Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads

Tree frogs are remarkable for their capacity to cling to smooth surfaces using large toe pads. The adhesive skin of tree frog toe pads is characterized by peg-studded hexagonal cells separated by deep channels into which mucus glands open. The pads are completely wetted with watery mucus, which led previous authors to suggest that attachment is solely due to capillary and viscous forces generated by the fluid-filled joint between the pad and the substrate. Here, we present evidence from single-toe force measurements, laser tweezer microrheometry of pad mucus and interference reflection microscopy of the contact zone in Litoria caerulea, that tree frog attachment forces are significantly enhanced by close contacts and boundary friction between the pad epidermis and the substrate, facilitated by the highly regular pad microstructure.

[1]  R. A. BALDOCK,et al.  Video camera calibration for optical densitometry , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  D. Green.  Treefrog toe pads: comparative surface morphology using scanning electron microscopy , 1979 .

[3]  S. Granick,et al.  Motions and Relaxations of Confined Liquids , 1991, Science.

[4]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives , 2003 .

[5]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[7]  B. Binks,et al.  Investigation of the Force−Distance Relationship for a Small Liquid Drop Approaching a Liquid−Liquid Interface , 1996 .

[8]  P. Gennes,et al.  Dewetting of a water film between a solid and a rubber , 1994 .

[9]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Gingell,et al.  Interference reflection microscopy. A quantitative theory for image interpretation and its application to cell-substratum separation measurement. , 1979, Biophysical journal.

[11]  A. Roberts,et al.  Squeeze films between rubber and glass , 1971 .

[12]  O. Reynolds.  IV. On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil , 1886, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[13]  Professor Dr. Werner Nachtigall.  Biological Mechanisms of Attachment , 1974, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[14]  David M. Green,et al.  Adhesion and the Toe-pads of Treefrogs , 1981 .

[15]  A. Geim,et al.  Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair , 2003, Nature materials.

[16]  V Radhakrishnan,et al.  Locomotion: dealing with friction. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Microinterferometry: Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Surface Microtopography for Thin-Film and Wetting Studies by Reflection Interference Contrast Microscopy (RICM). , 1998, Applied optics.

[18]  Jun Young Chung,et al.  Roles of discontinuities in bio-inspired adhesive pads , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Werner Baumgartner,et al.  Characterization of Photophysics and Mobility of Single Molecules in a Fluid Lipid Membrane , 1995 .

[20]  S. Emerson,et al.  Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs , 1980 .

[21]  H. Dewitz.  Ueber die Fortbewegung der Thiere an senkrechten, glatten Flächen vermittelst eines Secretes , 2005, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[22]  U. Welsch,et al.  The fine structure of the digital pads of rhacophorid tree frogs , 1974, Cell and Tissue Research.

[23]  S. Gorb,et al.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR TENACITY ENHANCEMENT BY DIVISION OF CONTACT AREA , 2004 .

[24]  O. Reynolds.  I. On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil , 1886, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[25]  Steve Granick,et al.  Hydrophobicity at a Janus Interface , 2002, Science.

[26]  Gilbert D. West,et al.  On the resistance to the motion of a thread of mercury in a glass tube , 1911 .

[27]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  S. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny , 2001 .

[30]  V. Ernst,et al.  The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. II. The mucous glands. , 1973, Tissue & cell.

[31]  Barnes W.J.P.,et al.  BIONICS AND WET GRIP , 2004 .

[32]  V. Ernst,et al.  The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. I. The epidermis. , 1973, Tissue & cell.

[33]  H. Tanke,et al.  Reflection contrast microscopy , 2004, Histochemistry.

[34]  T. Endlein,et al.  Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[35]  B. Persson,et al.  Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications , 1997 .