Simulation of harvester productivity in selective and boom-corridor thinning of young forests

Abstract Forest management practices may change in the future, due to increases in the extraction of forest fuel in first thinnings. Simulation models can be used to aid in developing new harvesting systems. We used such an approach to assess the productivity of innovative systems in various thinnings of young stands with wide ranges of mean breast height diameter (1.5–15.6 cm), stems per hectare (1000–19,100), and mean height (2.3–14.6 m). The results show that selective multiple-tree-handling increases productivity by 20–46% compared to single-tree-handling. If the trees are cut in boom-corridors (10×1 or 2 m strips between strip roads), productivity increases up to 41%, compared to selective multiple-tree-handling. Moreover, if the trees are felled using area-based felling systems, productivity increases by 33–199%, compared to selective multiple-tree-handling. For any given harvesting intensity, productivity increased the most in the densest stands with small trees. The results were used to derive time consumption functions. Comparisons with time study results suggest that our simulation model successfully mimicked productivity in real-life forest operations, hence the model and derived functions should be useful for cost calculations and evaluating forest management scenarios in diverse stands.

[1]  Tomas Gullberg,et al.  Multiple Tree Handling in the Selective Felling and Bunching of Small Trees in Dense Stands , 2002 .

[2]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Simulation of thinning with a single-grip harvester , 1999 .

[3]  M. Kukkola,et al.  Impact of whole-tree harvesting and compensatory fertilization on growth of coniferous thinning stands , 2000 .

[4]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system , 2006 .

[5]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Cutting Corners with a New Crane Concept , 2008 .

[6]  Bruce Talbot,et al.  Assessing the Utility of Two Integrated Harvester-Forwarder Machine Concepts Through Stand-Level Simulation , 2003 .

[7]  Antti Asikainen,et al.  Simulation of stump crushing and truck transport of chips , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas Hellström,et al.  Autonomous Forest Vehicles: Historic, envisioned, and state-of-the-art , 2009 .

[9]  T. Palander,et al.  Analyzing the views of wood harvesting professionals related to the approaches for increasing the cost-efficiency of wood harvesting from young stands. , 2010 .

[10]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  An Interactive Simulation System for Modeling Stands, Harvests, and Machines , 1999 .

[11]  J. Holmgren Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[12]  Ola Lindroos,et al.  The effects of increased mechanization on time consumption in small-scale firewood processing , 2008 .

[13]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[14]  T. Lämås The Haglöf PosTex ultrasound instrument for the positioning of objects on forest sample plots , 2010 .

[15]  Hans Märd Short‐term growth effects of whole‐tree harvest in early thinnings of birch (Betula spp) and Picea abies , 1998 .

[16]  J. F. McNeel,et al.  Modelling Harvester-Forwarder System Performance in a Selection Harvest , 1994 .

[17]  J. Hynynen,et al.  Energy wood thinning as a part of the stand management of Scots pine and Norway spruce , 2009 .

[18]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Effect of edge trees on harvester positioning in thinning , 2006 .

[19]  Hannu Salminen,et al.  Timing and intensity of precommercial thinning in Pinus sylvestris stands , 2004 .

[20]  R. M. Newnham A SIMULATION MODEL FOR STUDYING THE EFFECT OF STAND STRUCTURE ON HARVESTING PATTERN , 1966 .

[21]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Analyzing and Estimating Delays in Harvester Operations , 2008 .

[22]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  Simulating Cut-to-Length Harvesting Operations in Appalachian Hardwoods , 2005 .

[23]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Simulation study of a single-grip harvester in thinning from below and thinning from above , 1999 .

[24]  B. Brunberg,et al.  Basic data for productivity standards for single-grip harvesters in thinning , 1989 .

[25]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Simulation of geometric thinning systems and their time requirements for young forests , 2007 .

[26]  Bruce Talbot,et al.  Analysis of Two Simulated In-field Chipping and Extraction Systems in Spruce Thinnings , 2005 .

[27]  Tomas Gullberg A Deductive Time Consumption Model for Loading Shortwood , 2013 .

[28]  L. D. Kellogg,et al.  Simulating a harvester-forwarder softwood thinning : A software evaluation , 1997 .

[29]  H. Ovaskainen Timber harvester operators’ working technique in first thinning and the importance of cognitive abilities on work productivity , 2009 .

[30]  Kari Hyytiäinen,et al.  Optimum juvenile density, harvesting and stand structure in even-aged Scots pine stands , 2005 .

[31]  Jaakko Heinonen,et al.  Operational efficiency and damage to sawlogs by feed rollers of the harvester head. , 2010 .

[32]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Characteristics and Significance of a Harvester Operators’ Working Technique in Thinnings , 2004 .

[33]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Techniques and Systems for Boom- Corridor Thinning in Young Dense Forests , 2009 .