A Study of Divergent TA Teaching Styles in Inquiry Based Laboratory Education

This dissertation is a study of the divergent behaviors evidenced by different TAs teaching inquiry based physics laboratories with minimal preparation on how to use techniques such as Socratic dialogue, wait time, and time management. The revised physics laboratory curricula, a four semester laboratory sequence, were studied over the course of two years and one of the laboratory manuals was rewritten and new techniques of TA training developed in order to align TA behavior with the ideals of inquiry based education. This revision was only partially successful, aiding TAs dramatically in improving their time management skills and use of their time, however not yielding dramatic improvements in their use of Socratic dialogue or leading questions.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture , 2002 .

[3]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[4]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  A Reassessment of the Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Curricula of the 60's on Student Performance. , 1990 .

[5]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[6]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[7]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[8]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Psychology of the Child , 1969 .

[9]  Morris L. Bigge.  Learning theories for teachers , 1964 .

[10]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[11]  Douglas Huffman,et al.  What does the force concept inventory actually measure , 1995 .

[12]  Daniel S. Domin,et al.  A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles , 1999 .

[13]  D. Hodson,et al.  From Constructivism To Social Constructivism: A Vygotskian Perspective on Teaching and Learning Science. , 1998 .

[14]  John W. Renner,et al.  Are Colleges Concerned with Intellectual Development , 1971 .

[15]  F. Reif,et al.  Teaching physicists’ thinking skills in the laboratory , 1979 .

[16]  Christopher A. Moore,et al.  Wait-time in college classes taken by education majors , 1992 .

[17]  Molly H. Weinburgh,et al.  Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta‐analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991 , 1995 .

[18]  Beth Thacker,et al.  Comparing problem solving performance of physics students in inquiry‐based and traditional introductory physics courses , 1994 .

[19]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[20]  Training Graduate Teaching Assistants To Be Better Undergraduate Physics Educators. , 1994 .

[21]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[22]  H. Kruglak.  Achievement of Physics Students With and Without Laboratory Work , 1953 .

[23]  Michael P. Freedman.  Relationship among Laboratory Instruction, Attitude toward Science, and Achievement in Science Knowledge. , 1997 .

[24]  J. Piaget.  The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[25]  Tom Schram,et al.  Conceptualizing and Proposing Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[26]  R. Lock.  Gender and practical skill performance in science , 1992 .

[27]  Michael P. Freedman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF LABORATORY INSTRUCTION ON SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENT AND ATTITUDE TOWARD SCIENCE ACROSS GENDER DIFFERENCES , 2002 .

[28]  S. Brown.  Do College Students Benefit from High School Laboratory Courses , 1958 .

[29]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving , 1992 .

[30]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[31]  Sidney Rosen,et al.  A History of the Physics Laboratory in the American Public High School (to 1910) , 1954 .

[32]  P. Sutherland,et al.  Cognitive Development Today: Piaget and his Critics , 1992 .

[33]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. Bibliography. 3rd Edition. IPN Reports-in-Brief = Alltagsvorstellungen und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht. Bibliographie. 3. Auflage. IPN-Kurzberichte. , 1991 .

[34]  Carol Lerch.  The Unfossilization of Concepts in Adult Learning. , 2002 .

[35]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Teaching Introductory Physics , 1996 .

[36]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[37]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The effect of an extended teacher wait‐time on science achievement , 1980 .

[38]  Richard N. Steinberg,et al.  Performance on multiple-choice diagnostics and complementary exam problems , 1997 .

[39]  The influence of physics laboratories on student performance in a lecture course , 1986 .

[40]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .

[41]  Charles Henderson,et al.  Common Concerns About the Force Concept Inventory , 2002 .

[42]  Richard R. Hake,et al.  Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory , 1992 .

[43]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Everyday Cognition: Development in Social Context , 1999 .

[44]  Melba Phillips.  Early history of physics laboratories for students at the college level , 1981 .

[45]  S. Carey.  Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[46]  Mary Budd Rowe,et al.  Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be A Way of Speeding Up! , 1986 .

[47]  Margaret B Row.  Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables, Their Influence on Language, Logic, and Fate Control: Part One--Wait-Time. , 1974 .

[48]  O. Duell.  Extended Wait Time and University Student Achievement , 1994 .

[49]  Jeffrey A. Phillips,et al.  Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability , 2005 .

[50]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Development of energy concepts in introductory physics courses , 1999 .

[51]  Abigail M. Harris,et al.  Gender differences in national assessment of educational progress science items: What does i don't know really mean? , 1987 .

[52]  W. Toothacker,et al.  A critical look at introductory laboratory instruction , 1983 .

[53]  E. L. Jossem.  Resource Letter EPGA-1: The Education of Physics Graduate Assistants. , 2000 .