Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment

SUMMARY Directional arrays of branched microscopic setae constitute a dry adhesive on the toes of pad-bearing geckos, nature's supreme climbers. Geckos are easily and rapidly able to detach their toes as they climb. There are two known mechanisms of detachment: (1) on the microscale, the seta detaches when the shaft reaches a critical angle with the substrate, and (2) on the macroscale, geckos hyperextend their toes, apparently peeling like tape. This raises the question of how geckos prevent detachment while inverted on the ceiling, where body weight should cause toes to peel and setal angles to increase. Geckos use opposing feet and toes while inverted, possibly to maintain shear forces that prevent detachment of setae or peeling of toes. If detachment occurs by macroscale peeling of toes, the peel angle should monotonically decrease with applied force. In contrast, if adhesive force is limited by microscale detachment of setae at a critical angle, the toe detachment angle should be independent of applied force. We tested the hypothesis that adhesion is increased by shear force in isolated setal arrays and live gecko toes. We also tested the corollary hypotheses that (1) adhesion in toes and arrays is limited as on the microscale by a critical angle, or (2) on the macroscale by adhesive strength as predicted for adhesive tapes. We found that adhesion depended directly on shear force, and was independent of detachment angle. Therefore we reject the hypothesis that gecko toes peel like tape. The linear relation between adhesion and shear force is consistent with a critical angle of release in live gecko toes and isolated setal arrays, and also with our prior observations of single setae. We introduced a new model, frictional adhesion, for gecko pad attachment and compared it to existing models of adhesive contacts. In an analysis of clinging stability of a gecko on an inclined plane each adhesive model predicted a different force control strategy. The frictional adhesion model provides an explanation for the very low detachment forces observed in climbing geckos that does not depend on toe peeling.

[1]  Bebni Charan Mahendra,et al.  Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the Indian house-gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis RÜPpel. Part I , 1936, Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Beni Charan Mahendra Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the indian house-gecko,Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel , 1941, Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences.

[3]  K. Kobe The friction and lubrication of solids , 1951 .

[4]  M. Hecht,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION IN THE LIZARD GENUS ARISTELLIGER , 1952 .

[5]  B. C. Mahendra Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the Indian house-geckoHemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppel , 1953, Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences.

[6]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  The Friction and Lubrication of Solids , 1964 .

[7]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  K. Kendall Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[9]  G. A. D. Briggs,et al.  The effect of tangential force on the contact of elastic solids in adhesion , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  Bernard Roth,et al.  Analysis of Multifingered Hands , 1986 .

[11]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[12]  A. V. Pocius,et al.  Adhesion and Adhesives Technology: An Introduction , 1996 .

[13]  K. Johnson,et al.  Adhesion and friction between a smooth elastic spherical asperity and a plane surface , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  A. Crosby,et al.  Adhesive failure analysis of pressure-sensitive adhesives , 1999 .

[15]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Contact behaviour of tenent setae in attachment pads of the blowfly Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  S. Gorb,et al.  Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  A. Russell Integrative Functional Morphology of the Gekkotan Adhesive System (Reptilia: Gekkota)1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[19]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Gorb,et al.  Tarsal movements in flies during leg attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate. , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[21]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives , 2003 .

[22]  S. Gorb,et al.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR TENACITY ENHANCEMENT BY DIVISION OF CONTACT AREA , 2004 .

[23]  C. Finch Adhesion and adhesives technology—an introduction, 2nd edn. AV Pocius. Carl Hanser Gardener Verlag, Munchen, 2002 , 2004 .

[24]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Robotics in scansorial environments , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[26]  K. Autumn,et al.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Adhesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A Robot that Climbs Walls using Micro-structured Polymer Feet , 2005, CLAWAR.

[29]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos , 2005 .

[30]  R. Full,et al.  Dynamics of geckos running vertically , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  C Majidi,et al.  Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  Properties, Principles, and Parameters of the Gecko Adhesive System , 2006 .

[33]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[34]  James A. Norris,et al.  An introduction to tribology. , 2008, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.