Improvement of Zwicker’s psychoacoustic annoyance model aiming at tonal noises

Abstract According to 4 acoustical parameters of noise samples (i.e., loudness, sharpness, fluctuation strength and roughness), Zwicker’s psychoacoustic annoyance model can be used to estimate the relative degree of noise annoyance. However, this model cannot be well applied to compare the annoyance degrees of tonal noises and atonal noises. In order to improve its estimation effect on tonal noises, 3 groups of noise samples were selected randomly, i.e., 27 low-frequency tonal noise samples induced by a 1000 kV transformer with A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels ranging from 41.2 dBA to 73.0 dBA; 30 low-, mid- or high-frequency tonal/atonal noise samples with loudness levels ranging from 60 phon to 80 phon; and 60 other noise samples with A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels ranging from 40.7 dBA to 75.0 dBA. Laboratory listening tests were conducted on the above 3 sample groups respectively via an 11-point numerical scale. The Zwicker’s psychoacoustic annoyance model was improved by taking tonality into account, and introducing the evaluation result of the first noise sample group (1000 kV transformer noise samples) to determine the coefficients in the model. The applicability of the improved model was examined by the evaluation results of the other two groups as well as the data in a previous research on annoyance of 220 kV/500 kV transformer noises. Results show that the improved model can estimate the relative annoyance degrees caused by various types of tonal/atonal noises much more accurately.

[1]  K. Paunović,et al.  Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. , 2009, Environment international.

[2]  Kyoung Hoon Lee Perception of tones in machinery noise and its influence on annoyance , 2006 .

[3]  Di Guo-qing The analysis of noise frequency characters of facilities in urban residential area , 2006 .

[4]  E. Pedersen,et al.  Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise--a dose-response relationship. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H. Miedema,et al.  Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[8]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Varying the spectral envelope of air-conditioning sounds to enhance indoor acoustic comfort , 2011 .

[9]  Catherine Marquis-Favre,et al.  Noise and its effects - : A review on qualitative aspects of sound. Part I: Notions and acoustic ratings , 2005 .

[10]  R F Job,et al.  Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  T. J. Schultz Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Pyoung Jik Lee,et al.  Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Guo-Qing Di,et al.  Annoyance response to low frequency noise with tonal components: A case study on transformer noise , 2015 .

[14]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  C. Marquis-Favre,et al.  Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Guski Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. , 1999, Noise & health.

[17]  Aaron Lee Hastings Sound quality of diesel engines , 2004 .

[18]  M. Nilsson A-weighted sound pressure level as an indicator of short-term loudness or annoyance of road-traffic sound , 2007 .

[19]  A. Dudarewicz,et al.  Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions. , 2010, Noise & health.

[20]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Exposure levels, tonal components, and noise annoyance in working environments , 1995 .

[21]  H M Miedema,et al.  Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  E. Premat,et al.  Noise and its effects - : A review on qualitative aspects of sound. Part II: Noise and annoyance , 2005 .

[23]  Soogab Lee,et al.  The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Soogab Lee,et al.  Effect of background noise levels on community annoyance from aircraft noise. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.