PET in lung cancer.

Accurate tumor staging is essential for choosing the appropriate treatment strategy in patients with lung cancer. It has already been shown that FDG-PET is highly accurate in classifying lung nodules as benign or malignant. Integrated PET-CT enables the exact matching of focal abnormalities on PET to anatomic structures on CT. PET-CT is superior in diagnostic accuracy for T staging and differentiation between tumor and peritumoral atelectasis. PET has also proved to be a very effective staging modality for mediastinal nodal staging. It has been demonstrated to assist mediastinoscopy to reveal additional mediastinal disease in 6% of patients. PET detects unexpected extrathoracic metastases in 10-20% of patients and changes therapeutic management in about 20% of patients. A very high accuracy of FDG-PET in distinguishing recurrent disease from benign treatment effects has been shown. Patients should be evaluated after a minimum of 2 months after completion of therapy. FDG-PET can be clinically used for selecting biopsy sites. At our institution PET-CT has become the standard imaging modality for staging patients with lung cancer. Although not all tumors take up FDG, other radiotracers are being studied to expand the utility of PET-CT. PET-CT offers many opportunities for the patients, the clinicians, and the researchers. PET-CT has the potential to become the most efficient oncologic examination in the near future.

[1]  A. Gandjour,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: mediastinal staging in the 1990s--meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[3]  P C Goodman,et al.  Staging non-small cell lung cancer with whole-body PET. , 1999, Radiology.

[4]  R. Coleman,et al.  Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  C. Mountain,et al.  Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. , 1997, Chest.

[6]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. , 1997, Radiology.

[7]  Wang Jun Effectiveness of Positron Emission Tomography in the Preoperative Assessment of Patients with Suspected Non-small-cell Lung Cancer:The PLUS Multicentre Randomized Trial , 2005 .

[8]  Ludwig G. Strauss,et al.  Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  J Bogaert,et al.  Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  E. Gunel,et al.  Probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules using fluorine-18-FDG and PET. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  E. Rendina,et al.  Computed tomography for the evaluation of intrathoracic invasion by lung cancer. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  David J. Yang,et al.  Detecting recurrent or residual lung cancer with FDG-PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Edward F Patz,et al.  The role of imaging in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2002, Seminars in oncology.

[16]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  C. Mountain,et al.  The international system for staging lung cancer. , 2000, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[18]  G. K. von Schulthess,et al.  Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system , 2000, European Radiology.

[19]  H. Steinert,et al.  Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Improves the Management of Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2003 .

[20]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Positron emission tomography with f18-fluorodeoxyglucose in the staging and preoperative evaluation of malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  M. Bamberg,et al.  Metaanalyse zum Stellenwert der Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie mit F-18-Fluorodesoxyglukose (FDG-PET) bei Lungentumoren1 - Diskussionsbasis der deutschen Konsensus-Konferenz Onko-PET 2000 - , 2001 .

[22]  S. Larson,et al.  An initial experience with FDG-PET in the imaging of residual disease after induction therapy for lung cancer. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Detection of extrathoracic metastases by positron emission tomography in lung cancer. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  H. Groen,et al.  Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in patients with lung cancer: detection with PET-CT image fusion -- report of six cases. , 2002, Radiology.

[27]  M. Boers,et al.  Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[28]  M. Graham,et al.  Can FDG-PET reduce the need for mediastinoscopy in potentially resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer? , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  R. Ginsberg,et al.  A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and mediastinoscopy in the preoperative assessment of mediastinal node status in bronchogenic carcinoma. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.