Mind the hubris in mathematical modeling

Here we briefly reflect on the philosophical foundations that ground the quest towards ever-detailed models and identify four practical dangers derived from this pursuit: explosion of the model’s uncertainty space, model black-boxing, computational exhaustion and model attachment. We argue that the growth of a mathematical model should be carefully and continuously pondered lest models become extraneous constructs chasing the Cartesian dream.

[1]  S. Levin,et al.  Models with higher effective dimensions tend to produce more uncertain estimates , 2022, Science advances.

[2]  M. Hajer,et al.  Navigating the political: An analysis of political calibration of integrated assessment modelling in light of the 1.5 °C goal , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[3]  L. Melsen It Takes a Village to Run a Model—The Social Practices of Hydrological Modeling , 2022, Water Resources Research.

[4]  J. Perkel,et al.  How to fix your scientific coding errors , 2022, Nature.

[5]  D. McCollum,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Transparency and integrated assessment modeling , 2021, WIREs Climate Change.

[6]  A. Stamatakis,et al.  The SoftWipe tool and benchmark for assessing coding standards adherence of scientific software , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Erik Grimmer-Solem The visionary realism of German economics: from the thirty years’ war to the cold war , 2021 .

[8]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[9]  V. Balaji,et al.  Climbing down Charney’s ladder: machine learning and the post-Dennard era of computational climate science , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[10]  Malin Källén Towards Higher Code Quality in Scientific Computing , 2021 .

[11]  Simon Robertson,et al.  Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2020, WIREs Climate Change.

[12]  Philip B. Stark,et al.  Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto , 2020, Nature.

[13]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Call for transparency of COVID-19 models , 2020, Science.

[14]  T. Hoefler,et al.  Kilometer-Scale Climate Models: Prospects and Challenges , 2020 .

[15]  S. Eubank,et al.  Commentary on Ferguson, et al., “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand” , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[16]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.

[17]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[18]  R. Joyce Fictionalism , 2020, Fictionalism in Philosophy.

[19]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Past Climate Model Projections , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[20]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A short comment on statistical versus mathematical modelling , 2019, Nature Communications.

[21]  Shikha Verma,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2019, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers.

[22]  Simone Raudino,et al.  The Tyranny of Metrics , 2019, The European Legacy.

[23]  Nans Addor,et al.  Legacy, Rather Than Adequacy, Drives the Selection of Hydrological Models , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[24]  Paul Ernest The Ethics of Mathematics: Is Mathematics Harmful? , 2018 .

[25]  Torsten Hoefler,et al.  Near-global climate simulation at 1 km resolution: establishing a performance baseline on 4888 GPUs with COSMO 5.0 , 2017 .

[26]  L. Johnson SHARING RISKS OR PROLIFERATING UNCERTAINTIES? Insurance, disaster and development , 2017 .

[27]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[28]  Axel Jantsch,et al.  A Perspective on Dark Silicon , 2017 .

[29]  G. Peters,et al.  The trouble with negative emissions , 2016, Science.

[30]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[31]  Peter Bauer,et al.  The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction , 2015, Nature.

[32]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions , 2015 .

[33]  Richard A. Rosen IAMs and peer review , 2015 .

[34]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science, Philosophy and Sustainability : The End of the Cartesian dream , 2015 .

[35]  David A W Soergel,et al.  Rampant software errors may undermine scientific results , 2014, F1000Research.

[36]  Tim Palmer,et al.  Climate forecasting: Build high-resolution global climate models , 2014, Nature.

[37]  Mariano Méndez,et al.  Climate Models: Challenges for Fortran Development Tools , 2014, 2014 Second International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering.

[38]  Rafaela Hillerbrand,et al.  Climate Simulations: Uncertain Projections for an Uncertain World , 2014 .

[39]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the hydrology of the land surface , 2014, Science China Earth Sciences.

[40]  Karthikeyan Sankaralingam,et al.  Dark Silicon and the End of Multicore Scaling , 2012, IEEE Micro.

[41]  Jennifer M. Urban,et al.  Shining Light into Black Boxes , 2012, Science.

[42]  K. Beven,et al.  Comment on “Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water” by Eric F. Wood et al. , 2012 .

[43]  Karthikeyan Sankaralingam,et al.  Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling , 2011, 2011 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA).

[44]  M. Ek,et al.  Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water , 2011 .

[45]  P. Schrimpf,et al.  Dynamic Programming , 2011 .

[46]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[47]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Robust adaptation to climate change , 2010 .

[48]  Mohammad Zulkernine,et al.  Can complexity, coupling, and cohesion metrics be used as early indicators of vulnerabilities? , 2010, SAC '10.

[49]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[50]  Steve McConnell,et al.  Code Complete, Second Edition , 2004 .

[51]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .

[52]  W. Drechsler On the possibility of quantitative‐mathematical social science, chiefly economics: Some preliminary considerations , 2000 .

[53]  E. Reinert Full circle: economics from scholasticism through innovation and back into mathematical scholasticism: Reflections on a 1769 Price essay: “Why is it that economics so far has gained so few advantages from physics and mathematics?” , 2000 .

[54]  R.H. Dennard,et al.  Design Of Ion-implanted MOSFET's with Very Small Physical Dimensions , 1974, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[55]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[56]  M. Balaguer Towards a Nominalization of Quantum Mechanics , 1996 .

[57]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Mathematics and Indispensability , 1993 .

[58]  Penelope Maddy,et al.  Indispensability and Practice , 1992 .

[59]  E. P. James Realism, Mathematics and Modality , 1991 .

[60]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics—III. Further studies of the problem of endemicity , 1991 .

[61]  S. Toulmin Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .

[62]  R. Hersh,et al.  Descartes' Dream: The World According to Mathematics , 1986 .

[63]  N. Cocchiarella Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism , 1984 .

[64]  Anas N. Al-Rabadi,et al.  A comparison of modified reconstructability analysis and Ashenhurst‐Curtis decomposition of Boolean functions , 2004 .

[65]  H. Putnam What is mathematical truth , 1975 .

[66]  A D Puth,et al.  More heat than light. , 1974, Journal of rehabilitation.

[67]  N. Rescher Discourse on a Method , 1968 .

[68]  Abraham H. Maslow,et al.  The psychology of science: a reconnaissance , 1966 .

[69]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[70]  Lewis Carroll,et al.  Sylvie And Bruno Concluded , 1893 .