How do users interact with a pet-robot and a humanoid

In this paper, we compare users' interaction with the humanoid robot ASIMO and the dog-shaped robot AIBO. We conducted a user study in which the participants had to teach object names and simple commands and give feedback to either AIBO or ASIMO. We did not find significant differences in the users' evaluation of both robots and in the way commands were given to the two different robots. However, the way of giving positive and negative feedback differed significantly: We found that for the pet-robot AIBO users tend to give reward in a similar way as giving reward to a real dog by touching it and commenting on its performance by uttering feedback like "well done" or "that was right". For the humanoid ASIMO, users did not use touch as a reward and rather used personal expressions like "thank you" to give positive feedback to the robot.

[1]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Effect of agent appearance on people's interpretation of agent's attitude , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human–Robot Interaction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  William F. Brewer Bartlett's concept of the schema and its impact on theories of knowledge representation in contemporary cognitive psychology. , 2000 .

[4]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Learning to understand parameterized commands through a human-robot training task , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Androids as an Experimental Apparatus: Why Is There an Uncanny Valley and Can We Exploit It? , 2005 .

[7]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..