The Least at least Can Do
暂无分享,去创建一个
(8) If a speaker utters p or q, it is implied that (i) in all of the speaker’s doxastic alternatives q∨ p, and (ii-a) not in all p, and (ii-b) not in all q. ∗I’d like to thank the audiences at WCCFL 2007 at UC Berkeley, at SFIPtip at the Dept. of Spanish, French, Italian & Portuguese at the University of Illinois, Chicago, my UCLA Semantics II class, and in particular Elena Guerzoni and Martin Hackl for helpful comments and pointers. Thanks, too, to Bart Geurts for making the manuscript of Geurts and Nouwen (2007) available to me.
[1] B. Geurts,et al. At least et al: The semantic of scalar modifiers , 2007 .
[2] M. Krifka. At least some Determiners aren ’ t Determiners , 1999 .
[3] Bernhard Schwarz,et al. On the Syntax of either...or , 1999 .
[4] Danny Fox,et al. The universal density of measurement , 2007 .
[5] Richard K. Larson,et al. On the syntax of disjunction scope , 1985 .
[6] I. Heim. Degree Operators and Scope , 2000 .