Pointer Advanced in silico approaches in antiviral research

Computer-aided drug design has seen constantly increasing application over the past two decades in every area of drug discovery. It can offer significant advantages over conventional approaches, being far less expensive and faster than conventional methods, or offering the possibility to predict molecular behaviours that cannot be elucidated in any other way. Recent developments in software and hardware make it possible to simulate increasingly complex molecular environments, widening the applicability of in silico studies from the interactions of small molecules with key protein residues, to the simulation of the dynamic evolution of complex biological systems with atomic resolution. Antiviral research offers several open challenges, from a biological, biochemical and pharmaceutical point of view. Computational approaches are already providing some answers and will undoubtedly give more in the near future. Here, we present a brief overview of the cutting-edge computational methods that play a major role in present and future antiviral research. Molecular modelling techniques have been playing an increasingly crucial role in the search for new drugs and their optimization, in every area of drug design. Although they were initially confined to the visualization of potential drug interactions in targeted enzyme binding, these techniques are now being applied by many research groups worldwide as a powerful tool to help define the relationship between biological activities, binding geometries and mechanisms of action in physiological or pathological processes. This is clear from the increasing number of literature sources concerned with in silico approaches and the boost in the number of molecular modelling packages, both commercial and non- commercial, available to researchers [1]. The reason for this boost is threefold: the improvement in the mathematical models that describe chemical phenomena, which grants higher-precision results; the increase in the number of proteins with known threedimensional (3D) structure solved through crystallographic or NMR experiments; and the development of cheaper and more powerful hardware. Moreover, the adoption of more intuitive programme interfaces and ergonomic devices, such as haptic styli, has increased the interactivity of the user with the machines [2]. The large range of applications that computer-aided drug design (CADD) methods have acquired confirms that CADD techniques will play a role of increasing importance in drug discovery in the future. The current

[1]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Ensemble-Based Virtual Screening Reveals Potential Novel Antiviral Compounds for Avian Influenza Neuraminidase , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  M. Hutter,et al.  In silico prediction of drug properties. , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.

[3]  David W. Ritchie,et al.  Comparison of Ligand-Based and Receptor-Based Virtual Screening of HIV Entry Inhibitors for the CXCR4 and CCR5 Receptors Using 3D Ligand Shape Matching and Ligand-Receptor Docking , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  A. Hopfinger,et al.  Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism , 1997 .

[5]  D I Stuart,et al.  The VIZIER project: Preparedness against pathogenic RNA viruses , 2007, Antiviral Research.

[6]  Anton J. Hopfinger,et al.  The 4D-QSAR Paradigm: Application to a Novel Set of Non-peptidic HIV Protease Inhibitors , 2002 .

[7]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[8]  Lei Wu,et al.  Protein folding simulations: From coarse‐grained model to all‐atom model , 2009, IUBMB life.

[9]  Guillermo Moyna,et al.  Shape signatures: a new approach to computer-aided ligand- and receptor-based drug design. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  W. L. Jorgensen Efficient Drug Lead Discovery and Optimization , 2009 .

[11]  F. Guerlesquin,et al.  Protein–protein interaction inhibition (2P2I) combining high throughput and virtual screening: Application to the HIV-1 Nef protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Dimitrios Vlachakis,et al.  Discovery of a novel HCV helicase inhibitor by a de novo drug design approach. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[13]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Keynote review: Structural biology and drug discovery , 2005 .

[15]  J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .

[16]  D. M. Ryan,et al.  Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication , 1993, Nature.

[17]  Cornel Catana,et al.  Inhibition of protein–protein interactions: The discovery of druglike β‐catenin inhibitors by combining virtual and biophysical screening , 2006, Proteins.

[18]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Peter Gedeck,et al.  Exploiting QSAR models in lead optimization. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[20]  Santosh Putta,et al.  Shapes of things: computer modeling of molecular shape in drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[21]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  Jordi Mestres,et al.  A molecular-field-based similarity study of non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[23]  Proposed lead molecules against Hemagglutinin of avian influenza virus (H5N1) , 2008, Bioinformation.

[24]  Thomas Herz,et al.  ProPose: a docking engine based on a fully configurable protein–ligand interaction model , 2004, Journal of molecular modeling.

[25]  T. Blundell,et al.  Structural biology and drug discovery. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[26]  Max Dobler,et al.  Multidimensional QSAR: Moving from three‐ to five‐dimensional concepts , 2002 .

[27]  Jaroslaw Polanski,et al.  A 4D-QSAR study on anti-HIV HEPT analogues. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[28]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: a major success of structure-assisted drug design. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[29]  Z. Debyser,et al.  Pharmacophore‐Based Discovery of Small‐Molecule Inhibitors of Protein–Protein Interactions between HIV‐1 Integrase and Cellular Cofactor LEDGF/p75 , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[30]  Paul W Finn,et al.  Ultrafast shape recognition: evaluating a new ligand-based virtual screening technology. , 2009, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[31]  Markus H. J. Seifert,et al.  ProPose: Steered Virtual Screening by Simultaneous Protein-Ligand Docking and Ligand-Ligand Alignment , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[33]  D K Gehlhaar,et al.  De novo design of enzyme inhibitors by Monte Carlo ligand generation. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[34]  R. Kuhn,et al.  Antiviral compounds discovered by virtual screening of small-molecule libraries against dengue virus E protein. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[35]  J. N. Varghese,et al.  Structure of the influenza virus glycoprotein antigen neuraminidase at 2.9 Å resolution , 1983, Nature.

[36]  Johannes C. Hermann,et al.  A combined QM/MM approach to protein--ligand interactions: polarization effects of the HIV-1 protease on selected high affinity inhibitors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[37]  P. Colman Structural basis of antigenic variation: Studies of influenza virus neuraminidase , 1992, Immunology and cell biology.

[38]  Nicola Zonta,et al.  Accessible haptic technology for drug design applications , 2009, Journal of molecular modeling.