User attributes in Web-based electronic service adoption model (e-sam)

We examine the user attributes of Web-based electronic services. It aims to develop a Web-based electronic service model (e-sam), test its effectiveness, and from it develop an understanding about user interaction with Web sites. In the process constructs are developed to measure user attributes in using Web-based e-services. We report a survey, which captured 403 responses on user attributes towards a specific university Website. We conclude by suggesting a conceptual framework for a Web-based e-service adoption model (e-sam).

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[4]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Predict Website Usage: Extensions and Empirical Tests , 2000 .

[5]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[7]  Michael G. Morris,et al.  Assessing users' subjective quality of experience with the world wide web: an exploratory examination of temporal changes in technology acceptance , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  G. Ellis,et al.  Measurement and Analysis Issues with Explanation of Variance in Daily Experience Using the Flow Model , 1994 .

[9]  David Gefen,et al.  Building users' trust in freeware providers and the effects of this trust on users' perceptions of usefulness, ease of use and intended use of freeware , 1997 .

[10]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[11]  M.H.P. Kleijnen,et al.  Customer adoption of e‐service: an experimental study , 2001 .

[12]  M. Ellis,et al.  Why People Play , 1973 .

[13]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution , 1995 .

[14]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  W ChinWynne,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research , 1995 .

[16]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  E-Service and the Consumer , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[17]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Paul Turner,et al.  Issues in adapting the technology acceptance model (TAM) to investigate non-workplace usage behavior on the world-wide-web , 2001 .

[21]  Mary J. Granger,et al.  Using the Web as a Strategic Resource: An Applied Classroom Exercise , 2001 .

[22]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales , 1993 .

[23]  조병중.  Business on the internet , 2002 .

[24]  J. Webster,et al.  Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1992 .

[25]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[26]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[27]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[28]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[29]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  An examination of the relative importance of four belief constructs on the GSS adoption decision: a comparison of four methods , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  N. Hannon.  The Business of the Internet , 1998 .

[31]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[32]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[34]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality : implications for future research and managerial practice , 2000 .

[35]  Girish H. Subramanian,et al.  A Replication of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Measurement , 1994 .

[36]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[37]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Theophanis C. Stratopoulos,et al.  Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Edward Forrest,et al.  Interactive marketing : the future present , 1996 .

[41]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[42]  Richard F. Bowman.  A "Pac-Man" theory of motivation: Tactical implications for classroom instruction. , 1982 .

[43]  K. Miller,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[44]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  An assessment of structure and causation of IS usage , 1996, DATB.

[45]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[46]  S. Fournier,et al.  Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies , 1998 .

[47]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[48]  John Campbell,et al.  Real options analysis of the timing of IS investment decisions , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[49]  R. Vallerand.  Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .

[50]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  Investments in Information Systems and Financial Performance of the Firm , 1995 .

[51]  Michael Potter,et al.  Adoption of computer aided software engineering (CASE) technology: an innovation adoption perspective , 1995, DATB.

[52]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[54]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[55]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[56]  Jawaid A. Ghani,et al.  The Experience Of Flow In Computer-Mediated And In Face-To-Face Groups , 1991, ICIS.

[57]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[58]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[59]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing The User Interface , 2013 .

[62]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Stephen C. Miller.  Ends, Means, and Galumphing: Some Leitmotifs of Play1 , 1973 .

[64]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[65]  Brian P. Mathews,et al.  The influence of experience on service expectations , 1997 .

[66]  Brian J. Corbitt,et al.  End-User Control In Web-Based Electronic Services: A Case Study , 2003, PACIS.

[67]  R HendricksonAnthony,et al.  An assessment of structure and causation of IS usage , 1996 .

[68]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[69]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[70]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[71]  John D'Ambra,et al.  Emerging factors in user evaluation of the World Wide Web , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[72]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .