Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.

OBJECTIVES The basic prerequisite for the production of dental restorations by means of CAD/CAM technologies is the data acquisition (digitization). Currently, two methods are available, i.e. the extraoral digitization of master casts and the direct intraoral data acquisition. However, it seems to be beneficial to immediately digitize impressions directly at the dental office in order to combine the high precision of mechanical digitizing methods and to shorten the production process. The aim of this study was to investigate the measurement uncertainty (+/-2sigma) and the three-dimensional accuracy of the immediate tactile in-office digitization of dental impressions and of the mechanical digitizing of ceramic master dies using a high-precision touch-probe digitizer. METHODS The experimental set-up consisted of ceramic master dies representing tooth 13 and 36 as well as their identical virtual models (CAD models). Fifteen one-step putty-wash impressions were taken from each tooth. The impressions as well as the ceramic master dies were digitized applying a standardized procedure. The datasets were aligned to the corresponding CAD models; then, a computer-aided three-dimensional analysis was performed. RESULTS The digitizing of the dental impressions showed a measurement uncertainty of 5.8, mean positive deviations between 27 and 28microm, and mean negative deviations between -21 and -31microm. The digitizing of the ceramic master dies showed a measurement uncertainty of 2.8, mean positive deviations between 7.7 and 9.1microm, and mean negative deviations between -8.5 and -8.8microm. CONCLUSION Mechanical digitizers show a very low measurement uncertainty and a high precision. The immediate tactile in-office digitization of impressions cannot be recommended as adequate data acquisition method for CAD/CAM restorations. It is recommendable to digitize clinical sites extraorally, i.e. after taking an impression and fabricating a model cast thereof.

[1]  F Lutz,et al.  [Optimization of the powder application in the Cerec method with environment-friendly propellant systems]. , 1990, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[2]  R DeLong,et al.  Evaluation of factors affecting the accuracy of impressions using quantitative surface analysis. , 1995, Operative dentistry.

[3]  R B Price,et al.  The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations. , 1991, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[4]  Michael H. Walter,et al.  A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  E R Hewlett,et al.  Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  B R Lang,et al.  Determination of the accuracy of three die systems. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  Heike Rudolph,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[8]  A Odén,et al.  Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  Rainer Koch,et al.  Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  J. R. Green,et al.  A study of the quality of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial laboratory , 1993, British Dental Journal.

[12]  J. Pfeiffer.  Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). , 1999, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[13]  Agneta Oden,et al.  A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  R G Luthardt,et al.  Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD/CAM system for fixed restorations. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  S Quaas,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. , 2005, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[16]  H. Rudolph,et al.  Matching point clouds: limits and possibilities. , 2002, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[17]  B Bergman,et al.  The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM of crowns. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  R Hickel,et al.  A New Optical 3-D Device for the Detection of Wear , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[19]  R Luthardt,et al.  Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. , 2002, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[20]  Boris Steipe,et al.  Metric properties of the root-mean-square deviation of vector sets , 1997 .