Real time characterization of polymer surface modifications by an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet: Electrically coupled versus remote mode

We characterize and distinguish two regimes of atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) polymer interactions depending on whether the electrical interaction of the plasma plume with the surface is significant (coupled) or not (remote). When the plasma is coupled to the surface, localized energy deposition by charged species in filaments dominates the interactions with the surface and produces contained damaged areas with high etch rates that decrease rapidly with plasma source-to-sample distance. For remote APP surface treatments, when only reactive neutral species interact with the surface, we established specific surface-chemical changes and very slow etching of polymer films. Remote treatments appear uniform with etch rates that are highly sensitive to feed gas chemistry and APP source temperature.

[1]  Martin Polak,et al.  Low temperature atmospheric pressure plasma sources for microbial decontamination , 2011 .

[2]  Sean P. Gorman,et al.  Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms by Atmospheric Pressure Non-Thermal Plasma , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  J. Wagner,et al.  Negative ions in argon–oxygen discharges , 2005 .

[4]  D. Graves,et al.  Finite element analysis of ring-shaped emission profile in plasma bullet , 2009, 2010 Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science.

[5]  Hyun-Woo Lee,et al.  Global Model of He/O2 and Ar/O2 Atmospheric Pressure Glow Discharges , 2008 .

[6]  R. Brandenburg,et al.  The transition between different modes of barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure , 2009 .

[7]  D. Graves,et al.  Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of lipopolysaccharide in a controlled environment , 2013 .

[8]  Xian-Jun Shao,et al.  Comparative study on the atmospheric pressure plasma jets of helium and argon , 2012 .

[9]  Xiang-ning He,et al.  Polypropylene surface modification model in atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge , 2006 .

[10]  R. Morent,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene with an atmospheric pressure plasma jet sustained in argon and an argon/water vapour mixture , 2011 .

[11]  T. C. Manley The Electric Characteristics of the Ozonator Discharge , 1943 .

[12]  Mounir Laroussi,et al.  Arc-Free Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Jets: A Review , 2007 .

[13]  A. Sarani,et al.  The influence of water vapor content on electrical and spectral properties of an atmospheric pressure plasma jet , 2011 .

[14]  Kostya Ostrikov,et al.  Inactivation of a 25.5 µm Enterococcus faecalis biofilm by a room-temperature, battery-operated, handheld air plasma jet , 2012 .

[15]  L. Rosenthal,et al.  Electrical Characterization of a Corona Discharge for Surface Treatment , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[16]  D. Graves,et al.  Ozone correlates with antibacterial effects from indirect air dielectric barrier discharge treatment of water , 2013 .

[17]  Daphne Pappas,et al.  Status and potential of atmospheric plasma processing of materials , 2011 .

[18]  K. Fricke,et al.  Investigation of Surface Etching of Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) by Atmospheric-Pressure Plasmas , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[19]  G. Oehrlein,et al.  Nonintrusive wafer temperature measurement using in situ ellipsometry , 1991 .

[20]  M. Teschke,et al.  High-speed photographs of a dielectric barrier atmospheric pressure plasma jet , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.