Closed suction drainage has no benefits in revision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

[1]  C. Konrads,et al.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  T. Muneta,et al.  Is closed suction drainage effective in early recovery of hip joint function? Comparative evaluation in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Risk factors for surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  F. Haddad,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the topical administration of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee replacement. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  D. Mayman,et al.  The increased total cost associated with post-operative drains in total hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[7]  E. Gómez-Barrena,et al.  Blood transfusion after primary total knee arthroplasty can be significantly minimised through a multimodal blood-loss prevention approach , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[8]  Li-Dong Wu,et al.  Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  H. Kazi,et al.  The Effect of Bolus Administration of Tranexamic Acid in Revision Hip Arthroplasty , 2012, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[10]  P. von Roth,et al.  Use of Redon drains in primary total hip arthroplasty has no clinically relevant benefits. , 2012, Orthopedics.

[11]  F. Haddad,et al.  SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF TRANEXAMIC ACID IN TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS , 2012 .

[12]  C. Dora,et al.  Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach , 2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[13]  F. Haddad,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  J. Kuiper,et al.  No drain, autologous transfusion drain or suction drain? A randomised prospective study in total hip replacement surgery of 168 patients. , 2010, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[15]  S. K. Fokter,et al.  Comparison of drainage techniques on prolonged serous drainage after total hip arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  D. Backstein,et al.  The long modified extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[17]  T. Matsushita,et al.  Drainage Does Not Increase Anemia after Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  C. Dora,et al.  Simplified wound care and earlier wound recovery without closed suction drainage in elective total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized trial in 100 operations , 2007, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[19]  M. Engquist,et al.  Blood loss after total hip replacement: a prospective randomized study between wound compression and drainage. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  I. Brenkel,et al.  A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  M. Parker,et al.  Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  M. Buttaro,et al.  No need for routine closed suction drainage in elective arthroplasty of the hipA prospective randomized trial in 104 operations , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  A. Meta-analysis.  Closed Suction Drainage for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty , 2004 .

[24]  C N A Esler,et al.  The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  H. Jacobsson,et al.  No effect of drains on the postoperative hematoma volume in hip replacement surgery , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  H. Kuokkanen,et al.  Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  Y. Kim,et al.  Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  S. Dekel,et al.  Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  M. Ritter,et al.  Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  S. Overgaard,et al.  Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[31]  B. K. Vaughn,et al.  The efficacy of suction drains after routine total joint arthroplasty. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.