How insects sense olfactory patches : the spatial scaling of olfactory information

When searching for resources in heterogeneous environments, animals must rely on their abilities to detect the resources via their sensory systems. However, variation in the strength of the sensory cue may be mediated by the physical size of the resource patch. Patch detection of insects are often predicted by the scaling of sensory cues to patch size, where visual cues has been proposed to scale proportional to the diameter of the patch. The scaling properties of olfactory cues are, however, virtually unknown. Here, we investigated scaling rules for olfactory information in a gradient of numbers of odour sources, relevant to odour-mediated attraction under field conditions. We recorded moth antennal responses to sex pheromones downwind from pheromone patches and estimated the slope in the scaling relationship between the effective length of the odour plumes and the number of odour sources. These measurements showed that the effective plume length increased proportional to the square root of the number of odour sources. The scaling relationship, as estimated in the field experiment, was then evaluated against field data of the slope in the relationship between trap catch and release rate of chemical attractants for a wide range of insects. This meta-analysis revealed an average slope largely consistent with the estimated scaling relationship between the effective plume length and the number of odour sources. This study is the first to estimate the scaling properties of olfactory cues empirically and has implications for understanding and predicting the spatial distributions of insects searching by means of olfactory cues in heterogeneous environments.

[1]  O. Sutton,et al.  Micrometeorology: A Study of Physical Processes in the Lowest Layers of the Earth's Atmosphere , 1953 .

[2]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Predicting the optimal prey group size from predator hunting behaviour. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[3]  W. Kunin Patterns of herbivore incidence on experimental arrays and field populations of ragwort, Senecio jacobaea , 1999 .

[4]  N. Vickers Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[5]  A. Ludlow,et al.  Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field , 1983, Nature.

[6]  B. Hansson,et al.  Olfaction in Lepidoptera , 1995, Experientia.

[7]  E. A. Arbas,et al.  Odor-modulated upwind flight of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta L. , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  R. Cardé,et al.  Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor , 2008, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[9]  L. Hemerik,et al.  Chemical communication: does odor plume shape matter? , 2007 .

[10]  John Murtis,et al.  Odor Plumes and How Insects Use Them , 1992 .

[11]  C. Ammann,et al.  Dispersion of carbon dioxide plumes in African woodland: implications for host‐finding by tsetse flies , 2004 .

[12]  J. Farrell,et al.  Filament-Based Atmospheric Dispersion Model to Achieve Short Time-Scale Structure of Odor Plumes , 2002 .

[13]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Shared signals -'alarm calls' from plants increase apparency to herbivores and their enemies in nature. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[14]  C. Ioannou,et al.  Unified effects of aggregation reveal larger prey groups take longer to find , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  W H Bossert,et al.  The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. , 1963, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Electroantennogram responses of tsetse flies (Glossina pallidipes) to host odours in an open field and riverine woodland , 1998 .

[17]  R. Prokopy,et al.  Visual Detection of Plants by Herbivorous Insects , 1983 .

[18]  G. Englund,et al.  Scale dependence of immigration rates: models, metrics and data. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  Marcel Dicke,et al.  Pheromone-mediated aggregation in nonsocial arthropods: an evolutionary ecological perspective. , 2005, Annual review of entomology.

[20]  J. Settele,et al.  Do all inter-patch movements represent dispersal? A mixed kernel study of butterfly mobility in fragmented landscapes. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[21]  A M Reynolds,et al.  Appetitive flight patterns of male Agrotis segetum moths over landscape scales. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  James R. Miller,et al.  Finding and Accepting Host Plants , 1984 .

[23]  R. Cardé,et al.  Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests , 2000 .

[24]  John Murlis,et al.  Measurement of Odor-Plume Structure in a Wind Tunnel Using a Photoionization Detector and a Tracer Gas , 2002 .

[25]  A. S. French,et al.  Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M J Weissburg,et al.  The fluid dynamical context of chemosensory behavior. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[27]  Yann Clough,et al.  The role of pre- and post- alighting detection mechanisms in the responses to patch size by specialist herbivores , 2005 .

[28]  R. D. Girling,et al.  Observations on the flight paths of the day-flying moth Virbia lamae during periods of mate location: do males have a strategy for contacting the pheromone plume? , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.