Learners’ use of communication strategies in text-based and video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication environments: opportunities for language learning

This study investigates the different learning opportunities enabled by text-based and video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) from an interactionist perspective. Six Chinese-speaking learners of English and six English-speaking learners of Chinese were paired up as tandem (reciprocal) learning dyads. Each dyad participated in four kinds of interactions, namely, English text-based SCMC, Chinese text-based SCMC, English video-based SCMC and Chinese video-based SCMC. Their use of communication strategies (CSs) were analyzed along with an after-task questionnaire and with stimulated reflection to explore systematically and comprehensively the differences between text-based and video-based SCMC. In addition to the main role of qualitative analysis, the quantitative analysis was undertaken to provide an overview of the relative frequencies of the occurrence of the different strategies and to understand their distribution in the different conditions. A MANOVA was applied to understand to what extent the differences are likely to have occurred by chance. The results showed that learners used CSs differently in text-based and video-based SCMC and indicated different learning opportunities provided by these two modes of SCMC. While text-based SCMC appears to have greater potential for learning target-like language forms, video-based SCMC seems particularly effective for fluency development as well as pronunciation improvement.

[1]  Ursula Stickler,et al.  The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom , 2012, ReCALL.

[2]  Lina Lee,et al.  FOCUS-ON-FORM THROUGH COLLABORATIVE SCAFFOLDING IN EXPERT-TO-NOVICE ONLINE INTERACTION , 2008 .

[3]  Lina Lee,et al.  Enhancing Learners' Communication Skills through Synchronous Electronic Interaction and Task‐Based Instruction , 2002 .

[4]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[5]  Keiko Kitade,et al.  L2 Learners' Discourse and SLA Theories in CMC: Collaborative Interaction in Internet Chat , 2000 .

[6]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .

[7]  Bryan Smith,et al.  Methodological Hurdles in Capturing CMC Data: The Case of the Missing Self-Repair. , 2008 .

[8]  Lina Lee,et al.  Online interaction: negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish , 2001, ReCALL.

[9]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[10]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning , 2006, ReCALL.

[11]  Celeste Kinginger.  Videoconferencing as Access to Spoken French , 1999 .

[12]  Z. Dörnyei,et al.  Review Article Communication Strategies in a Second Language: Definitions and Taxonomies , 1997 .

[13]  M. Shekary,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning and Noticing in Text‐Based Online Chat , 2006 .

[14]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[15]  Sandra J. Savignon,et al.  Sociocultural Strategies for a Dialogue of Cultures , 2002 .

[16]  Christoph Zähner,et al.  Network-based Language Teaching: Task-based language learning via audiovisual networks: The LEVERAGE project , 2000 .

[17]  J. Guilford.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[18]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[19]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  Learner Use of Strategies in Interaction: Typology and Teachability* , 1991 .

[20]  Alireza Jamshidnejad.  Functional approach to communication strategies: An analysis of language learners’ performance in interactional discourse , 2011 .

[21]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Corrective Feedback via Instant Messenger Learning Activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS Dyads , 2013 .

[22]  Etsuko Toyoda,et al.  Categorization of Text Chat Communication between Learners and Native Speakers of Japanese. , 2002 .

[23]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Noticing and Text-Based Chat , 2006 .

[24]  Mark Peterson.  Learner interaction in synchronous CMC: a sociocultural perspective , 2009 .

[25]  Hanaa Khamis,et al.  Communication Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Egyptian EFL Context* , 2010 .

[26]  LANGUAGE CHOICE AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES IN LEARNERS’ SOCIAL NETWORKS A CASE STUDY OF AN AUSTRALIAN LEARNER OF JAPANESE , 2016 .

[27]  Susan C. Herring.  Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Richard G. Kern.  Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production , 1995 .

[29]  Orlando R. Kelm.  The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language Instruction: A Preliminary Report , 1992 .

[30]  E. Tarone.  COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES, FOREIGNER TALK, AND REPAIR IN INTERLANGUAGE 1 , 1980 .

[31]  W. Holtzman.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. , 1951 .

[32]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  On the Teachability of Communication Strategies , 1995 .

[33]  Mark Darhower.  Interactional Features of Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in the Intermediate L2 Class: A Sociocultural Case Study , 2013 .

[34]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[35]  Michael H. Long.  Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1 , 1983 .

[36]  M. Freiermuth,et al.  Bringing Japan and Taiwan closer electronically: A look at an intercultural online synchronic chat task and its effect on motivation , 2012 .

[37]  T. Egi.  Uptake, Modified Output, and Learner Perceptions of Recasts: Learner Responses as Language Awareness , 2010 .

[38]  M. Canale.  From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy , 2014 .

[39]  Thomas S. C. Farrell,et al.  The Use of Reception Strategies by Learners of French as a Foreign Language , 2006 .

[40]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Task-based Language Learning and Teaching , 2003 .

[41]  R. Lyster,et al.  CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[42]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[43]  Marianne Gullberg,et al.  Handling Discourse: Gestures, Reference Tracking, and Communication Strategies in Early L2 , 2006 .

[44]  Claudia R. Kost.  Use of communication strategies in a synchronous CMC environment , 2008 .

[45]  R. Schmidt.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Attention , 2001 .

[46]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[47]  Bryan Smith,et al.  The Use of Communication Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2003 .

[48]  Mark R. Freiermuth,et al.  Debating in an online world: a comparative analysis of speaking, writing, and online chat , 2011 .

[49]  Bryan Smith.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATED INTERACTION AND LEXICAL ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[50]  C. Kinginger.  Videoconferencing as Access to Spoken French , 1998 .

[51]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[52]  E. Schegloff.  Discourse as an interactional achievement : Some uses of "Uh huh" and other things that come between sentences , 1982 .