Contacting participants for follow-up: how much effort is required to retain participants in longitudinal studies?

Abstract Participant retention is essential to the success of longitudinal research projects. Locating participants for follow-up is often time consuming and expensive, which may result in researchers limiting their contact efforts for budgetary reasons. Yet if such a protocol is instituted a fair number of participants will likely be lost. This paper examines the impact of restricted persistence on participant retention and selective attrition in longitudinal research. The data was collected from the developmental trends study (DTS), a longitudinal study of the development of disruptive behavior disorders, consisting of 177 clinic-referred boys who were followed from childhood through young adulthood. The results indicated that limiting contact efforts would have resulted in significant participant loss and selective attrition for participants with disruptive behavior disorders. Cost-estimates showed that the extra effort required to retain ‘difficult’ participants was minimal compared to the initial investment in study costs. Implementing systematic and comprehensive approaches to retention will result in favorable retention rates and can be done in a cost-effective manner.

[1]  W. Compton,et al.  Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. , 1996, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[2]  J. F. Bell,et al.  Data Quality on Longitudinal Research , 1992 .

[3]  R. Loeber,et al.  Innovative Retention Methods in Longitudinal Research: A Case Study of the Developmental Trends Study , 2002 .

[4]  M. Drake.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) , 1988 .

[5]  Cris M. Sullivan,et al.  Retaning Participants in Longitudinal Community Research: A Comprehensive Protocol , 1996 .

[6]  R. Loeber,et al.  Findings on Disruptive Behavior Disorders from the First Decade of the Developmental Trends Study , 2000, Clinical child and family psychology review.

[7]  N. Lambert,et al.  Tracking procedures and attrition containment in a long-term follow-up of a community-based ADHD sample. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[8]  D. Bowen,et al.  Enhancing adherence in randomized controlled clinical trials. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[9]  S. Flick.  Managing attrition in clinical research , 1988 .

[10]  Judith L. Navratil,et al.  Minimizing subject loss in a longitudinal study of deviant behavior , 1994 .

[11]  F. Verhulst,et al.  Accelerating longitudinal research on child psychopathology: A practical example. , 1994 .

[12]  K. Polk,et al.  The Implications of Respondent Loss in Panel Studies of Deviant Behavior , 1983 .

[13]  Problems and Solutions in Longitudinal and Experimental Treatment Studies of Child Psychopathology and Delinquency. , 1994 .

[14]  F B Hu,et al.  Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[15]  W. Eaton,et al.  Psychopathology and attrition in the Baltimore ECA 15-year follow-up 1981–1996 , 1999, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[16]  B. Eckland.  RETRIEVING MOBILE CASES IN LONGITUDINAL SURVEYS , 1968 .

[17]  R. Loeber,et al.  The Nuts and Bolts of Implementing Large-Scale Longitudinal Studies , 1992, Violence and Victims.

[18]  G. Patterson,et al.  An approach to the problem of recruitment and retention rates for longitudinal research. , 1987 .

[19]  T. Ollendick,et al.  Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of internalizing problems in children: the role of longitudinal data. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Minimising attrition in longitudinal research: methods in tracing and securing cooperation in a 24-year follow-up study , 1990 .

[21]  L. Davis,et al.  Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials. , 2002, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[22]  Judith L. Navratil,et al.  Potential dropouts in a longitudinal study: Prevalence, stability, and associated characteristics , 1994 .

[23]  M. Hovell,et al.  Tracking and follow-up of 16,915 adolescents: minimizing attrition bias. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[24]  J. Goethe,et al.  Characteristics of people lost to attrition in psychiatric follow-up studies. , 2001, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[25]  R. Prinz,et al.  Recruitment and retention of participants in prevention trials involving family-based interventions. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[26]  M. Sevick,et al.  Challenges faced in recruiting patients from primary care practices into a physical activity intervention trial. Activity Counseling Trial Research Group. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[27]  D. Desmond,et al.  Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. , 1995, Journal of substance abuse treatment.