Neuronal tissue polarization induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?

In a blinded cross-over design, 10 healthy controls received 900 monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimuli over the primary motor cortex. Stimulation frequency was 1 Hz, and stimulation intensity 90% of the individual resting motor threshold. Suprathreshold stimuli applied at 0.1 Hz before and after repetitive stimulation controlled for changes in corticospinal excitability. We found a lasting corticospinal inhibition that was significantly more pronounced after monophasic than after biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (motor evoked potential amplitude reduced by 35 ± 20%vs 12 ± 37%, mean± s.d.). We propose that the current flow in the coil plays a significant role in optimising after effects, and asymmetric current flow may be particularly efficient in building up tissue polarization.

[1]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[2]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Barker,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Paired-pulse repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Sarah H Lisanby,et al.  Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  H. Topka,et al.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[9]  M. Hallett,et al.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer’s cramp , 1999, Neurology.

[11]  D M Durand,et al.  Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  R. Hari,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of sensorimotor neuromagnetic rhythms related to thumb movement , 1994, Neuroscience.

[15]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Deleterious effects of prolonged electrical excitation of striate cortex in macaques. , 1977, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[16]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[17]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  G L Romani,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence of synchronized spontaneous activity in the brain following repetitive sensory stimulation. , 1987, The International journal of neuroscience.