Intercomparisons of cloud-top and cloud-base heights from ground-based Lidar, CloudSat and CALIPSO measurements

This study presents results of the intercomparison of cloud-top height (CTH) and cloud-bottom height (CBH) obtained from a space-borne active sensor Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR), the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), the space-borne passive sensor Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and ground-based Lidar measurements. Three selected cases (one daytime and two night-time cases) involving various cloud conditions such as semi-transparent thin cirrus, opaque thick tropospheric clouds and multi-layered clouds are studied, with special attention to CBH. The space-based CALIOP provides reliable heights of thin high-altitude cirrus clouds containing small ice particles, but the 94 GHz CPR has low sensitivity to these clouds. The CTHs retrieved from the CPR and CALIOP for thick tropospheric clouds are in good agreement with each other. Discrepancies between the CPR and the CALIOP values of the CBH for thick opaque clouds arise from strong Lidar signal attenuations. In cloud-overlap conditions (i.e. multi-layered clouds are present), the CALIOP has difficulties in determining the cloud vertical structure (CVS) for thick clouds underlying thin cirrus clouds due to signal attenuations, whereas the CPR detects the CTH and CBH of both the cloud layers. This fact is also confirmed by the comparison of seasonal variations of occurrences of CBH and CTH retrieved from 1 year measurements. The CBHs derived from the CPR and ground-based Lidar are generally in good agreement with each other. Especially, comparison of CBH between the ground-based Lidar and CPR retrieved from June 2006 to October 2008 shows an excellent linear relationship (coefficient of determination, R 2 ∼ 0.996).

[1]  A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Semianalytical cloud retrieval algorithm as applied to the cloud top altitude and the cloud geometrical thickness determination from top‐of‐atmosphere reflectance measurements in the oxygen A band , 2004 .

[2]  John P. Burrows,et al.  Intercomparison of cloud top altitudes as derived using GOME and ATSR-2 instruments onboard ERS-2 , 2006 .

[3]  Moustafa T. Chahine,et al.  Cloud type comparisons of AIRS, CloudSat, and CALIPSO cloud height and amount , 2007 .

[4]  Soon-Chang Yoon,et al.  Ground-based remote sensing measurements of aerosol and ozone in an urban area: A case study of mixing height evolution and its effect on ground-level ozone concentrations , 2007 .

[5]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  Evaluation of radar multiple scattering effects in Cloudsat configuration , 2006 .

[6]  R. Hogan,et al.  Characteristics of mixed‐phase clouds. I: Lidar, radar and aircraft observations from CLARE'98 , 2003 .

[7]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Effects of Cloud Vertical Structure on Atmospheric Circulation in the GISS GCM , 1998 .

[8]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Cloud Type and Macrophysical Property Retrieval Using Multiple Remote Sensors , 2001 .

[9]  David M. Winker,et al.  Coordination of quid pro quo ground-based measurements of cloud and aerosol optical properties for validation of the CALIPSO mission , 2005, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[10]  T. Kovacs.  Comparing MODIS and AERONET aerosol optical depth at varying separation distances to assess ground‐based validation strategies for spaceborne lidar , 2006 .

[11]  P. Webster,et al.  Tropical Upper-Tropospheric Extended Clouds: Inferences from Winter MONEX , 1980 .

[12]  J. Comstock,et al.  Ground‐based lidar and radar remote sensing of tropical cirrus clouds at Nauru Island: Cloud statistics and radiative impacts , 2002 .

[13]  Soon-Chang Yoon,et al.  Validation of aerosol and cloud layer structures from the space-borne lidar CALIOP using a ground-based lidar in Seoul, Korea , 2008 .

[14]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  MODIS Global Cloud-Top Pressure and Amount Estimation: Algorithm Description and Results , 2008 .

[15]  Charmien Johnson Msfc.  Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations , 2013 .

[16]  Guangyu Zhao,et al.  Cloud top height comparisons from ASTER, MISR, and MODIS for trade wind cumuli , 2007 .

[17]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Daytime Multilayered Cloud Detection Using Multispectral Imager Data , 2004 .

[18]  J. Muller,et al.  On the use of ICESAT‐GLAS measurements for MODIS and SEVIRI cloud‐top height accuracy assessment , 2005 .

[19]  K. Sassen.  The Polarization Lidar Technique for Cloud Research: A Review and Current Assessment , 1991 .

[20]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  S. Ackerman,et al.  A Comparison of GOES Sounder– and Cloud Lidar- and Radar-Retrieved Cloud-Top Heights , 2005 .

[22]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Objective Determination of Cloud Heights and Radar Reflectivities Using a Combination of Active Remote Sensors at the ARM CART Sites , 2000 .

[23]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1989, Science.

[24]  W. Menzel,et al.  Eight Years of High Cloud Statistics Using HIRS , 1999 .

[25]  W. Menzel,et al.  Comparison of AIRS, MODIS, CloudSat and CALIPSO cloud top height retrievals , 2007 .

[26]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Nighttime Multilayered Cloud Detection Using MODIS and ARM Data , 2003 .

[27]  David M. Winker,et al.  Status and performance of the CALIOP lidar , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[28]  David M. Winker,et al.  Use of probability distribution functions for discriminating between cloud and aerosol in lidar backscatter data , 2004 .

[29]  Thomas P. Ackerman,et al.  An assessment of Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) stereo‐derived cloud top heights and cloud top winds using ground‐based radar, lidar, and microwave radiometers , 2007 .

[30]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[31]  Gerald G. Mace,et al.  Global hydrometeor occurrence as observed by CloudSat: Initial observations from summer 2006 , 2007 .

[32]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  Continuous observations of Asian dust and other aerosols by polarization lidars in China and Japan during ACE-Asia , 2004 .

[33]  M. Shupe,et al.  An annual cycle of Arctic cloud characteristics observed by radar and lidar at SHEBA , 2002 .

[34]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  A comparison of cloud top heights computed from airborne lidar and MAS radiance data using CO2 slicing , 1999 .

[35]  Sang Woo Kim,et al.  Ground-Based Mie-Scattering Lidar Measurements of Aerosol Extinction Profiles during ABC-EAREX 2005: Comparisons of Instruments and Inversion Algorithms , 2008 .

[36]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Comparison of MISR and MODIS cloud-top heights in the presence of cloud overlap , 2007 .

[37]  J. Comstock,et al.  Comparison of cloud-top height retrievals from ground-based 35 GHz MMCR and GMS-5 satellite observations at ARM TWP Manus site , 2004 .

[38]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  NETWORK OBSERVATIONS OF ASIAN DUST AND AIR POLLUTION AEROSOLS USING TWO-WAVELENGTH POLARIZATION LIDARS , 2006 .

[39]  Jan-Peter Muller,et al.  Intercomparison of multiple years of MODIS, MISR and radar cloud-top heights , 2005 .

[40]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Cirrus cloud retrieval using infrared sounding data : multilevel cloud errors , 1994 .

[41]  Jan-Peter Muller,et al.  Comparison of cloud top heights derived from MISR stereo and MODIS CO2‐slicing , 2002 .

[42]  Chialin Wu,et al.  Cloud profiling radar for the CloudSat mission , 2005, IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005..

[43]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[44]  Annmarie Eldering,et al.  Toward the characterization of upper tropospheric clouds using Atmospheric Infrared Sounder and Microwave Limb Sounder observations , 2007 .