Multiple-criteria decision analysis to substantiate the prospects of industrial and solid municipal wastes as slurry fuel components

This article investigates the recovery of typical wastes (coal slime, sawdust, cardboard and tire pyrolysis residue) as part of high-moisture slurry fuels. Using a laboratory furnace, the ignition and combustion characteristics of fuels as well as NO x and SO x emissions were determined. Using multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and experimental results, we access the performance of four different slurry fuels in comparison with bituminous coal. The novelty of the study is based on the following features: we consider a unique set of parameters of the fuels (economic, environmental, safety and energy indicators), as well as three countries for their potential use (the USA, India and Russia); three different methods for calculating the efficiency indicator of each fuel were used. Despite rather low energy performance, the summarizing efficiency indicator of waste-based slurries was 53–93% higher than that of coal. The use of cardboard in the composition of a fuel blend showed the best complex result (the increase in the efficiency indicator was 80–93% relative to coal). The least promising additive was the pyrolysis residue of automobile tires. Its addition resulted in a 10–15% decrease in overall efficiency relative to a slurry without additives. The research results are useful for optimizing the component composition of waste-based slurries, technical and economic development of projects for the incineration of various wastes in the form of high-moisture fuel slurries.

[1]  P. Strizhak,et al.  Combustion stages of waste-derived blends burned as pellets, layers, and droplets of slurry , 2022, Energy.

[2]  A. Farooq,et al.  Pyrolytic conversion of a novel biomass Ficus natalensis barkcloth: physiochemical and thermo-kinetic analysis , 2021, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.

[3]  M. Miccio,et al.  Fluidized Bed Combustion and Gasification of Fossil and Renewable Slurry Fuels , 2021, Energies.

[4]  Muhammad Aleem Ashraf,et al.  Analysis of mixed cattle manure: Kinetics and thermodynamic comparison of pyrolysis and combustion processes , 2021 .

[5]  G. Kuznetsov,et al.  Composition of a gas and ash mixture formed during the pyrolysis and combustion of coal-water slurries containing petrochemicals. , 2021, Environmental pollution.

[6]  Maria Fatima Ludovico de Almeida,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  A. Nassour,et al.  Refuse-derived fuel potential production for co-combustion in the cement industry in Algeria , 2021, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[8]  M. Demuth,et al.  Experimental investigation and demonstration of pilot-scale combustion of oil-water emulsions and coal-water slurry with pronounced water contents at elevated temperatures with the use of pure oxygen , 2020 .

[9]  Xiaopeng Guo,et al.  The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry——A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods , 2020 .

[10]  C. Achillas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review , 2020 .

[11]  N. Mehta,et al.  Extraction of algae biodiesel for power generation and comparison of sustainable fuels using MCDM , 2020 .

[12]  V. I. Kuprianov,et al.  Effects of (Co-)Combustion Techniques and Operating Conditions on the Performance and NO Emission Reduction in a Biomass-Fueled Twin-Cyclone Fluidized-Bed Combustor , 2020, Waste and Biomass Valorization.

[13]  G. Chen,et al.  Study of the combustion characteristics of sewage sludge pyrolysis oil, heavy fuel oil, and their blends , 2020, Energy.

[14]  Qassim Nasir,et al.  Artificial intelligence applications in solid waste management: A systematic research review. , 2020, Waste management.

[15]  L. Nunes Potential of Coal–Water Slurries as an Alternative Fuel Source during the Transition Period for the Decarbonization of Energy Production: A Review , 2020 .

[16]  Bingbing Mi,et al.  Investigating the co-firing characteristics of bamboo wastes and coal through cone calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , 2019, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[17]  A. Pires,et al.  Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management. , 2019, Waste management.

[18]  Ana Carolina Medina Jimenez,et al.  Three municipal solid waste gasification technologies analysis for electrical energy generation in Brazil , 2019, Waste Management Research.

[19]  Mingming Gao,et al.  The operation control and application of CFB boiler unit with high blending ratio of coal slurry , 2019, Control Engineering Practice.

[20]  Selman Aydin,et al.  The best fuel selection with hybrid multiple-criteria decision making approaches in a CI engine fueled with their blends and pure biodiesels produced from different sources , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[21]  P. Strizhak,et al.  Environmental aspects of converting municipal solid waste into energy as part of composite fuels , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[22]  M. Schuhmacher,et al.  Partial replacement of fossil fuels in a cement plant: Assessment of human health risks by metals, metalloids and PCDD/Fs , 2018, Environmental research.

[23]  Silpa Kaza,et al.  What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050 , 2018 .

[24]  J. R. Perez-Gallardo,et al.  A Multi-objective Framework for Assessment of Recycling Strategies for Photovoltaic Modules based on Life Cycle Assessment , 2018 .

[25]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[26]  Z. Kowalski,et al.  Impact of waste soot on properties of coal-water suspensions , 2016 .

[27]  G. Kuznetsov,et al.  Differences in the ignition characteristics of coal–water slurries and composite liquid fuel , 2016, Solid Fuel Chemistry.

[28]  Zenghui Wang,et al.  A novel suspension-floating-circulating fluidized combustion technology for coal slurry , 2016 .

[29]  Linda S Bäfver,et al.  Fuel design in co-combustion of demolition wood chips and municipal sewage sludge , 2016 .

[30]  M. Gong,et al.  Emission characteristics of PCDD/Fs, PAHs and PCBs during the combustion of sludge-coal water slurry , 2015 .

[31]  E. de Oliveira Fernandes,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods for Renewable Energy Systems on Islands , 2015 .

[32]  Eliseu Monteiro,et al.  Prospective application of municipal solid wastes for energy production in Portugal , 2014 .

[33]  Cen Ke-fa,et al.  Pilot-scale investigation on slurrying, combustion, and slagging characteristics of coal slurry fuel prepared using industrial wasteliquid , 2014 .