Acquiring and adapting probabilistic models of agent conversation

Communication in multiagent systems (MASs) is usually governed by agent communication languages (ACLs) and communication protocols carrying a clear cut semantics. With an increasing degree of openness, however, the need arises for more flexible models of communication that can handle the uncertainty associated with the fact that adherence to a supposedly agreed specification of possible conversations cannot be ensured on the side of other agents.As one example for such a model, interaction frames follow an empirical semantics view of communication, where meaning is defined in terms of expected consequences, and allow for a combination of existing expectations with empirical observation of how communication is used in practice.In this paper, we use methods from the fields of case-based reasoning, inductive logic programming and cluster analysis to devise a formal scheme for the acquisition and adaptation of interaction frames from actual conversations, enabling agents to autonomously (i.e. independent of users and system designers) create and maintain a concise model of the different classes of conversation in a MAS on the basis of an initial set of ACL and protocol specifications. This resembles the first rigorous attempt to solve this problem that is decisive for building truly autonomous agents.

[1]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Interaction is meaning: a new model for communication in open systems , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[2]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Agents and Computational Autonomy , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Agents And Computational Autonomy: Potential, Risks, And Solutions (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) , 2004 .

[4]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Communicative Actions for Artificial Agents , 1997, ICMAS.

[5]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Empirical-rational semantics of agent communication , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[6]  Maurice Bruynooghe,et al.  A polynomial time computable metric between point sets , 2001, Acta Informatica.

[7]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  Reasoning About Communication - A Practical Approach Based on Empirical Semantics , 2004, CIA.

[8]  Michèle Sebag,et al.  Distance Induction in First Order Logic , 1997, ILP.

[9]  J. Dopp J. L. Austin, How to do things with words , 1962 .

[10]  Gerhard Weiß,et al.  Social Annotation of Semantically Heterogeneous Knowledge , 2004, SemAnnot@ISWC.

[11]  Munindar P. Singh A semantics for speech acts , 1997, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[12]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  An approach to the analysis and design of multiagent systems based on interaction frames , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[13]  Munindar P. Singh A Social Semantics for Agent Communication Languages , 2000, Issues in Agent Communication.

[14]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  An empirical semantics approach to reasoning about communication , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[15]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Operational specification of a commitment-based agent communication language , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[16]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Communicating Agents , 2004 .

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[18]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  Hierarchical reinforcement learning in communication-mediated multiagent coordination , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..