Tool point dynamics prediction by a three-component model utilizing distributed joint interfaces

In machine dynamics the tool point frequency response functions (FRFs) are employed to predict the stable machining conditions. In this paper, a combined analytical–experimental substructuring procedure is proposed to determine the tool point FRFs for different holder–tool configurations. The method employs the measured spindle-machine FRFs and analytical models of the tool and the holder to predict the tool tip FRFs for different sets of tools and holders mounted on the machine spindle without the need for repeated experimental measurements. Distributed joint interfaces are used to couple the three-component model of the machine. The machine tool tip FRFs with different tool–holder combinations are obtained assuming the clamping conditions at joint interfaces remain unchanged. An experimental case study is provided to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method in dynamic modeling of machine tool.

[1]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  An investigation of the dynamic absorber effect in high-speed machining , 2005 .

[2]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Chatter Stability in Milling—Part I: General Formulation , 1998 .

[3]  Hamid Ahmadian,et al.  Continuous model for analytical prediction of chatter in milling , 2009 .

[4]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Tool Point Frequency Response Prediction for High-Speed Machining by RCSA , 2001 .

[5]  Hamid Ahmadian,et al.  Modelling machine tool dynamics using a distributed parameter tool–holder joint interface , 2007 .

[6]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Three-Component Receptance Coupling Substructure Analysis for Tool Point Dynamics Prediction , 2005 .

[7]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Analytical models for high performance milling. Part I: Cutting forces, structural deformations and tolerance integrity , 2006 .

[8]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Receptance coupling for end mills , 2003 .

[9]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Analytical modeling of spindle-tool dynamics on machine tools using Timoshenko beam model and receptance coupling for the prediction of tool point FRF , 2006 .

[10]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Modeling and identification of tool holder–spindle interface dynamics , 2007 .

[11]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Analytical models for high performance milling. Part II: Process dynamics and stability , 2006 .

[12]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  An improved tool–holder model for RCSA tool-point frequency response prediction , 2009 .

[13]  Mohammad R. Movahhedy,et al.  Prediction of spindle dynamics in milling by sub-structure coupling , 2006 .

[14]  A. Ferri,et al.  Damping and Vibration of Beams With Various Types of Frictional Support Conditions , 1989 .

[15]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Predicting High-Speed Machining Dynamics by Substructure Analysis , 2000 .

[16]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Chatter Stability in Milling—Part II: Application of the General Formulation to Common Milling Systems , 1998 .

[17]  Evren Burcu Kivanc,et al.  Structural modeling of end mills for form error and stability analysis , 2004 .