Modelling and Control of Magnetorheological Damper: Real-time implementation and experimental verification

This thesis considers two main issues concerning the application of a rotary type magnetorheological (MR) damper for damping of flexible structures. The first is the modelling and identification of the damper property, while the second is the formulation of effective control strategies. The MR damper is identified by both the standard parametric Bouc-Wen model and the non-parametric neural network model from an experimental data set generated by dynamic tests of the MR damper mounted in a hydraulic testing machine. The forward model represents the direct dynamics of the MR damper where velocity and current are used as input and the force as output. The inverse model represents the inverse dynamics of the MR damper where the absolute velocity and absolute force are used as input and the damper current as output. For the inverse model the current output of the network must always be positive, and it is found that the modelling error of the inverse model is significantly reduced when the corresponding input is given in terms of the absolute values of velocity and damper force. This is a new contribution to the inverse modelling techniques for the control of MR dampers. Another new contribution to the modelling of an MR damper is the use of experimental measurement data of a rotary MR damper that requires appropriate filtering. The semi-systematic optimisation procedure proposed in the thesis derives an effective neural network structure, where only velocity and damper force are essential input parameters for the MR damper modelling. Thus, for proper training, the quality of the velocity data is very important. However, direct velocity measurement is not easy. From the displacement data or the acceleration data, velocity can be determined by using simple differentiation or integration, respectively, but these processes add undesirable noise to the velocity. Instead the Kinematic Kalman Filter (KKF) is an effective means for estimation of velocity. The KKF does not directly depend on the system or structural model, as it is the case for the conventional Kalman filter. The KKF fuses the displacement and the acceleration data to get an accurate and robust estimate of the velocity. The simplicity of the network and the application of velocity in terms of KKF is a novel contribution of the thesis to the generation of a training set for neural network modelling of MR dampers. The development of the control strategies for the MR damper focuses on the introduction of apparent negative stiffness, which basically leads to an increased local motion of the damper and thereby to increased energy dissipation and damping. Optimal viscous damping (VD) is chosen as the benchmark control strategy, used as reference case for assessment of the proposed control methods with negative stiffness. Viscous damping with negative stiffness (VDNS) initially illustrates the effectiveness of the negative stiffness component in structural damping. In a linear control setting negative stiffness requires active control forces, which are not realizable by the purely dissipative MR damper. Thus, these active components are simply clipped in the final control implementation. Since MR dampers behave almost as a friction damper improved damping performance can be obtained by a suitable combination of pure friction and negative damper stiffness. This is realized by amplitude dependent friction damping with negative stiffness (FDNS), where the force level of the friction component is adaptively changed to secure the optimal balance between friction energy dissipation and apparent negative stiffness. This type of control model for semi-active dampers is rate-independent and conveniently described in terms of the desired shape of the associated hysteresis loop or force-displacement trajectory. The final method considered for control of the rotary MR damper is a model reference neural network controller (MRNNC). This novel control approach is designed and trained based on a desired reference damper model, which in this case is the amplitude dependent friction damping with negative stiffness (FDNS). The idea is to train the neural network of the controller by data derived explicitly from the desired shape of the force-displacement loop at pure harmonic motion. In this idealized representation the optimal relations between friction force level, negative stiffness and response amplitude can often be given explicitly by e.g. maximizing the damping ratio of the targeted vibration mode. Consequently the idea behind this trained neural network is that the optimal properties of the desired hysteresis loop formulation can be extrapolated to more general and non-harmonic response patterns, e.g. narrow-band stochastic response due to wind, wave, traffic or even earthquake excitation. Numerical and experimental simulations have been conducted to examine the performance of the proposed control strategies. Force tracking by using an inverse neural network of the MR damper is improved by a low-pass filter to reduce the noise in the desired current and a simple switch that truncates negative values of the desired current. The performance of the collocated control schemes for the rotary type semi-active MR damper are initially verified by closed loop dynamic experiments conducted on a 5-storey shear frame structure exposed to harmonic base excitation. The MR damper is mounted on the structure so that it operates on the relative motion between the ground base and the first floor of the shear frame. The shear frame structural model is initially experimentally identified, where mass and stiffness of the model is determined by an inverse modal analysis based on the natural frequencies obtained experimentally. The damping matrix is subsequently determined from the estimated damping ratio obtained by free decay tests. The results in the thesis demonstrate that introducing apparent negative stiffness to the control of the MR damper significantly decreases both the top floor displacement and acceleration amplitudes of the shear frame structure. The structural damping ratios obtained from the response curves of the experiments correspond well to the expected values. This indicates that the mean stiffness and mean energy dissipation of the control forces are predicted fairly accurate. A final numerical investigation is based on a classic benchmark problem for earthquake protection of a multi storey building. The seismic response of the base-isolated benchmark building with an MR damper installed between the ground and the base is illustrated, and the effectiveness of negative stiffness of the control strategies is verified numerically. Similarly, the response of another wind excited benchmark building installed with MR dampers is demonstrated and the performance shows satisfactory result. The main contributions to this thesis are the novel modelling approach to the direct and the inverse dynamics of a rotary MR damper from experimental data, the development of model based semi-active control strategies for the MR damper, the effective introduction of negative stiffness in the control of semi-active dampers and the demonstration of effectiveness and closed loop implementation of the control techniques on both a shear frame structure and a numerical benchmark problem.

[1]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Sliding Mode Control for Nonlinear and Hysteretic Structures , 1995 .

[2]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[3]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[4]  José A. Inaudi,et al.  Modulated homogeneous friction : A semi-active damping strategy , 1997 .

[5]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection , 1998 .

[6]  André Preumont,et al.  Vibration Control of Active Structures: An Introduction , 2018 .

[7]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Active control of a tall structure excited by wind , 1999 .

[8]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[9]  Chao Wang,et al.  Modified sliding-mode bang–bang control for seismically excited linear structures , 2000 .

[10]  Paul N. Roschke,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy control of structures using acceleration feedback , 2001 .

[11]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Benchmark Problem for Response Control of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings , 2004 .

[12]  Faramarz Gordaninejad,et al.  Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers for Control of Bridges , 2002 .

[13]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  "SMART" BASE ISOLATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[14]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Passive and semi‐active seismic response control of a cable‐stayed bridge , 2002 .

[15]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Study of a semi-active stiffness damper under various earthquake inputs , 2002 .

[16]  Mahmood Yahyai,et al.  Control of response of structures with passive and active tuned mass dampers , 2002 .

[17]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  NEURAL NETWORK EMULATION OF INVERSE DYNAMICS FOR A MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPER , 2002 .

[18]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  “Smart” Base Isolation Strategies Employing Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[19]  Jinxiong Zhou,et al.  Experimental study of the semi‐active control of building structures using the shaking table , 2003 .

[20]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural networks , 2003 .

[21]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  CONTROL OF SEISMICALLY EXCITED CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE EMPLOYING MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FLUID DAMPERS , 2003 .

[22]  Anil K. Agrawal,et al.  Novel Semiactive Friction Controller for Linear Structures against Earthquakes , 2003 .

[23]  Lawrence A. Bergman,et al.  SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SUBJECTED TO SEISMIC EXCITATION , 2003 .

[24]  Anastasios I. Dounis,et al.  Optimum fuzzy sliding mode semi-active control of structures subjected to earthquakes , 2003, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[25]  Pinqi Xia,et al.  An inverse model of MR damper using optimal neural network and system identification , 2003 .

[26]  B. Sp,et al.  State of the Art of Structural Control , 2003 .

[27]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Seismic Control of a Nonlinear Benchmark Building using Smart Dampers , 2004 .

[28]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Vibration Control of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings using Sliding Mode Fuzzy Control , 2004 .

[29]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  Modified Sliding Mode Control for Wind-Excited Benchmark Problem , 2004 .

[30]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Large-Scale Magnetorheological Damper Systems for Civil Engineering Applications , 2004 .

[31]  W. Q. Zhu,et al.  Semi-active control of wind excited building structures using MR/ER dampers , 2004 .

[32]  In-Won Lee,et al.  Optimal Neurocontroller for Nonlinear Benchmark Structure , 2004 .

[33]  R. Sedaghati,et al.  Modelling the hysteresis phenomenon of magnetorheological dampers , 2004 .

[34]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Model Predictive Control of Wind-Excited Building: Benchmark Study , 2004 .

[35]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Generalized linear quadratic Gaussian techniques for the wind benchmark problem , 2004 .

[36]  Roger Stanway,et al.  A unified modelling and model updating procedure for electrorheological and magnetorheological vibration dampers , 2004 .

[37]  Chih-Chen Chang,et al.  Shear-Mode Rotary Magnetorheological Damper for Small-Scale Structural Control Experiments , 2004 .

[38]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Simple algorithm for semi‐active seismic response control of cable‐stayed bridges , 2005 .

[39]  Luis Alvarez-Icaza,et al.  LuGre friction model for a magnetorheological damper , 2005 .

[40]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Optimal design of viscous dampers for multi-mode vibration control of bridge cables , 2005 .

[41]  Wei-Hsin Liao,et al.  Modeling and control of magnetorheological fluid dampers using neural networks , 2005 .

[42]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Implementation of Modal Control for Seismically Excited Structures using Magnetorheological Dampers , 2005 .

[43]  M. Saiid Saiidi,et al.  Neural Network Active Control of Structures with Earthquake Excitation , 2005 .

[44]  Joseph A. Main,et al.  Efficiency and tuning of viscous dampers on discrete systems , 2005 .

[45]  Glauco Feltrin,et al.  Passive damping of cables with MR dampers , 2005 .

[46]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Experimental Verification of Smart Cable Damping , 2006 .

[47]  W. Sun,et al.  Design, Testing and Modeling of a Magnetorheological Damper with Stepped Restoring Torque , 2006 .

[48]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Negative stiffness friction damping for seismically isolated structures , 2006 .

[49]  A. E. Binshtok,et al.  Energy Dissipation in Electrorheological Damping Devices , 2006 .

[50]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Application of some semi‐active control algorithms to a smart base‐isolated building employing MR dampers , 2006 .

[51]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Smart base‐isolated benchmark building part IV: Phase II sample controllers for nonlinear isolation systems , 2006 .

[52]  Lily L. Zhou,et al.  Integrated fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms for multi-objective control of structures using MR dampers , 2006 .

[53]  Ion Stiharu,et al.  A new dynamic hysteresis model for magnetorheological dampers , 2006 .

[54]  Steen Krenk,et al.  Linear control strategies for damping of flexible structures , 2006 .

[55]  Khaldoon A. Bani-Hani,et al.  Semi‐active neuro‐control for base‐isolation system using magnetorheological (MR) dampers , 2006 .

[56]  J. Høgsberg Modelling of Dampers and Damping in Structures , 2006 .

[57]  Bijan Samali,et al.  A novel hysteretic model for magnetorheological fluid dampers and parameter identification using particle swarm optimization , 2006 .

[58]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Smart base‐isolated benchmark building. Part I: problem definition , 2006 .

[59]  Rahmi Guclu,et al.  Sliding mode and PID control of a structural system against earthquake , 2006, Math. Comput. Model..

[60]  Mauricio Zapateiro,et al.  Neural Network Modeling of a Magnetorheological Damper , 2007, CCIA.

[61]  Hui Li,et al.  Vibration Control of Stay Cables of the Shandong Binzhou Yellow River Highway Bridge Using Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers , 2007 .

[62]  Bogdan Sapiński,et al.  Experimental study of vibration control of a cable with an attached MR damper , 2007 .

[63]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Semi-active control of a building complex with variable friction dampers , 2007 .

[64]  Meiying Ye,et al.  Parameter estimation of the Bouc–Wen hysteresis model using particle swarm optimization , 2007 .

[65]  C. S. Cai,et al.  Cable Vibration Control with a TMD-MR Damper System: Experimental Exploration , 2007 .

[66]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Seismic control of smart base isolated buildings with new semiactive variable damper , 2007 .

[67]  Hyun-Su Kim,et al.  GA-fuzzy control of smart base isolated benchmark building using supervisory control technique , 2007, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[68]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Modeling and identification of a shear mode magnetorheological damper , 2007 .

[69]  A. K-Karamodin,et al.  Semi‐active control of structures using neuro‐predictive algorithm for MR dampers , 2008 .

[70]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy control strategy for earthquake-excited nonlinear magnetorheological structures , 2008 .

[71]  Gregory N. Washington,et al.  Vibration Control of Structural Systems using MR dampers and a `Modified' Sliding Mode Control Technique , 2008 .

[72]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Seismic protection of base‐isolated building with nonlinear isolation system using smart passive control strategy , 2008 .

[73]  Leonardo Tavares Stutz,et al.  Stochastic and hybrid methods for the identification in the Bouc-Wen model for magneto – rheological dampers , 2008 .

[74]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Neuro‐genetic algorithm for non‐linear active control of structures , 2008 .

[75]  Kung-Chun Lu,et al.  Decentralized sliding mode control of a building using MR dampers , 2008 .

[76]  Francesc Pozo,et al.  Acceleration Feedback Control of Hysteretic Base-Isolated Structures: Application to a Benchmark Case , 2008 .

[77]  Ananth Ramaswamy,et al.  GA-optimized FLC-driven semi-active control for phase-II smart nonlinear base-isolated benchmark building , 2008 .

[78]  Felix Weber,et al.  Detailed analysis and modelling of MR dampers at zero current , 2008 .

[79]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  An Experimental Study of Semiactive Modal Neuro-control Scheme Using MR Damper for Building Structure , 2008 .

[80]  S. Olutunde Oyadiji,et al.  Application of MR damper in structural control using ANFIS method , 2008 .

[81]  Min Liu,et al.  Negative stiffness characteristics of active and semi‐active control systems for stay cables , 2008 .

[82]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  MR fluid damper-based smart damping systems for long steel stay cable under wind load , 2008 .

[83]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Magnetorheological dampers in shear mode , 2008 .

[84]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Semiactive Backstepping Control for Vibration Reduction in a Structure with Magnetorheological Damper Subject to Seismic Motions , 2009 .

[85]  M Sunwoo,et al.  Fuzzy modelling approach to magnetorheological dampers: Forward and inverse model , 2009 .

[86]  Zhang Ling,et al.  Parameter Estimation and its Sensitivity Analysis of the MR Damper Hysteresis Model Using a Modified Genetic Algorithm , 2009 .

[87]  Felix Weber,et al.  Optimal semi-active damping of cables : evolutionary algorithms and closed-form solutions , 2009 .

[88]  Shaikh Faruque Ali,et al.  Hybrid structural control using magnetorheological dampers for base isolated structures , 2009 .

[89]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Seismic protection of frame structures via semi-active control: modeling and implementation issues , 2009 .

[90]  Soo Jeon,et al.  Kinematic Kalman Filter (KKF) for Robot End-Effector Sensing , 2009 .

[91]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Real‐time hybrid testing of semiactive control strategies for vibration reduction in a structure with MR damper , 2009 .

[92]  Ananth Ramaswamy,et al.  Optimal fuzzy logic control for MDOF structural systems using evolutionary algorithms , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[93]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Advances in the development of pseudo‐negative‐stiffness dampers for seismic response control , 2009 .

[94]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Passively controlled MR damper in the benchmark structural control problem for seismically excited highway bridge , 2009 .

[95]  Glauco Feltrin,et al.  Cycle energy control of magnetorheological dampers on cables , 2009 .

[96]  R. Sedaghati,et al.  Development of LuGre Friction Model for Large-Scale Magneto—Rheological Fluid Dampers , 2009 .

[97]  Haiping Du,et al.  Model-based Fuzzy Control for Buildings Installed with Magneto-rheological Dampers: , 2009 .

[98]  Şevki Çeşmeci,et al.  Comparison of some existing parametric models for magnetorheological fluid dampers , 2010 .

[99]  Hui Li,et al.  Analysis of capability for semi‐active or passive damping systems to achieve the performance of active control systems , 2010 .

[100]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Mechanics performance test of MR damper and its application in structural seismic response control , 2010 .

[101]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic Response of Base-Isolated Benchmark Building with Variable Sliding Isolators , 2010 .

[102]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Viscous + Dahl model for MR damper characterization: a real-time hybrid test (RTHT) validation , 2010 .

[103]  Steen Krenk,et al.  Optimal Tuning of Amplitude Proportional Coulomb Friction Damper for Maximum Cable Damping , 2010 .

[104]  C. S. Cai,et al.  Cable vibration control with a semiactive MR damper-numerical simulation and experimental verification , 2010 .

[105]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Modeling of a disc-type magnetorheological damper , 2010 .

[106]  H. Metered,et al.  The experimental identification of magnetorheological dampers and evaluation of their controllers , 2010 .

[107]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Experimental Investigation of MR Damper-based Semiactive Control Algorithms for Full-scale Five-story Steel Frame Building , 2010 .

[108]  F Weber,et al.  Energy based optimization of viscous–friction dampers on cables , 2010 .

[109]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Real-Time Hybrid Test Validation of a MR Damper Controlled Building with Shake Table Tests , 2011 .

[110]  Felix Weber,et al.  An adaptive tuned mass damper based on the emulation of positive and negative stiffness with an MR damper , 2010 .

[111]  Jan Becker Høgsberg,et al.  The role of negative stiffness in semi‐active control of magneto‐rheological dampers , 2011 .

[112]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Optimal semi-active damping of cables with bending stiffness , 2011 .

[113]  Felix Weber,et al.  Clipped viscous damping with negative stiffness for semi-active cable damping , 2011 .

[114]  Wei-Hsin Liao,et al.  Magnetorheological fluid dampers: a review of parametric modelling , 2011 .

[115]  José Rodellar,et al.  Parametric identification of the Dahl model for large scale MR dampers , 2012 .

[116]  Subrata Bhowmik,et al.  Experimental calibration of forward and inverse neural networks for rotary type magnetorheological damper , 2013 .