Actors, resources, activities and commitments

Abstract A new concept, commitments, is introduced and defined as “agreements between two or more social actors to carry out future actions” and its incorporation into, and articulation of, the actors–resources–activities model described. Commitments are distinguished from the concept of commitment as traditionally used in inter-organisational relationships. The latter is mainly an affective measure at the level of an individual concerning the general relationship between buying and selling organisations. By contrast commitments are agreements made between actors and range from the specific and everyday to the general and strategic. The theoretical background and nature of commitments are described and how commitments relate to and enrich each of the elements of the ARA model demonstrated. The application of the concept to B2B relationships at the level of individual, group, organisational and net actors is set out and implications of the use of the commitments concept for researchers and managers are suggested.

[1]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  The deep structure of business processes , 2006, CACM.

[2]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[3]  Peter Tyson,et al.  Artificial societies , 1997 .

[4]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[5]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  The hospital in modern society , 1963 .

[6]  Donna M. Randall,et al.  The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation , 1990 .

[7]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .

[8]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Communicative action‐based business process and information systems modelling with DEMO , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  J. Ford,et al.  The Role Of Conversations in Producing Intentional Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[10]  Nicolas Ducheneaut,et al.  In Search of Coherence: A Review of E-Mail Research , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Brad Hartfield,et al.  Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction , 1988, TOIS.

[12]  Penelope Frow.  The meaning of commitment in professional service relationships: a study of the meaning of commitment used by lawyers and their clients , 2007 .

[13]  Richard Fikes,et al.  A Commitment-Based Framework for Describing Informal Cooperative Work* , 1982 .

[14]  Munindar P. Singh.  An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[15]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[16]  Deirdre Boden,et al.  The Business of Talk , 1994 .

[17]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[18]  Terry Winograd.  A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work , 1987, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  D. Samra-Fredericks,et al.  An Analysis of the Behavioural Dynamics of Corporate Governance – a talk‐based ethnography of a UK manufacturing ‘board‐in‐action’ , 2000 .

[20]  J. Searle.  Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[21]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[22]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems , 1993, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[23]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Engineering Social Order , 2000, ESAW.

[24]  D. L. Marples.  Studies of Managers — A Fresh Start? , 1967, Managerial Work.

[25]  G. Spanier,et al.  The End of Marriage and Acceptance of Marital Termination. , 1983 .

[26]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Relationships and Networks in International Markets , 1998 .

[27]  Michal Antkiewicz,et al.  Multi-level customization in application engineering , 2006, CACM.

[28]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[29]  T. Watson,et al.  Managing, Crafting and Researching: Words, Skill and Imagination in Shaping Management Research , 1994 .

[30]  Steve Whittaker.  Supporting collaborative task management in e-mail , 2005 .

[31]  Fernando Flores,et al.  DOING AND SPEAKING IN THE OFFICE , 1980 .

[32]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Introduction : Rethinking marketing , 2004 .

[33]  Brian Bemmels.  Dual commitment: Unique construct or epiphenomenon? , 1995 .

[34]  R. Roe,et al.  Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  Profiles of commitment: An empirical test , 1993 .

[36]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations , 1984 .

[37]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Idea Logics and Network Theory in Business Marketing , 2002 .

[38]  H. Håkansson,et al.  A Model of Industrial Networks , 1992 .

[39]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[40]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[41]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  The theory of social functions: challenges for computational social science and multi-agent learning , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[42]  Colin Hales,et al.  Why do Managers Do What They Do? Reconciling Evidence and Theory in Accounts of Managerial Work , 1999 .

[43]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[44]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Artificial Societies , 2003 .

[45]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Modeling Social Action for AI Agents , 1997, IJCAI.