The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis.

The negatively accelerated, gradually increasing learning curve is an artifact of group averaging in several commonly used basic learning paradigms (pigeon autoshaping, delay- and trace-eye-blink conditioning in the rabbit and rat, autoshaped hopper entry in the rat, plus maze performance in the rat, and water maze performance in the mouse). The learning curves for individual subjects show an abrupt, often step-like increase from the untrained level of responding to the level seen in the well trained subject. The rise is at least as abrupt as that commonly seen in psychometric functions in stimulus detection experiments. It may indicate that the appearance of conditioned behavior is mediated by an evidence-based decision process, as in stimulus detection experiments. If the appearance of conditioned behavior is taken instead to reflect the increase in an underlying associative strength, then a negligible portion of the function relating associative strength to amount of experience is behaviorally visible. Consequently, rate of learning cannot be estimated from the group-average curve; the best measure is latency to the onset of responding, determined for each subject individually.

[1]  I. Krechevsky,et al.  "Hypotheses" in rats. , 1932 .

[2]  K. S. Lashley,et al.  An Examination of the “Continuity Theory” as Applied to Discriminative Learning , 1942 .

[3]  S. Hecht,et al.  ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION , 1942, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  Estes Wk The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[5]  D. M. Green,et al.  Psychoacoustics and Detection Theory , 1960 .

[6]  W. Estes,et al.  Learning theory and the new "mental chemistry". , 1960, Psychological review.

[7]  I. Rock,et al.  Methodological Questions in the Study of One-Trial Learning , 1963, Science.

[8]  F. Restle,et al.  Significance of all-or-none learning. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  D. R. Williams,et al.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  B. Skinner Farewell, My LOVELY!1 , 1976 .

[11]  P. Killeen Reflections on a Cumulative Record , 1985, The Behavior analyst.

[12]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[13]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  D L Gilden,et al.  1/f noise in human cognition. , 1995, Science.

[15]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[16]  R. Rescorla Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[18]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  S. Kakade,et al.  Acquisition and extinction in autoshaping , 2002 .

[20]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002 .

[21]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Symbolic Foundations of Conditioned Behavior , 2002 .

[22]  R. Rescorla Comparison of the rates of associative change during acquisition and extinction. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  W. Estes,et al.  Traps in the route to models of memory and decision , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  A. Heathcote,et al.  Averaging learning curves across and within participants , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  S. Hélie,et al.  Testing curvatures of learning functions on individual trial and block average data , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Conditioning from an information processing perspective , 2003, Behavioural Processes.