Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Simple Summary Immunotherapy targets patients’ immune systems to fight cancer. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess tumor response to pre-operative immunotherapy and predict pathologic complete response using MRI at an early treatment time- point. Based on our analysis with a cohort from the multi-center I-SPY 2 clinical trial, we found diffusion-weighted MRI is superior to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, where the latter is a standard and most-commonly used MRI modality, in assessing immunotherapy, while no significant difference was observed in the control cohort where only standard chemotherapy was provided. Abstract This study tested the hypothesis that a change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured in diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is an independent imaging marker, and ADC performs better than functional tumor volume (FTV) for assessing treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. A total of 249 patients were randomized to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (pembro) or without pembrolizumab (control). DCE-MRI and DWI, performed prior to and 3 weeks after the start of treatment, were analyzed. Percent changes of tumor ADC metrics (mean, 5th to 95th percentiles of ADC histogram) and FTV were evaluated for the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) using a logistic regression model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) estimated for the percent change in mean ADC was higher in the pembro cohort (0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.93) than in the control cohort (0.63, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.83). In the control cohort, the percent change of the 95th percentile ADC achieved the highest AUC, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.85). In the pembro cohort, the percent change of the 25th percentile ADC achieved the highest AUC, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55 to 0.95). AUCs estimated for percent change of FTV were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.83) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.85) for the pembro and control cohorts, respectively. Tumor ADC may perform better than FTV to predict pCR at an early treatment time-point during neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

[1]  L. Esserman,et al.  Effect of Inter-Reader Variability on Diffusion-Weighted MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response for Breast Cancer , 2022, Tomography.

[2]  M. Ignatiadis,et al.  Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in breast cancer: a paradigm shift? , 2020, Ecancermedicalscience.

[3]  J. Vilanova,et al.  Assessing Immunotherapy with Functional and Molecular Imaging and Radiomics. , 2020, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  D. Berry,et al.  Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence-Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer: Three-Year Follow-up Analysis for the I-SPY2 Adaptively Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[5]  P. Fasching,et al.  Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of Pembrolizumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Complete Response in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the Ongoing Phase 2 Adaptively Randomized I-SPY2 Trial. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[7]  S. Katz,et al.  Challenges in assessing solid tumor responses to immunotherapy , 2019, Cancer Gene Therapy.

[8]  L. Esserman,et al.  Additive value of diffusion‐weighted MRI in the I‐SPY 2 TRIAL , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Jinming Yu,et al.  The potential mechanism, recognition and clinical significance of tumor pseudoprogression after immunotherapy , 2019, Cancer biology & medicine.

[10]  Lei Zhan,et al.  How to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. , 2019, American journal of cancer research.

[11]  Vanessa M. Hubbard-Lucey,et al.  Immunotherapy and targeted therapy combinations in metastatic breast cancer. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Zheng Zhang,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI Findings Predict Pathologic Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: The ACRIN 6698 Multicenter Trial. , 2018, Radiology.

[13]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer (BC): Results from I-SPY 2. , 2017 .

[14]  M. Kiehl,et al.  New drugs, new toxicities: severe side effects of modern targeted and immunotherapy of cancer and their management , 2017, Critical Care.

[15]  Noam Nissan,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Wolfgang Bogner,et al.  Investigating the prediction value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2016, European Radiology.

[17]  Erich P Huang,et al.  RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL. , 2016, Radiology.

[19]  M. Burotto,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Taube,et al.  PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. , 2015, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[21]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy: imaging assessment of novel treatment response patterns and immune-related adverse events. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[23]  Geon-Ho Jahng,et al.  True Progression versus Pseudoprogression in the Treatment of Glioblastomas: A Comparison Study of Normalized Cerebral Blood Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient by Histogram Analysis , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[24]  N. Hylton,et al.  High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment response. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[25]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[26]  D. Collins,et al.  Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging--value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. , 2011, Radiology.

[27]  Jie Li,et al.  DW-MRI ADC values can predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, Medical Oncology.

[28]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. , 2010, Radiology.

[29]  D. Berry,et al.  I‐SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[30]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.