Reducing sample sizes in genome scans: Group sequential study designs with futility stops

Group sequential study designs can greatly facilitate analyses of genetic linkage in complex traits. We recently proposed designs allowing stopping investigations early if the result is significant (König et al. [2001] Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69:590–600), thereby decreasing average sample sizes under the alternative hypothesis. However, average sample sizes were slightly increased under the null hypothesis. We now present designs where the analysis of markers is additionally stopped in case of futility, i.e., if the probability for significant results is sufficiently low. These sequential designs are applied to linkage analyses of single loci. We calculated sample sizes, time points, and critical boundaries for all analyses for 2‐ and 3‐stage designs at an overall significance level of 0.0001. To confirm the validity of asymptotic approximations, Monte Carlo simulations were performed. The utility is demonstrated analyzing genome scan data provided for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 12. Application of the novel sequential designs yields tremendous decreases in average sample sizes, regardless of the size of the underlying genetic effect at investigated loci. Depending on the applied design, almost half of the sample size is spared on average. These enormous savings are expected to have a special impact on costs and time of large‐scale studies such as genome scans. Genet Epidemiol 25:339–349, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Group sequential designs for one-sided and two-sided hypothesis testing with provision for early stopping in favor of the null hypothesis , 1994 .

[2]  Blackwelder Wc,et al.  A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci , 1985 .

[3]  M. Knapp Even a deficit of shared marker alleles in affected sib pairs can yield evidence for linkage. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  R. Elston,et al.  Two‐stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: Use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[5]  R. Elston,et al.  Two‐stage global search designs for linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives , 1996 .

[6]  N. Risch Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  A Ziegler,et al.  Optimized group sequential study designs for tests of genetic linkage and association in complex diseases. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  C. Gu,et al.  Optimum study designs. , 2001, Advances in genetics.

[9]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[10]  A. Lawrence Gould,et al.  Group sequential methods for clinical trials allowing early acceptance of Ho and incorporating costs , 1982 .

[11]  M. Wjst,et al.  A Genome-wide Search for Linkage to Asthma , 1999 .

[12]  C. Ober,et al.  Description of Three Data Sets: Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Asthma (CSGA), the German Affected‐Sib‐Pair Study, and the Hutterites of South Dakota , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  R. Elston,et al.  Two‐stage global search designs for linkage analysis II: Including discordant relative pairs in the study , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  L Kruglyak,et al.  Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  Sequential Designs for Genetic Epidemiological Linkage or Association Studies A Review of the Literature , 2001 .

[16]  L. Heston,et al.  Novel association approach for determining the genetic predisposition to schizophrenia: case-control resource and testing of a candidate gene. , 1993, American journal of medical genetics.

[17]  Hans-Helge Müller,et al.  Optimization of testing times and critical values in sequential equivalence testing. , 1999 .