A common representation for semantic and physical properties: a cognitive-anatomical approach.

This is the first report of a mutual interference between luminance and numerical value in magnitude judgments. Instead of manipulating the physical size of compared numbers, which is the traditional approach in size congruity studies, luminance levels were manipulated. The results yielded the classical congruity effect. Participants took more time to process numerically larger numbers when they were brighter than when they were darker, and more time to process a darker number when its numerical value was smaller than when it was larger. On the basis of neurophysiological studies of magnitude comparison and interference between semantic and physical information, it is proposed that the processing of semantic and physical magnitude information is carried out by a shared brain structure. It is suggested that this brain area, the left intraparietal sulcus, subserves various comparison processes by representing various quantities on an amodal magnitude scale.

[1]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  The Quantitative Nature of a Visual Task Differentiates between Ventral and Dorsal Stream , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  W. Fias,et al.  Semantic Influences on Feature-Based Attention Due to Overlap of Neural Circuits , 2002, Cortex.

[4]  A. Nieder.  Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[6]  A. Paivio.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  H. Heinze,et al.  On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: a behavioral and event-related potential study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[10]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of colour vision , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Algom,et al.  Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. , 1999 .

[13]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[14]  Derek Besner,et al.  Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[16]  L Girelli,et al.  The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Is Word Recognition Automatic? A Cognitive-Anatomical Approach , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[20]  Anja Ischebeck,et al.  On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Retinotopy and color sensitivity in human visual cortical area V8 , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Is an ant larger than a lion? , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[27]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[28]  G. Logan,et al.  Magnitude versus parity in numerical judgements: event-related brain potentials implicate response conflict as the source of interference. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[29]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  W Fias,et al.  Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.