Mind the hubris in mathematical modeling
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Levin,et al. Models with higher effective dimensions tend to produce more uncertain estimates , 2022, Science advances.
[2] M. Hajer,et al. Navigating the political: An analysis of political calibration of integrated assessment modelling in light of the 1.5 °C goal , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.
[3] L. Melsen. It Takes a Village to Run a Model—The Social Practices of Hydrological Modeling , 2022, Water Resources Research.
[4] J. Perkel,et al. How to fix your scientific coding errors , 2022, Nature.
[5] D. McCollum,et al. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Transparency and integrated assessment modeling , 2021, WIREs Climate Change.
[6] A. Stamatakis,et al. The SoftWipe tool and benchmark for assessing coding standards adherence of scientific software , 2021, Scientific Reports.
[7] Erik Grimmer-Solem. The visionary realism of German economics: from the thirty years’ war to the cold war , 2021 .
[8] M. Sarofim,et al. Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability , 2021, Nature Climate Change.
[9] V. Balaji,et al. Climbing down Charney’s ladder: machine learning and the post-Dennard era of computational climate science , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.
[10] Malin Källén. Towards Higher Code Quality in Scientific Computing , 2021 .
[11] Simon Robertson,et al. Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2020, WIREs Climate Change.
[12] Philip B. Stark,et al. Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto , 2020, Nature.
[13] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Call for transparency of COVID-19 models , 2020, Science.
[14] T. Hoefler,et al. Kilometer-Scale Climate Models: Prospects and Challenges , 2020 .
[15] S. Eubank,et al. Commentary on Ferguson, et al., “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand” , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.
[16] S. Funtowicz,et al. The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.
[17] C. Whittaker,et al. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .
[18] R. Joyce. Fictionalism , 2020, Fictionalism in Philosophy.
[19] G. Schmidt,et al. Evaluating the Performance of Past Climate Model Projections , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.
[20] A. Saltelli,et al. A short comment on statistical versus mathematical modelling , 2019, Nature Communications.
[21] Shikha Verma,et al. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2019, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers.
[22] Simone Raudino,et al. The Tyranny of Metrics , 2019, The European Legacy.
[23] Nans Addor,et al. Legacy, Rather Than Adequacy, Drives the Selection of Hydrological Models , 2019, Water Resources Research.
[24] Paul Ernest. The Ethics of Mathematics: Is Mathematics Harmful? , 2018 .
[25] Torsten Hoefler,et al. Near-global climate simulation at 1 km resolution: establishing a performance baseline on 4888 GPUs with COSMO 5.0 , 2017 .
[26] L. Johnson. SHARING RISKS OR PROLIFERATING UNCERTAINTIES? Insurance, disaster and development , 2017 .
[27] Xiaobo Zhou,et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.
[28] Axel Jantsch,et al. A Perspective on Dark Silicon , 2017 .
[29] G. Peters,et al. The trouble with negative emissions , 2016, Science.
[30] Erik Schultes,et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.
[31] Peter Bauer,et al. The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction , 2015, Nature.
[32] Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al. Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions , 2015 .
[33] Richard A. Rosen. IAMs and peer review , 2015 .
[34] S. Funtowicz,et al. Science, Philosophy and Sustainability : The End of the Cartesian dream , 2015 .
[35] David A W Soergel,et al. Rampant software errors may undermine scientific results , 2014, F1000Research.
[36] Tim Palmer,et al. Climate forecasting: Build high-resolution global climate models , 2014, Nature.
[37] Mariano Méndez,et al. Climate Models: Challenges for Fortran Development Tools , 2014, 2014 Second International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering.
[38] Rafaela Hillerbrand,et al. Climate Simulations: Uncertain Projections for an Uncertain World , 2014 .
[39] Keith Beven,et al. Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the hydrology of the land surface , 2014, Science China Earth Sciences.
[40] Karthikeyan Sankaralingam,et al. Dark Silicon and the End of Multicore Scaling , 2012, IEEE Micro.
[41] Jennifer M. Urban,et al. Shining Light into Black Boxes , 2012, Science.
[42] K. Beven,et al. Comment on “Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water” by Eric F. Wood et al. , 2012 .
[43] Karthikeyan Sankaralingam,et al. Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling , 2011, 2011 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA).
[44] M. Ek,et al. Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water , 2011 .
[45] P. Schrimpf,et al. Dynamic Programming , 2011 .
[46] Paola Annoni,et al. Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .
[47] Suraje Dessai,et al. Robust adaptation to climate change , 2010 .
[48] Mohammad Zulkernine,et al. Can complexity, coupling, and cohesion metrics be used as early indicators of vulnerabilities? , 2010, SAC '10.
[49] Saltelli Andrea,et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .
[50] Steve McConnell,et al. Code Complete, Second Edition , 2004 .
[51] Sheila Jasanoff,et al. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .
[52] W. Drechsler. On the possibility of quantitative‐mathematical social science, chiefly economics: Some preliminary considerations , 2000 .
[53] E. Reinert. Full circle: economics from scholasticism through innovation and back into mathematical scholasticism: Reflections on a 1769 Price essay: “Why is it that economics so far has gained so few advantages from physics and mathematics?” , 2000 .
[54] R.H. Dennard,et al. Design Of Ion-implanted MOSFET's with Very Small Physical Dimensions , 1974, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[55] G.E. Moore,et al. Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[56] M. Balaguer. Towards a Nominalization of Quantum Mechanics , 1996 .
[57] Elliott Sober,et al. Mathematics and Indispensability , 1993 .
[58] Penelope Maddy,et al. Indispensability and Practice , 1992 .
[59] E. P. James. Realism, Mathematics and Modality , 1991 .
[60] W. O. Kermack,et al. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics—III. Further studies of the problem of endemicity , 1991 .
[61] S. Toulmin. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .
[62] R. Hersh,et al. Descartes' Dream: The World According to Mathematics , 1986 .
[63] N. Cocchiarella. Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism , 1984 .
[64] Anas N. Al-Rabadi,et al. A comparison of modified reconstructability analysis and Ashenhurst‐Curtis decomposition of Boolean functions , 2004 .
[65] H. Putnam. What is mathematical truth , 1975 .
[66] A D Puth,et al. More heat than light. , 1974, Journal of rehabilitation.
[67] N. Rescher. Discourse on a Method , 1968 .
[68] Abraham H. Maslow,et al. The psychology of science: a reconnaissance , 1966 .
[69] A. Luchins. Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .
[70] Lewis Carroll,et al. Sylvie And Bruno Concluded , 1893 .