Studying laughter in combination with two humanoid robots

To let humanoid robots behave socially adequate in a future society, we started to explore laughter as an important para-verbal signal known to influence relationships among humans rather easily. We investigated how the naturalness of various types of laughter in combination with different humanoid robots was judged, first, within a situational context that is suitable for laughter and, second, without describing the situational context. Given the variety of human laughter, do people prefer a certain style for a robot’s laughter? And if yes, how does a robot’s outer appearance affect this preference, if at all? Is this preference independent of the observer’s cultural background? Those participants, who took part in two separate online surveys and were told that the robots would laugh in response to a joke, preferred one type of laughter regardless of the robot type. This result is contrasted by a detailed analysis of two more surveys, which took place during presentations at a Japanese and a German high school, respectively. From the results of these two surveys, interesting intercultural differences in the perceived naturalness of our laughing humanoids can be derived and challenging questions arise that are to be addressed in future research.

[1]  K. Grammer.  Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters , 1990 .

[2]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  THE RITUALISATION OF LAUGHTER Karl Grammer Irenaus Eibl-Eibesfeldt CONTENTS 1. THE RITUALISATION OF BEHAVIOUR 2. METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES 3. DETERMINANTS OF RITUALISATION OF LAUGHTER 4. THE FUNCTION OF LAUGHTER BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. THE RITUALISATION OF BEHAVIOUR , 1998 .

[4]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  J. Panksepp.  The Riddle of Laughter , 2000 .

[6]  Joseph E LeDoux.  Emotion Circuits in the Brain , 2000 .

[7]  D. Todt,et al.  VARIATION OF SOUND PARAMETERS AFFECTS THE EVALUATION OF HUMAN LAUGHTER , 2001 .

[8]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Not All Laughs are Alike: Voiced but Not Unvoiced Laughter Readily Elicits Positive Affect , 2001, Psychological science.

[9]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Multi-robot cooperation for human-robot communication , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[10]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  eMuu : an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home , 2002 .

[11]  Phillip J. Glenn.  Laughter in Interaction , 2003 .

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective computing: challenges , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Paolo Dario,et al.  On the development of the emotion expression humanoid robot WE-4RII with RCH-1 , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..

[15]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Function meets style: insights from emotion theory applied to HRI , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[16]  R. Provine.  Laughing, Tickling, and the Evolution of Speech and Self , 2004 .

[17]  K. Scherer.  What are emotions? And how can they be measured? , 2005 .

[18]  Matthew M. Gervais,et al.  THE EVOLUTION AND FUNCTIONS OF LAUGHTER AND HUMOR: A SYNTHETIC APPROACH , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  Yuichiro Yoshikawa,et al.  Responsive Robot Gaze to Interaction Partner , 2006, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[20]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  A Study in Users' Physiological Response to an Empathic Interface Agent , 2006, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[21]  Mel Slater,et al.  Building Expression into Virtual Characters , 2006, Eurographics.

[22]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  S. Burger,et al.  On the Correlation between Perceptual and Contextual Aspects of Laughter in Meetings , 2007 .

[24]  N. Campbell.  Whom we laugh with affects how we laugh , 2007 .

[25]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Robot Manzai: Robot Conversation as a Passive-Social Medium , 2008, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[26]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  How quickly should communication robots respond? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Analysis of inter- and intra-speaker variability of head motions during spoken dialogue , 2008, AVSP.

[28]  Ipke Wachsmuth,et al.  Affective computing with primary and secondary emotions in a virtual human , 2009, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[29]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Laughter in Social Robotics – no laughing matter , 2009 .