Control of bacterial biofilm growth on surfaces by nanostructural mechanics and geometry

Surface-associated communities of bacteria, called biofilms, pervade natural and anthropogenic environments. Mature biofilms are resistant to a wide range of antimicrobial treatments and therefore pose persistent pathogenic threats. The use of surface chemistry to inhibit biofilm growth has been found to only transiently affect initial attachment. In this work, we investigate the tunable effects of physical surface properties, including high-aspect-ratio (HAR) surface nanostructure arrays recently reported to induce long-range spontaneous spatial patterning of bacteria on the surface. The functional parameters and length scale regimes that control such artificial patterning for the rod-shaped pathogenic species Pseudomonas aeruginosa are elucidated through a combinatorial approach. We further report a crossover regime of biofilm growth on a HAR nanostructured surface versus the nanostructure effective stiffness. When the 'softness' of the hair-like nanoarray is increased beyond a threshold value, biofilm growth is inhibited as compared to a flat control surface. This result is consistent with the mechanoselective adhesion of bacteria to surfaces. Therefore by combining nanoarray-induced bacterial patterning and modulating the effective stiffness of the nanoarray--thus mimicking an extremely compliant flat surface--bacterial mechanoselective adhesion can be exploited to control and inhibit biofilm growth.

[1]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  Bacteria pattern spontaneously on periodic nanostructure arrays. , 2010, Nano letters.

[2]  H. Suh,et al.  Bacterial adhesion on PEG modified polyurethane surfaces. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[3]  E Ben-Jacob,et al.  Cooperative organization of bacterial colonies: from genotype to morphotype. , 1998, Annual review of microbiology.

[4]  Lauren D. Zarzar,et al.  Structural transformation by electrodeposition on patterned substrates (STEPS): a new versatile nanofabrication method. , 2012, Nano letters.

[5]  A. Gristina Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. 1987. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[7]  D. Cardo,et al.  Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002 , 2007, Public health reports.

[8]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Self-assembled organic monolayers: model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces , 1991, Science.

[9]  Alexander K. Epstein,et al.  Fabrication of Bioinspired Actuated Nanostructures with Arbitrary Geometry and Stiffness , 2009 .

[10]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[11]  J. Shapiro Thinking about bacterial populations as multicellular organisms. , 1998, Annual review of microbiology.

[12]  Søren Molin,et al.  Involvement of bacterial migration in the development of complex multicellular structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[13]  K. V. Van Vliet,et al.  Substrata mechanical stiffness can regulate adhesion of viable bacteria. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[14]  Roberto Kolter,et al.  Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. , 2008, Genes & development.

[15]  D. Davies,et al.  Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  Adam W Feinberg,et al.  Engineered antifouling microtopographies – effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the green alga Ulva , 2007, Biofouling.

[17]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[18]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Retention of bacteria on a substratum surface with micro-patterned hydrophobicity. , 2000, FEMS microbiology letters.

[19]  G. O’Toole,et al.  Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics , 2000, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[20]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.

[21]  Philip S. Stewart,et al.  Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[22]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. , 1999, Science.

[23]  M. Mulvey,et al.  Bacterial landlines: contact-dependent signaling in bacterial populations. , 2009, Current opinion in microbiology.

[24]  Molly M Stevens,et al.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. , 2011, Science.

[25]  A. Gristina,et al.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. , 1987, Science.

[26]  P. Marsh Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[27]  Ravi S Kane,et al.  Antifouling Coatings: Recent Developments in the Design of Surfaces That Prevent Fouling by Proteins, Bacteria, and Marine Organisms , 2011, Advanced materials.

[28]  T. Neu Significance of bacterial surface-active compounds in interaction of bacteria with interfaces. , 1996, Microbiological reviews.

[29]  Alexander K. Epstein,et al.  Bacterial biofilm shows persistent resistance to liquid wetting and gas penetration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. Trevors Silver resistance and accumulation in bacteria , 1987 .