton L. Mueller,et al.  Civil Society and the Shaping of Communication–Information Policy: Four Decades of Advocacy , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[37]  Damian Tambini,et al.  Electronic democracy and the civic networking movement in context , 1997 .

[38]  Cathy Packer,et al.  Speech Rights in America: The First Amendment, Democracy, and the Media , 2007 .

[39]  D. Shaw,et al.  The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas , 1993 .