Visual evoked potentials in young persons with newly diagnosed diabetes: a long‐term follow‐up

To evaluate the presence of electrophysiological abnormalities in the visual function of young persons with diabetes, visual evoked potentials were recorded, in basal conditions and after photostress, in 30 patients with newly diagnosed insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. Their mean age was 17.6 years (3.6 SD), and their glycosated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 9.4% (1.6 SD). Thirty healthy age‐ and sex‐matched individuals were evaluated as the control group. This study showed that the P100 latency was significantly delayed in patients with diabetes compared with the control group (p<0.01), while the N75 to P100 amplitude was similar in both groups. These measurements were repeated after 6 months, when all participants with diabetes had achieved good metabolic control (HbA1c 7.2% [1.5 SD]). At this second evaluation a complete normalisation of all parameters was observed. These findings suggest that early functional abnormalities of the optic nerve can be detected at onset of diabetes, and that glycaemic control reverses these abnormalities.

[1]  E. Parzinger,et al.  VEP and ERP Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents with Prepubertal Onset of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus , 1996, Neuropediatrics.

[2]  P Drouin,et al.  Improved Visual Evoked Potential Latencies In Poorly Controlled Diabetic Patients After Short-Term Strict Metabolic Control , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[3]  L. Bongiovanni,et al.  Visual Evoked Potentials in Diabetic Children and Adolescents , 1984, Diabetes Care.

[4]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Recommended standards for electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Horan.  Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children--1987. Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. , 1987, Pediatrics.

[6]  P. Wong,et al.  Visual evoked responses in diabetes. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  V. Parisi,et al.  Electrophysiological assessment of visual function in IDDM patients. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Weir,et al.  Do Rheological Variables Play a Role in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy? , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[9]  J. Lovasik.  An electrophysiological investigation of the macular photostress test. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  K. Zahka.  Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. , 1987, Maryland medical journal.

[11]  F. Chiarelli,et al.  Autonomic dysfunction in newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus children. , 1996, Pediatric neurology.

[12]  G. Pozzessere,et al.  Abnormalities of Cognitive Functions in IDDM Revealed by P300 Event-Related Potential Analysis: Comparison With Short-Latency Evoked Potentials and Psychometric Tests , 1991, Diabetes.

[13]  D. Ewing,et al.  Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy: Present Insights and Future Prospects , 1986, Diabetes Care.

[14]  L. Dorfman,et al.  Spinal somatosensory conduction in diabetes , 1981, Neurology.

[15]  E. Mariani,et al.  Study of visual evoked potentials in diabetics without retinopathy: correlations with clinical findings and polyneuropathy , 1990, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[16]  F. Bellavere,et al.  Impaired Auditory Brainstem-evoked Responses in Insulin-dependent Diabetic Subjects , 1984, Diabetes.