Feed-forward DC-bus control loop applied to a single-phase grid-connected PV system operating with PSO-based MPPT technique and active power-line conditioning

This study deals with a double-stage single-phase grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) system operating with an additional feed-forward control loop (FFCL). Owing to the PV array being constantly subjected to abrupt solar irradiance change, the DC-bus voltage varies and can interfere in adequate PV system operation. Therefore, an FFCL is proposed to improve the DC-bus voltage dynamic response, and reduce the settling time and overshoot. The FFCL acts on the generation of the inverter current reference, such that the dynamic behaviour of the current injected into the grid is also improved. Furthermore, the PV system performance is affected by problems associated with mismatching phenomena such as partial shading. This problem can be overcome using the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique based on particle swarm optimisation (PSO). The PSO-based MPPT is compared with the conventional perturb-and-observe MPPT technique, in order to highlight its effectiveness. In this study, the PV system also performs active power-line conditioning. Thereby, whereas the step-up DC-DC converter carries out the MPPT, the proper inverter current reference is computed to inject active power into the grid, as well as perform power-line conditioning. The performance and effectiveness of the PV system are evaluated through extensive experimental tests.

[1]  Carlos A. Canesin,et al.  Three-phase tri-state buck–boost integrated inverter for solar applications , 2015 .

[2]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[3]  Grazia Todeschini,et al.  Wind energy conversion systems as active filters: Design and comparison of three control methods , 2010 .

[4]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)–Based MPPT for PV With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[5]  Yi-Hwa Liu,et al.  A Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Peter Bracinik,et al.  Comparison between the particle swarm optimisation and differential evolution approaches for the optimal proportional–integral controllers design during photovoltaic power plants modelling , 2016 .

[7]  Masafumi Miyatake,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking of Multiple Photovoltaic Arrays: A PSO Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Massimo Vitelli,et al.  A Technique for Improving P&O MPPT Performances of Double-Stage Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Proportional–integral/proportional–integral-derivative tuning procedure of a single-phase shunt active power filter using Bode diagram , 2014 .

[10]  Shoji Fukuda,et al.  A novel current-tracking method for active filters based on a sinusoidal internal model [for PWM inv , 2001 .

[11]  Tsai-Fu Wu,et al.  A single-phase inverter system for PV power injection and active power filtering with nonlinear inductor consideration , 2005 .

[12]  S. Fukuda,et al.  A novel current tracking method for active filters based on a sinusoidal internal model , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[13]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  A Deterministic Particle Swarm Optimization Maximum Power Point Tracker for Photovoltaic System Under Partial Shading Condition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Rajiv K. Varma,et al.  Generalised model of a photovoltaic panel , 2014 .

[15]  Bruno A. Angelico,et al.  Stability analysis and performance evaluation of a single-phase phase-locked loop algorithm using a non-autonomous adaptive filter , 2014 .

[16]  Luigi Piegari,et al.  Adaptive perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking , 2010 .

[17]  Amitava Chatterjee,et al.  Nonlinear inertia weight variation for dynamic adaptation in particle swarm optimization , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[18]  Jean-Philippe Martin,et al.  A PSO-Based Global MPPT Technique for Distributed PV Power Generation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Carlos A. Canesin,et al.  Evaluation of the Main MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Kinattingal Sundareswaran,et al.  Development of a hybrid genetic algorithm/perturb and observe algorithm for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems under non-uniform insolation , 2015 .

[21]  Leonardo Bruno Garcia Campanhol,et al.  Grid-tied photovoltaic system based on PSO MPPT technique with active power line conditioning , 2016 .

[22]  Kinattingal Sundareswaran,et al.  Application of random search method for maximum power point tracking in partially shaded photovoltaic systems , 2014 .

[23]  Vivek Nandan Lal,et al.  Modified particle swarm optimisation-based maximum power point tracking controller for single-stage utility-scale photovoltaic system with reactive power injection capability , 2016 .

[24]  Mohammad Hassan Moradi,et al.  A Function-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Photovoltaic Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[25]  F. Blaabjerg,et al.  A review of single-phase grid-connected inverters for photovoltaic modules , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.