Revised Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for Assessment of Response in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Version 1.1)

Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma poses unique difficulties in tumor measurement and response assessment; however, robust and reproducible assessment of response is critically important in the conduct, interpretation, and reporting of clinical trials. Methods: The current de facto standard for the assessment of mesothelioma tumor response, “modified RECIST” (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), was published in 2004 as a research paper. Practical application of the modified RECIST guidelines has suffered from varied interpretations, resulting in inaccuracies and inconsistencies in tumor response assessment across and within mesothelioma clinical trials. The presented “modified RECIST 1.1 for mesothelioma” response assessment guidelines provide a much‐needed update that incorporates recommendations from RECIST 1.1 and approaches to other practical issues, including: (1) definition of minimally measurable disease; (2) definition of measurable lesions; (3) acceptable measurement location; (4) non‐pleural disease considerations; (5) characterization of non‐measurable pleural disease; (6) assessment of pathological lymph nodes; (7) establishing progressive disease; and (8) accommodations for bilateral pleural disease. Results: These modified RECIST 1.1 guidelines for mesothelioma tumor response collate and apply research published since the development of modified RECIST, align modified RECIST with RECIST 1.1, address those aspects of tumor measurement that were neglected or not well characterized in the modified RECIST paper, and clarify ambiguous or difficult measurement issues that have been highlighted through the subsequent decade of clinical trials research. Conclusion: Adoption of the modified RECIST 1.1 guidelines for mesothelioma is recommended to harmonize the application of tumor measurement and response assessment across the next generation of clinical trials in this disease.

[1]  Heber MacMahon,et al.  Variability in mesothelioma tumor response classification. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  A. Musk,et al.  Cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment for malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Heber MacMahon,et al.  Measurement of mesothelioma on thoracic CT scans: a comparison of manual and computer-assisted techniques. , 2004, Medical physics.

[4]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Assessment of Therapy Responses and Prediction of Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Through Computer-Aided Volumetric Measurement on Computed Tomography Scans , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  Samuel G Armato,et al.  Automated matching of temporally sequential CT sections. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Preoperative tumor volume is associated with outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  M. Millward,et al.  A Novel Prognostic Model for Malignant Mesothelioma Incorporating Quantitative FDG-PET Imaging with Clinical Parameters , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  J Bogaerts,et al.  Evaluation of lymph nodes with RECIST 1.1. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Samuel G Armato,et al.  Characterization of mesothelioma and tissues present in contrast-enhanced thoracic CT scans. , 2011, Medical physics.

[10]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 minutes. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  D. Fielding,et al.  A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Ping Li,et al.  Radiologic-pathologic correlation of mesothelioma tumor volume. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[13]  Heber MacMahon,et al.  Evaluation of semiautomated measurements of mesothelioma tumor thickness on CT scans. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[14]  Arturo Chiti,et al.  Early Response Evaluation in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma by Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose , 2006 .

[15]  A. Satterfield,et al.  TREATMENT , 1924, California and western medicine.

[16]  K. Nackaerts,et al.  Tremelimumab as second-line or third-line treatment in relapsed malignant mesothelioma (DETERMINE): a multicentre, international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  V. Rusch,et al.  The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[18]  Olivier Molinier,et al.  Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed pleural mesothelioma in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[19]  S. Armato,et al.  Optimization of Response Classification Criteria for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[20]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.

[21]  Shin Matsuoka,et al.  Epithelial malignant pleural mesothelioma after extrapleural pneumonectomy: stratification of survival with CT-derived tumor volume. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  Robert C. Rintoul,et al.  The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for Revisions of the T Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Pleural Mesothelioma , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[24]  H. Steinert,et al.  Combined FDG-PET/CT in response evaluation of malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2010, Lung cancer.

[25]  Samuel G Armato,et al.  Lung Volume Measurements as a Surrogate Marker for Patient Response in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[26]  E. Scarpi,et al.  FDG PET/CT Response Evaluation in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Treated with Talc Pleurodesis and Chemotherapy , 2012, Journal of Cancer.

[27]  M. Maio,et al.  Efficacy and safety of an intensified schedule of tremelimumab for chemotherapy-resistant malignant mesothelioma: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[28]  T E Walsh,et al.  Reporting results. , 1969, Archives of otolaryngology.

[29]  Robert Ford,et al.  iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[30]  Samuel G Armato,et al.  Observer Variability in Mesothelioma Tumor Thickness Measurements: Defining Minimally Measurable Lesions , 2014, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[31]  A. Hope,et al.  Impact of tumour thickness on survival after radical radiation and surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2017, European Respiratory Journal.

[32]  S. Armato,et al.  Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 12th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[33]  Samuel G. Armato,et al.  North American Multicenter Volumetric CT Study for Clinical Staging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Feasibility and Logistics of Setting Up a Quantitative Imaging Study , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[34]  A. Fischman,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and CT after talc pleurodesis. , 2004, Chest.

[35]  M. Byrne,et al.  Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  Erich P Huang,et al.  Metrology Standards for Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers. , 2015, Radiology.

[37]  A. Santoro,et al.  Clinical safety and activity of pembrolizumab in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (KEYNOTE-028): preliminary results from a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[38]  Roslyn J. Francis,et al.  Early Prediction of Response to Chemotherapy and Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Using a Novel Semiautomated 3-Dimensional Volume-Based Analysis of Serial 18F-FDG PET Scans , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  Samuel G Armato,et al.  Modeling of mesothelioma growth demonstrates weaknesses of current response criteria. , 2006, Lung cancer.

[40]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[41]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Cancer clinical trial outcomes: any progress in tumour-size assessment? , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[42]  M. Maio,et al.  Tremelimumab for patients with chemotherapy-resistant advanced malignant mesothelioma: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  S. Armato,et al.  Disease volumes as a marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.