Stereopsis from Interocular Spatial Frequency Differences is Not Robust

Based on data obtained using one-dimensional noise patterns, Tyler & Sutter (1979). (Vision Research, 19, 859-865) concluded that stereoscopic tilt can result from an interocular spatial frequency difference in the absence of consistent horizontal disparity. We tested stereopsis using two-dimensional random-dot patterns that were bandpass filtered to contain 1.0 octave bands of spatial frequency with means that differed between the two eyes. With vertical, one-dimensional stimuli we replicated the results of Tyler and Sutter. However, stereoscopic tilt was not perceived based on spatial frequency differences alone when the monocular images contained as little as a +/- 14 deg range of orientation variation. In addition, model simulations demonstrate that the modest steroscopic performance produced by interocular spatial frequency differences in one-dimensional noise patterns are predicted by random disparity correlations at the pattern edges. The observations lead to the conclusion that stereopsis from frequency differences in the absence of pointwise disparity correlations does not reflect a special processing capability of human vision but is an artifact associated with one-dimensional stimuli. As such, it plays no role in steroscopic analysis of the natural environment.

[1]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of human stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[2]  Vincent P. Ferrera,et al.  Perceived speed of moving two-dimensional patterns , 1991, Vision Research.

[3]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[5]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Limits of binocular fusion in the short wave sensitive (“blue”) cones , 1988, Vision Research.

[6]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  A stereoscopic view of visual processing streams , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[9]  J P Frisby,et al.  PMF: A Stereo Correspondence Algorithm Using a Disparity Gradient Limit , 1985, Perception.

[10]  C. Tyler,et al.  Depth from spatial frequency difference: An old kind of stereopsis? , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision. , 1970, Vision research.

[12]  H. Smallman.  Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  Randolph Blake,et al.  What causes stereoscopic tilt from spatial frequency disparity , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  B. Julesz,et al.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. , 1980, Science.

[16]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[17]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[18]  H. Wilson.  The significance of frequency gradients in binocular grating perception , 1976, Vision Research.