Computationally predicted repositioning of an anticonvulsant for inflammatory bowel disease is confirmed experimentally. Greening Drug Discovery Recycling is good for the environment—and for drug development too. Repurposing existing, approved drugs can speed their adoption in the clinic because they can often take advantage of the existing rigorous safety testing required by the Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies. In a pair of papers, Sirota et al. and Dudley et al. examined publicly available gene expression data and determined the genes affected in 100 diseases and 164 drugs. By pairing drugs that correct abnormal gene expression in diseases, they confirm known effective drug-disease pairs and predict new indications for already approved agents. Experimental validation that an antiulcer drug and an antiepileptic can be reused for lung cancer and inflammatory bowel disease reinforces the promise of this approach. The authors scrutinized the data in Gene Expression Omnibus and identified a disease signature for 100 diseases, which they defined as the set of mRNAs that reliably increase or decrease in patients with that disease compared to normal individuals. They compared each of these disease signatures to each of the gene expression signatures for 164 drugs from the Connectivity Map, a collection of mRNA expression data from cultured human cells treated with bioactive small molecules that is maintained at the Broad Institute at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. A similarity score calculated by the authors for every possible pair of drug and disease ranged from +1 (a perfect correlation of signatures) to −1 (exactly opposite signatures). The investigators suggested that a similarity score of −1 would predict that the drug would ameliorate the abnormalities in the disease and thus be an effective therapy. This proved to be true for a number of drugs already on the market. The corticosteroid prednisolone, a common treatment for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, showed a strong similarity score for these two diseases. The histone deacetylase inhibitors trichostatin A, valproic acid, and vorinostat were predicted to work against brain tumors and other cancers (esophagus, lung, and colon), and there is experimental evidence that this is indeed the case. But in the ultimate test of method, the authors confirmed two new predictions in animal experiments: Cimetidine, an antiulcer drug, predicted by the authors to be effective against lung cancer, inhibited tumor cells in vitro and in vivo in mice. In addition, the antiepileptic topiramate, predicted to improve inflammatory bowel disease by similarity score, improved damage in colon tissue of rats treated with trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid, a model of the disease. These two drugs are therefore good candidates for recycling to treat two diseases in need of better therapies—lung cancer and inflammatory bowel disease—and we now have a way to mine available data for fast routes to new disease therapies. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract for which there are few safe and effective therapeutic options for long-term treatment and disease maintenance. Here, we applied a computational approach to discover new drug therapies for IBD in silico, using publicly available molecular data reporting gene expression in IBD samples and 164 small-molecule drug compounds. Among the top compounds predicted to be therapeutic for IBD by our approach were prednisolone, a corticosteroid used to treat IBD, and topiramate, an anticonvulsant drug not previously described to have efficacy for IBD or any related disorders of inflammation or the gastrointestinal tract. Using a trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)–induced rodent model of IBD, we experimentally validated our topiramate prediction in vivo. Oral administration of topiramate significantly reduced gross pathological signs and microscopic damage in primary affected colon tissue in the TNBS-induced rodent model of IBD. These findings suggest that topiramate might serve as a therapeutic option for IBD in humans and support the use of public molecular data and computational approaches to discover new therapeutic options for disease.
[1]
H. Cooper,et al.
Clinicopathologic study of dextran sulfate sodium experimental murine colitis.
,
1993,
Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.
[2]
R. Tibshirani,et al.
Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response
,
2001,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[3]
I. Fuss,et al.
Induction of TNBS colitis in mice.
,
2002,
Current protocols in immunology.
[4]
M. Zeitz,et al.
Animal Models of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Overview
,
2003,
Pathobiology.
[5]
D. Fairlie,et al.
A Potent Human C5a Receptor Antagonist Protects against Disease Pathology in a Rat Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease 1
,
2003,
The Journal of Immunology.
[6]
R. Xavier,et al.
Colonic epithelial functional phenotype varies with type and phase of experimental colitis.
,
2003,
Gastroenterology.
[7]
P. Rutgeerts,et al.
Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease.
,
2004,
The New England journal of medicine.
[8]
J. Reimund,et al.
Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease.
,
2004,
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.
[9]
E. Loftus.
Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: Incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences.
,
2004,
Gastroenterology.
[10]
Dennis B. Troup,et al.
NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles—database and tools
,
2004,
Nucleic Acids Res..
[11]
Paul A Clemons,et al.
The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease
,
2006,
Science.
[12]
J. Hulihan,et al.
Adjunctive topiramate therapy in patients receiving a mood stabilizer for bipolar I disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
,
2006,
The Journal of clinical psychiatry.
[13]
Idhaliz Flores,et al.
Molecular profiling of a rat model of colitis: Validation of known inflammatory genes and identification of novel disease‐associated targets
,
2006,
Inflammatory bowel diseases.
[14]
Stefan Wirtz,et al.
Chemically induced mouse models of intestinal inflammation
,
2007,
Nature Protocols.
[15]
S. Rössner,et al.
Topiramate in the treatment of obese subjects with drug‐naive type 2 diabetes
,
2007,
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.
[16]
R. Gearry,et al.
Review article: appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn’s disease
,
2007,
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.
[17]
A. Butte,et al.
AILUN: reannotating gene expression data automatically
,
2007,
Nature Methods.
[18]
W. Sandborn,et al.
Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies
,
2007,
The Lancet.
[19]
C. Supuran,et al.
Anticonvulsant sulfonamides/sulfamates/sulfamides with carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity: drug design and mechanism of action.
,
2008,
Current pharmaceutical design.
[20]
V. Bansal,et al.
Topiramate and Type 2 diabetes: an old wine in a new bottle
,
2008,
Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.
[21]
Melissa Miranda,et al.
Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation
,
2010,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[22]
Alexander A. Morgan,et al.
Discovery and Preclinical Validation of Drug Indications Using Compendia of Public Gene Expression Data
,
2011,
Science Translational Medicine.