Research Professors' Self-Assessment of Competencies

Research professors develop scientific products that impact and benefit society, but their competencies in doing so are rarely evaluated. Therefore, employing a mixed two-stage sequential design, this study developed a self-assessment model of research professors’ competencies with four domains, seven competencies, and 30 competency elements. Next, we conducted descriptive statistical analysis of those elements. In the first year, 320 respondents rated themselves on four levels: initial, basic, autonomous, and consolidated. In the assessment model’s second year, we compared 30 respondents’ results with those of their initial self-assessment. The main developmental challenge was Originality and Innovation, which remained at the initial level. Both Training of Researchers and Transformation of Society were at the basic level, and Digital Competency was at the autonomous level. Both Teaching Competence and Ethics and Citizenship attained the consolidated level. This information helps establish priorities for accelerating researchers’ training and the quality of their research.

[1]  Alison Hodge Review of progress in implementing the recommendations of Sir Gareth Roberts regarding employability and career development of PhD students and research staff:A report for Research Councils UK by an independent review panel October 2010 , 2010 .

[2]  Eckhard Klieme,et al.  Current Issues in Competence Modeling and Assessment , 2008 .

[3]  Avery L. Culbertson,et al.  An Investigation Into Mentoring Practices of Faculty Who Mentor Undergraduate Researchers at a Hispanic Serving Institution , 2017 .

[4]  Kim A. Stewart,et al.  A New Tool for Identifying Research Standards and Evaluating Research Performance , 2012 .

[5]  C. Noble,et al.  In Search of Eminence: A Personal Brand-Building Perspective on the Achievement of Scholarly Prominence in Marketing , 2010 .

[6]  S. Bögeholz,et al.  Assessing Teaching and Assessment Competences of Biology Teacher Trainees: Lessons from Item Development. , 2014 .

[7]  Jelena Maksimović,et al.  DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHERS’ COMPETENCE FOR ITS APPLICATION IN THE CLASSROOM , 2016 .

[8]  Cipto Wardoyo The Measurement of Teacher’s Personality Competence and Performance Using Embedded Model , 2015 .

[9]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[10]  Veronica S. Walker El trabajo docente en la universidad: condiciones, dimensiones y tensiones , 2016 .

[11]  Azucena Leticia Herrera Aguado Decálogo De Competencias y Sus Indicadores Para Gestión De Capital Humano Universitario , 2018 .

[12]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[13]  G. Hughes Developing student research capability for a ‘post-truth’ world: three challenges for integrating research across taught programmes , 2019, Teaching in Higher Education.

[14]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  A FURTHER NOTE ON TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1951 .

[15]  I. Roque,et al.  METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN , 2019, Cultura de emprendimiento corporativo en las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas colombianas.

[16]  François Lasnier,et al.  Réussir la formation par compétences , 2000 .