Activating the potential of decentralized flexibility and energy resources to increase the EV hosting capacity: A case study of a multi-stakeholder local electricity system in Norway

Abstract The increasing amount of flexible load in the energy system represents both a challenge and an opportunity. One primary source of load growth is the electrification of the transport sector and the subsequent charging of electric vehicles, which is a load type that can potentially adjust their load profiles. However, to activate the full potential of end-user flexibility, it is necessary to develop pricing mechanisms that can promote efficient load responses on a larger scale. In this paper, a trading mechanism is proposed and analysed within a capacity-based grid tariff scheme by formulating a game-theoretic framework that includes decentralized decision-making by self-interest pursuing end-users. The model is applied to a real-world case in Norway, and it is demonstrated how electrification of vehicles can be achieved with the existing infrastructure. It is found that capacity-based grid tariffs have a limited ability to reduce the coincident peak load in the system since they mainly incentivize individual peak load reductions. However, by including a capacity trading mechanism within the capacity-based tariff structure, we demonstrate that it is possible to increase the value of flexibility since the flexible end-users are incentivized to coordinate their flexibility dispatch with other stakeholders.

[1]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Energy Storage Sharing in Smart Grid: A Modified Auction-Based Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Smart control for minimizing distribution network reinforcement cost due to electrification , 2013 .

[3]  Asgeir Tomasgard,et al.  Comparing individual and coordinated demand response with dynamic and static power grid tariffs , 2020 .

[4]  Amir Abdollahi,et al.  The energy hub: An extensive survey on the state-of-the-art , 2019, Applied Thermal Engineering.

[5]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Interaction of DSO and local energy systems through network tariffs , 2019, 2019 16th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[6]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of Energy Hubs: A Comprehensive Review , 2019, Inventions.

[7]  G. Doorman,et al.  Capacity subscription: solving the peak demand challenge in electricity markets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Steven A. Gabriel,et al.  A Stochastic MPEC Approach for Grid Tariff Design with Demand Side Flexibility , 2020 .

[9]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Three-Party Energy Management With Distributed Energy Resources in Smart Grid , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  K. Bell,et al.  Delivering a highly distributed electricity system: technical, regulatory and policy challenges , 2018 .

[11]  L. Meeus,et al.  Future-Proof Tariff Design: Recovering Sunk Grid Costs in a World Where Consumers are Pushing Back , 2017 .

[12]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Towards an energy sustainable community: An energy system analysis for a village in Switzerland , 2014 .

[13]  S. Gabriel,et al.  An SOS1-Based Approach for Solving MPECs with a Natural Gas Market Application , 2013 .

[14]  R. Hledik,et al.  The distributional impacts of residential demand charges , 2016 .

[15]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Helping end-users help each other: Coordinating development and operation of distributed resources through local power markets and grid tariffs , 2020 .

[16]  Paul Simshauser Distribution network prices and solar PV: Resolving rate instability and wealth transfers through demand tariffs , 2016 .

[17]  Magnus Askeland,et al.  Peer-to-peer trading under subscribed capacity tariffs - an equilibrium approach , 2020, 2020 17th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[18]  Lena Hansen,et al.  Distributed Energy Resources: Policy Implications of Decentralization , 2013 .

[19]  Tim Schittekatte,et al.  Least-Cost Distribution Network Tariff Design in Theory and Practice , 2018, Energy Journal.

[20]  Iana Vassileva,et al.  Adoption barriers for electric vehicles: Experiences from early adopters in Sweden , 2017 .

[21]  Bethany L. Nicholson,et al.  Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints , 2021, Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python.

[22]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Price Discrimination for Energy Trading in Smart Grid: A Game Theoretic Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data , 2016 .

[24]  Magnus Askeland,et al.  Zero energy at the neighbourhood scale: Regulatory challenges regarding billing practices in Norway , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[25]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Balancing Power Demand Through EV Mobility in Vehicle-to-Grid Mobile Energy Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[26]  T. Hamacher,et al.  The Impact of Network Tariffs on PV Investment Decisions by Consumers , 2018, 2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[27]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Operational and Structural Optimization of Multi-Carrier Energy Systems ¤ , 2006 .

[28]  Lars Wederhake,et al.  The influence of electric vehicle charging strategies on the sizing of electrical energy storage systems in charging hub microgrids , 2020 .

[29]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Electric Vehicle Charge Scheduling Mechanism to Maximize Cost Efficiency and User Convenience , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[30]  C. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Demand side management of electric car charging: Benefits for consumer and grid , 2012 .

[31]  Yannick Perez,et al.  Network tariff design with prosumers and electromobility: Who wins, who loses? , 2019, Energy Economics.

[32]  Kristina Orehounig,et al.  Integration of decentralized energy systems in neighbourhoods using the energy hub approach , 2015 .