A new generation of buses to support more sustainable urban transport policies: A path towards "greener" awareness among bus stakeholders in Europe

EBSF, 3iBS, ZeEUS, EBSF_2 and ELIPTIC are research projects funded by the European Commission, with the aim of developing a new generation of buses across Europe. For all, the common task is two-pronged (i) it is necessary to develop innovative solutions to increase the attractiveness of this mode and (ii) to operate more environmentally-friendly vehicles. Prototypes with more comfortable and accessible internal layouts, advanced ITS-based solutions, new engines designed to save fuel and eco-driving are key working areas. The environmental concern is behind the majority of the tested innovations. These projects are based on demonstrators, that is the innovative measures are tested in real urban environments. The assessment is a classical before-vs-during the implementation of measures comparison. A transferability study is aimed to assess the theoretical exportability of the tested measures across Europe. Results so far stressed contrasting aspects within a common vision for the development of a new generation of buses: although stakeholders are willing to innovate bus fleets by introducing more sustainable propulsion systems, conventional modes are still favoured and the environmental concern is not a driver to export the tested measures. The objectives of the paper are to describe such outcomes, identify reasons which prevent a wider exploitation of cleaner buses, provide possible explanations and suggest recommendations to develop “green” awareness among bus stakeholders.

[1]  Roger Mackett,et al.  Developing new urban public transport systems: An irrational decision-making process , 1996 .

[2]  Julio Lumbreras Martin,et al.  Impact of Spanish electricity mix, over the period 2008–2030, on the Life Cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of Electric, Hybrid Diesel-Electric, Fuel Cell Hybrid and Diesel Bus of the Madrid Transportation System , 2013 .

[3]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[4]  Gabriela Beirão,et al.  Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study , 2007 .

[5]  Michael Cahill,et al.  Transport, Environment and Society , 2010 .

[6]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Assessing social equity in distance based transit fares using a model of travel behavior , 2014 .

[7]  Antti Lajunen,et al.  Energy consumption and cost-benefit analysis of hybrid and electric city buses , 2014 .

[8]  J. Berechman.  Public transit economics and deregulation policy , 1993 .

[9]  Michele Tozzi,et al.  3iBS: the intelligent, innovative integrated bus systems , 2014 .

[10]  Barry Hutton.  Planning Sustainable Transport , 2013 .

[11]  M. Pihlatie,et al.  Fully electric city buses - The viable option , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference (IEVC).

[12]  Peter Mieth,et al.  The TomTom Congestion Index , 2012 .

[13]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Accessibility and the bus system : from concepts to practice , 2002 .

[14]  Maria Vittoria Corazza,et al.  A European vision for more environmentally friendly buses , 2016 .

[15]  Ahmed El-Geneidy,et al.  How can we alter our carbon footprint? Estimating GHG emissions based on travel survey information , 2012 .

[16]  K. Cubukcu.  Examining the cost structure of urban bus transit industry: does urban geography help? ☆ , 2008 .

[17]  A. Musso,et al.  Visioning the Bus System of the Future: Stakeholders’ Perspective , 2015 .

[18]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT COSTS IN THE PRESENCE OF MULTIPLE SERIAL CORRELATION , 1999 .

[19]  Reinhart Kühne,et al.  Electric buses An energy efficient urban transportation means , 2010 .

[20]  Wenwei Ke,et al.  Can propulsion and fuel diversity for the bus fleet achieve the win–win strategy of energy conservation and environmental protection? , 2015 .