Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase Letters

The determination of the visual features mediating letter identification has a long-standing history in cognitive science. Researchers have proposed many sets of letter features as important for letter identification, but no such sets have yet been derived directly from empirical data. In the study reported here, we applied the Bubbles technique to reveal directly which areas at five different spatial scales are efficient for the identification of lowercase and uppercase Arial letters. We provide the first empirical evidence that line terminations are the most important features for letter identification. We propose that these small features, represented at several spatial scales, help readers to discriminate among visually similar letters.

[1]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  J. Gibson,et al.  A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[5]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  Computer Simulation of Short-Term Memory: A Component-Decay Model , 1970 .

[6]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Alphabetic confusion: A test of models for individuals , 1971 .

[7]  L. H. Geyer,et al.  Feature lists and confusion matrices , 1973 .

[8]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  A comparison of methods for measuring the interletter similarity between capital letters , 1975 .

[9]  L. H. Geyer Recognition and confusion of the lowercase alphabet , 1977 .

[10]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  A. D. Tomos,et al.  A Comparison of Methods for Measuring Turgor , 1984 .

[12]  K R Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Sperling,et al.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[17]  Phillip L. Emerson,et al.  Holism revisited: evidence for parallel independent word-level and letter-level processors during word recognition , 1991 .

[18]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  When are reading units larger than the letter? Refinement of the unitization reading model. , 1991 .

[19]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[20]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[21]  E Peli,et al.  Enhancement of text for the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  Oscar Wilde The Importance of ‘ Being Earnest , 1997 .

[24]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[26]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[28]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[29]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[30]  D. Pelli,et al.  The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification , 2002, Vision Research.

[31]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked partial priming of letter perception , 2002 .

[33]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[34]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  A picture is worth thousands of trials: rendering the use of visual information from spiking neurons to recognition , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[36]  P. Schyns,et al.  A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage , 2005, Nature.

[37]  D. Pelli,et al.  Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.

[38]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Perceptual moments of conscious visual experience inferred from oscillatory brain activity. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Kristina J. Nielsen,et al.  Discrimination Strategies of Humans and Rhesus Monkeys for Complex Visual Displays , 2006, Current Biology.

[40]  P. Schyns,et al.  Nonaccidental Properties Underlie Shape Recognition in Mammalian and Nonmammalian Vision , 2007, Current Biology.

[41]  P. Schyns,et al.  Non-accidental properties underlie shape recognition in mammalian and non-mammalian vision , 2007 .