Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Chymotrypsinogen: 2.5-angstrom crystal structure, comparison with alpha-chymotrypsin, and implications for zymogen activation. , 1970, Biochemistry.
[2] N. Xuong,et al. Chymotrypsinogen: 2,5-Å crystal structure, comparison with α-chymotrypsin, and implications for zymogen activation , 1970 .
[3] Eaton E. Lattman,et al. Optimal sampling of the rotation function , 1972 .
[4] G J Williams,et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.
[5] R. Huber,et al. Crystal structure of bovine trypsinogen at 1-8 A resolution. II. Crystallographic refinement, refined crystal structure and comparison with bovine trypsin. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.
[6] W. Kabsch. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1978 .
[7] Y. Satow,et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial protein proteinase inhibitor (Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor) at 2.6 A resolution. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.
[8] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[9] J. Warwicker,et al. Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] W. Bode,et al. Refined 2.5 A X-ray crystal structure of the complex formed by porcine kallikrein A and the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Crystallization, Patterson search, structure determination, refinement, structure and comparison with its components and with the bovine trypsin-pancreatic trypsin inhibit , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.
[11] W. Bode,et al. Refined 2 A X-ray crystal structure of porcine pancreatic kallikrein A, a specific trypsin-like serine proteinase. Crystallization, structure determination, crystallographic refinement, structure and its comparison with bovine trypsin. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.
[12] R. Huber,et al. The Geometry of the Reactive Site and of the Peptide Groups in Trypsin, Trypsinogen and its Complexes with Inhibitors , 1983 .
[13] Michael J. E. Sternberg,et al. Regular representation of irregular charge distributions , 1984 .
[14] M J Sternberg,et al. Electrostatic interactions in globular proteins. Different dielectric models applied to the packing of alpha-helices. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.
[15] R. Huber,et al. The crystal and molecular structure of the third domain of silver pheasant ovomucoid (OMSVP3). , 1985, European journal of biochemistry.
[16] R. H. Ritchie,et al. Dielectric effects in biopolymers: The theory of ionic saturation revisited , 1985 .
[17] A. Tulinsky,et al. The refinement and the structure of the dimer of alpha-chymotrypsin at 1.67-A resolution. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[18] B C Finzel,et al. Three-dimensional structure of an antibody-antigen complex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[19] M. James,et al. Crystal and molecular structure of the serine proteinase inhibitor CI-2 from barley seeds. , 1988, Biochemistry.
[20] B. Honig,et al. Calculation of electrostatic potentials in an enzyme active site , 1987, Nature.
[21] A Wlodawer,et al. Comparison of two highly refined structures of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.
[22] Randy J. Read,et al. Crystal and molecular structures of the complex of α-chymotrypsin with its inhibitor Turkey ovomucoid third domain at 1.8 Å resolution , 1987 .
[23] B. Honig,et al. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: Solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis , 1988, Proteins.
[24] I. Kuntz,et al. Using shape complementarity as an initial screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[25] M. James,et al. Structural comparison of two serine proteinase-protein inhibitor complexes: eglin-c-subtilisin Carlsberg and CI-2-subtilisin Novo. , 1988, Biochemistry.
[26] G. Cohen,et al. Structure of an antibody-antigen complex: crystal structure of the HyHEL-10 Fab-lysozyme complex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[27] K. Sharp,et al. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.
[28] R N Bracewell,et al. Numerical Transforms , 1990, Science.
[29] William H. Press,et al. Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .
[30] Y. Satow,et al. Refined crystal structure of the complex of subtilisin BPN' and Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor at 1.8 A resolution. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[31] I. Kuntz,et al. Protein docking and complementarity. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[32] Larry Wall,et al. Programming Perl , 1991 .
[33] S. Kim,et al. "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[34] T. Bhat,et al. Crystallographic refinement of the three-dimensional structure of the FabD1.3-lysozyme complex at 2.5-A resolution. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[35] B. Honig,et al. A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over‐relaxation to solve the Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 1991 .
[36] D. Schomburg,et al. Three-dimensional structure of the complexes between bovine chymotrypsinogen A and two recombinant variants of human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (Kazal-type). , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[37] J. Janin,et al. Protein‐protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation , 1991, Proteins.
[38] M J Sternberg,et al. New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. Applications to antibody-antigen docking. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.
[39] E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[40] D Schomburg,et al. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant variant of human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (Kazal type). , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.
[41] J Navaza,et al. Three-dimensional structures of the free and the antigen-complexed Fab from monoclonal anti-lysozyme antibody D44.1. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[42] A Tramontano,et al. PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[43] C. Aflalo,et al. Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques , 1994, Proteins.
[44] H. Wolfson,et al. Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces , 1994, Biopolymers.
[45] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme–antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.
[46] Kim A. Sharp,et al. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules , 1994 .
[47] J. Janin,et al. Protein-protein recognition. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[48] O. Ptitsyn. Structures of folding intermediates. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.
[49] K. Watanabe,et al. Dissection of protein-carbohydrate interactions in mutant hen egg-white lysozyme complexes and their hydrolytic activity. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[50] R. Laskowski. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.
[51] M J Sternberg,et al. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[52] H. Wolfson,et al. Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[53] M. Swindells,et al. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[54] S Vajda,et al. Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functions , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[55] Andrew J. Martin,et al. Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[56] D. Schomburg,et al. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[57] J. Cherfils,et al. Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a β-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 β-lactamase , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.
[58] I D Kuntz,et al. Predicting the structure of protein complexes: a step in the right direction. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.
[59] Roland L. Dunbrack,et al. Meeting review: the Second meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996. , 1997, Folding & design.