Teacher Learning of Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment

This study examined the integration of technology enhanced formative assessment (FA) into teachers’ practice. Participants were high school physics teachers interested in improving their use of a classroom response system (CRS) to promote FA. Data were collected using interviews, direct classroom observations, and collaborative discussions. The physics teachers engaged in collaborative action research (AR) to learn how to use FA and CRS to promote student and teacher learning. Data were analyzed using open coding, cross-case analysis, and content analysis. Results from data analysis allowed researchers to construct a model for knowledge skills necessary for the integration of technology enhanced FA into teachers’ practice. The model is as a set of four technologies: hardware and software; methods for constructing FA items; pedagogical methods; and curriculum integration. The model is grounded in the idea that teachers must develop these respective technologies as they interact with the CRS (i.e., hardware and software, item construction) and their existing practice (i.e., pedagogical methods, curriculum). Implications are that for teachers to make FA an integral part of their practice using CRS, they must: 1) engage in the four technologies; 2) understand the nature of FA; and 3) collaborate with other interested teachers through AR.

[1]  Stephen P. Gordon,et al.  SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach , 2000 .

[2]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[3]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[4]  Jose Mestre.  Hierarchical Problem Solving as a Means of Promoting Expertise. , 1988 .

[5]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Wearing the Letter Jacket: Legitimate Participation in a Collaborative Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Reform Project , 2003 .

[6]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Clandinin, D. Jean, and F. Michael Connelly, "Teachers as Curriculum Makers,' pp. 363-401 in Philip W. Jackson, ed., Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Macmillan, l992. , 1992 .

[7]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The Power of Social Psychological Interventions , 2006, Science.

[8]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[9]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Inside Teaching: How Classroom Life Undermines Reform , 2005 .

[10]  Melvin S. Steinberg,et al.  Using models to teach electricity—The CASTLE project , 1993 .

[11]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[12]  L. Vygotsky.  Thinking and Speech , 1987 .

[13]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education. , 2001 .

[14]  William Morris.  The American Heritage dictionary of the English language , 1969 .

[15]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[16]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[17]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[18]  Michele Jacobsen,et al.  New Ways of Preparing Teachers for Technology Integration. , 2002 .

[19]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[20]  David A. Banks,et al.  Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases. , 2006 .

[21]  J. H. Driel,et al.  Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 1998 .

[22]  A. Feldman.  The Role of Conversation in Collaborative Action Research , 1999 .

[23]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Action Research in Science Education. ERIC Digest. , 2000 .

[24]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[25]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[26]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning , 1996, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[27]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al.  Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[28]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration , 1999 .

[29]  John J. Clement,et al.  Preconceptions in mechanics : lessons dealing with student' conceptual difficuties , 1994 .

[30]  P. Black,et al.  Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. , 2001 .

[31]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  QUESTION DRIVEN INSTRUCTION: TEACHING SCIENCE (WELL) WITH AN AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM , 2005 .

[32]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Science teachers' attempts at integrating feminist pedagogy through collaborative action research , 2007 .

[33]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[34]  M. Alexander,et al.  Professional development. , 1999, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[35]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Existential approaches to action research , 2002 .

[36]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Promoting quality for teacher action research: lessons learned from science teachers’ action research , 2006 .

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[38]  Ian D. Beatty,et al.  Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching , 2005, physics/0508114.

[39]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research , 1996 .

[40]  P. Black,et al.  Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom , 2004 .

[41]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Promoting equitable collaboration between university researchers and school teachers , 1993 .

[42]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[43]  J. H. McMillan.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research , 2001 .

[44]  Andrew Zucker,et al.  Effective Teacher Professional Development in the Uses of Technology. , 2000 .

[45]  J. Minstrell,et al.  Action Research as a Research Methodology for the Study of the Teaching and Learning of Science. , 2000 .

[46]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Decision Making in the Practical Domain: A Model of Practical Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[47]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Promoting skilled problem‐solving behavior among beginning physics students , 1993 .

[48]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  Keeping learning on track: classroom assessment and the regulation of learning , 2007 .

[49]  J. Wertsch.  Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[50]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[51]  Milton Schwebel,et al.  Review of Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. , 1979 .

[52]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Ethnography: Step-by-Step , 1989 .

[53]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Erzberger's dilemma: Validity in action research and science teachers' need to know , 1994 .

[54]  P. Black,et al.  Learning How to Learn, in Classrooms, Schools and Networks: aims, design and analysis , 2006 .

[55]  J. Bransford.  How people learn , 2000 .

[56]  Sandra Hollingsworth,et al.  Teacher Research and Urban Literacy Education: Lessons and Conversations in a Feminist Key , 1994 .